对地观测中机器学习实践和工程挑战的定性研究

IF 1 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IT-Information Technology Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI:10.1515/itit-2020-0045
Sophie F. Jentzsch, N. Hochgeschwender
{"title":"对地观测中机器学习实践和工程挑战的定性研究","authors":"Sophie F. Jentzsch, N. Hochgeschwender","doi":"10.1515/itit-2020-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Machine Learning (ML) is ubiquitously on the advance. Like many domains, Earth Observation (EO) also increasingly relies on ML applications, where ML methods are applied to process vast amounts of heterogeneous and continuous data streams to answer socially and environmentally relevant questions. However, developing such ML- based EO systems remains challenging: Development processes and employed workflows are often barely structured and poorly reported. The application of ML methods and techniques is considered to be opaque and the lack of transparency is contradictory to the responsible development of ML-based EO applications. To improve this situation a better understanding of the current practices and engineering-related challenges in developing ML-based EO applications is required. In this paper, we report observations from an exploratory study where five experts shared their view on ML engineering in semi-structured interviews. We analysed these interviews with coding techniques as often applied in the domain of empirical software engineering. The interviews provide informative insights into the practical development of ML applications and reveal several engineering challenges. In addition, interviewees participated in a novel workflow sketching task, which provided a tangible reflection of implicit processes. Overall, the results confirm a gap between theoretical conceptions and real practices in ML development even though workflows were sketched abstractly as textbook-like. The results pave the way for a large-scale investigation on requirements for ML engineering in EO.","PeriodicalId":43953,"journal":{"name":"IT-Information Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative study of Machine Learning practices and engineering challenges in Earth Observation\",\"authors\":\"Sophie F. Jentzsch, N. Hochgeschwender\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/itit-2020-0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Machine Learning (ML) is ubiquitously on the advance. Like many domains, Earth Observation (EO) also increasingly relies on ML applications, where ML methods are applied to process vast amounts of heterogeneous and continuous data streams to answer socially and environmentally relevant questions. However, developing such ML- based EO systems remains challenging: Development processes and employed workflows are often barely structured and poorly reported. The application of ML methods and techniques is considered to be opaque and the lack of transparency is contradictory to the responsible development of ML-based EO applications. To improve this situation a better understanding of the current practices and engineering-related challenges in developing ML-based EO applications is required. In this paper, we report observations from an exploratory study where five experts shared their view on ML engineering in semi-structured interviews. We analysed these interviews with coding techniques as often applied in the domain of empirical software engineering. The interviews provide informative insights into the practical development of ML applications and reveal several engineering challenges. In addition, interviewees participated in a novel workflow sketching task, which provided a tangible reflection of implicit processes. Overall, the results confirm a gap between theoretical conceptions and real practices in ML development even though workflows were sketched abstractly as textbook-like. The results pave the way for a large-scale investigation on requirements for ML engineering in EO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IT-Information Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IT-Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2020-0045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IT-Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2020-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要机器学习(ML)正在广泛发展。与许多领域一样,地球观测(EO)也越来越依赖ML应用,ML方法被应用于处理大量异构和连续的数据流,以回答与社会和环境相关的问题。然而,开发这种基于ML的EO系统仍然具有挑战性:开发过程和使用的工作流程通常几乎没有结构,报告也很少。ML方法和技术的应用被认为是不透明的,缺乏透明度与基于ML的EO应用的负责任开发相矛盾。为了改善这种情况,需要更好地了解开发基于ML的EO应用程序的当前实践和工程相关挑战。在本文中,我们报告了一项探索性研究的观察结果,五位专家在半结构化访谈中分享了他们对ML工程的看法。我们用经验软件工程领域中经常应用的编码技术分析了这些采访。访谈为ML应用程序的实际开发提供了丰富的见解,并揭示了几个工程挑战。此外,受访者参与了一项新颖的工作流程草图任务,该任务提供了对隐含过程的有形反映。总的来说,研究结果证实了ML开发中的理论概念和实际实践之间的差距,尽管工作流程被抽象地描绘成教科书式的。研究结果为大规模研究EO中ML工程的需求铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A qualitative study of Machine Learning practices and engineering challenges in Earth Observation
Abstract Machine Learning (ML) is ubiquitously on the advance. Like many domains, Earth Observation (EO) also increasingly relies on ML applications, where ML methods are applied to process vast amounts of heterogeneous and continuous data streams to answer socially and environmentally relevant questions. However, developing such ML- based EO systems remains challenging: Development processes and employed workflows are often barely structured and poorly reported. The application of ML methods and techniques is considered to be opaque and the lack of transparency is contradictory to the responsible development of ML-based EO applications. To improve this situation a better understanding of the current practices and engineering-related challenges in developing ML-based EO applications is required. In this paper, we report observations from an exploratory study where five experts shared their view on ML engineering in semi-structured interviews. We analysed these interviews with coding techniques as often applied in the domain of empirical software engineering. The interviews provide informative insights into the practical development of ML applications and reveal several engineering challenges. In addition, interviewees participated in a novel workflow sketching task, which provided a tangible reflection of implicit processes. Overall, the results confirm a gap between theoretical conceptions and real practices in ML development even though workflows were sketched abstractly as textbook-like. The results pave the way for a large-scale investigation on requirements for ML engineering in EO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IT-Information Technology
IT-Information Technology COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Wildfire prediction for California using and comparing Spatio-Temporal Knowledge Graphs Machine learning in AI Factories – five theses for developing, managing and maintaining data-driven artificial intelligence at large scale Machine learning applications Machine learning in sensor identification for industrial systems Machine learning and cyber security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1