选择一个设计,还是一个设计团队?反思实践和团队学习在建筑竞赛中的作用

IF 0.8 4区 艺术学 0 ART Design Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1080/14606925.2023.2215418
Linus Tan, Anita Kocsis, J. Burry
{"title":"选择一个设计,还是一个设计团队?反思实践和团队学习在建筑竞赛中的作用","authors":"Linus Tan, Anita Kocsis, J. Burry","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2023.2215418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the role of Reflective Practice and Team Learning when architecture teams pitch their proposals in a design competition. Pitching proposals is significant to architects because pitching designs in competitions is one of the ways architects procure jobs. Previous researchers used the principles of Reflective Practice to describe how teams design together. This study adds to those works by using the principles of Reflective Practice to describe how teams communicate their design to clients. Additionally, this case study introduces team learning concepts to describe how clients perceive design teams when pitching their proposal. In 2018, we observed six architecture teams pitch their design in an architecture competition, analysed the documents presented, and interviewed the jury. Results revealed that the winning team demonstrated the most Framing, Moving and Evaluating language in their pitch. They were also perceived to have demonstrated the most team learning behaviours amongst all the competitors.","PeriodicalId":46826,"journal":{"name":"Design Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"580 - 603"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Picking a design, or a design team? The role of reflective practice and team learning in architecture competitions\",\"authors\":\"Linus Tan, Anita Kocsis, J. Burry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14606925.2023.2215418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper examines the role of Reflective Practice and Team Learning when architecture teams pitch their proposals in a design competition. Pitching proposals is significant to architects because pitching designs in competitions is one of the ways architects procure jobs. Previous researchers used the principles of Reflective Practice to describe how teams design together. This study adds to those works by using the principles of Reflective Practice to describe how teams communicate their design to clients. Additionally, this case study introduces team learning concepts to describe how clients perceive design teams when pitching their proposal. In 2018, we observed six architecture teams pitch their design in an architecture competition, analysed the documents presented, and interviewed the jury. Results revealed that the winning team demonstrated the most Framing, Moving and Evaluating language in their pitch. They were also perceived to have demonstrated the most team learning behaviours amongst all the competitors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"580 - 603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2023.2215418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2023.2215418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了反思实践和团队学习在建筑团队在设计竞赛中提出他们的方案时所起的作用。提交方案对建筑师来说非常重要,因为在竞赛中提交设计方案是建筑师获得工作的方式之一。以前的研究人员使用反思性实践的原则来描述团队如何一起设计。本研究通过使用反思性实践的原则来描述团队如何与客户沟通他们的设计,从而增加了这些工作。此外,本案例研究还介绍了团队学习的概念,以描述客户在提交提案时如何看待设计团队。2018年,我们观察了六个建筑团队在建筑竞赛中展示他们的设计,分析了提交的文件,并采访了评审团。结果显示,获胜团队在他们的演讲中展示了最多的框架语言、移动语言和评估语言。他们也被认为在所有竞争者中表现出最多的团队学习行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Picking a design, or a design team? The role of reflective practice and team learning in architecture competitions
Abstract This paper examines the role of Reflective Practice and Team Learning when architecture teams pitch their proposals in a design competition. Pitching proposals is significant to architects because pitching designs in competitions is one of the ways architects procure jobs. Previous researchers used the principles of Reflective Practice to describe how teams design together. This study adds to those works by using the principles of Reflective Practice to describe how teams communicate their design to clients. Additionally, this case study introduces team learning concepts to describe how clients perceive design teams when pitching their proposal. In 2018, we observed six architecture teams pitch their design in an architecture competition, analysed the documents presented, and interviewed the jury. Results revealed that the winning team demonstrated the most Framing, Moving and Evaluating language in their pitch. They were also perceived to have demonstrated the most team learning behaviours amongst all the competitors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
68
期刊最新文献
Obstacles, Solutions and Creative Agencies: How Forces and Agencies Shape the Learning Process of Weaving Using actor–network theory to revisit the digitalized tool in social design Leading by design User-driven product development: Designed by, not designed for Co-design for active aging: An approach to stimulating creativity of the young elderly in urban China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1