{"title":"网上个人道德案例对商务谈判道德推理的影响：实验研究","authors":"Daniel C. Brannon, Muhanad S. Manshad","doi":"10.1080/08832323.2021.2025022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There is increasing interest in the effectiveness of online case-based instruction. Although some prior research has emphasized the importance of online discussion and communication for these cases, recent work suggests that individual completion of these cases is also effective. In this research, participants individually read ethics cases and respond to questions from a popular online ethics case bank before completing the Self-reported Inappropriate Negotiation Strategies questionnaire. Students who individually engaged with the longer online case were less likely to endorse deceptive business negotiation tactics versus the control group, whereas students who engaged with the shorter online case were not.","PeriodicalId":47318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Business","volume":"98 1","pages":"43 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of online individual ethics cases on moral reasoning in business negotiation: An experimental study\",\"authors\":\"Daniel C. Brannon, Muhanad S. Manshad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08832323.2021.2025022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract There is increasing interest in the effectiveness of online case-based instruction. Although some prior research has emphasized the importance of online discussion and communication for these cases, recent work suggests that individual completion of these cases is also effective. In this research, participants individually read ethics cases and respond to questions from a popular online ethics case bank before completing the Self-reported Inappropriate Negotiation Strategies questionnaire. Students who individually engaged with the longer online case were less likely to endorse deceptive business negotiation tactics versus the control group, whereas students who engaged with the shorter online case were not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.2025022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.2025022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of online individual ethics cases on moral reasoning in business negotiation: An experimental study
Abstract There is increasing interest in the effectiveness of online case-based instruction. Although some prior research has emphasized the importance of online discussion and communication for these cases, recent work suggests that individual completion of these cases is also effective. In this research, participants individually read ethics cases and respond to questions from a popular online ethics case bank before completing the Self-reported Inappropriate Negotiation Strategies questionnaire. Students who individually engaged with the longer online case were less likely to endorse deceptive business negotiation tactics versus the control group, whereas students who engaged with the shorter online case were not.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Education for Business is for those educating tomorrow''s businesspeople. The journal primarily features basic and applied research-based articles in entrepreneurship, accounting, communications, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and other business disciplines. Along with the focus on reporting research within traditional business subjects, an additional expanded area of interest is publishing articles within the discipline of entrepreneurship. Articles report successful innovations in teaching and curriculum development at the college and postgraduate levels. Authors address changes in today''s business world and in the business professions that are fundamentally influencing the competencies that business graduates need. JEB also offers a forum for new theories and for analyses of controversial issues. Articles in the Journal fall into the following categories: Original and Applied Research; Editorial/Professional Perspectives; and Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices. Articles are selected on a blind peer-reviewed basis. Original and Applied Research - Articles published feature the results of formal research where findings have universal impact. Editorial/Professional Perspective - Articles published feature the viewpoint of primarily the author regarding important issues affecting education for business. Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices - Articles published feature the results of instructional experiments basically derived from a classroom project conducted at one institution by one or several faculty.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
