衡量政治参与的当代挑战

Q2 Social Sciences Slovak Journal of Political Sciences Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.34135/SJPS.200202
Yerkebulan Sairambay
{"title":"衡量政治参与的当代挑战","authors":"Yerkebulan Sairambay","doi":"10.34135/SJPS.200202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The multifaceted nature of political participation has led to various ways of measuring it. This, in turn, has led to conflicting outcomes (even when applied to the same problem) in the research field. What are the contemporary challenges of measuring political participation? The main objective of this paper is to identify current challenges of measuring political participation that are common in the existing literature and empirical findings. This review paper examines different methods of measuring both online and offline political participation and shows current problems that are crucial to deal with methodological challenges in the emerging era of Web 3.0. Drawing from a careful analysis of 86 published (2012–2019) empirical research on new media and political participation, the present study finds that self-reported measures, different question-wordings, misuse of Likert scales and time frames, and the lack of clear concept of political participation are current problems of measuring political participation. In so doing, it contributes to research on political participation (1) attempting to gather various measurements and their common problems as well as (2) urging the importance of these challenges.","PeriodicalId":36889,"journal":{"name":"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Contemporary Challenges of Measuring Political Participation\",\"authors\":\"Yerkebulan Sairambay\",\"doi\":\"10.34135/SJPS.200202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The multifaceted nature of political participation has led to various ways of measuring it. This, in turn, has led to conflicting outcomes (even when applied to the same problem) in the research field. What are the contemporary challenges of measuring political participation? The main objective of this paper is to identify current challenges of measuring political participation that are common in the existing literature and empirical findings. This review paper examines different methods of measuring both online and offline political participation and shows current problems that are crucial to deal with methodological challenges in the emerging era of Web 3.0. Drawing from a careful analysis of 86 published (2012–2019) empirical research on new media and political participation, the present study finds that self-reported measures, different question-wordings, misuse of Likert scales and time frames, and the lack of clear concept of political participation are current problems of measuring political participation. In so doing, it contributes to research on political participation (1) attempting to gather various measurements and their common problems as well as (2) urging the importance of these challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34135/SJPS.200202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34135/SJPS.200202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

政治参与的多方面性质导致了衡量政治参与的各种方法。这反过来又导致了研究领域中相互矛盾的结果(即使适用于同一问题)。衡量政治参与的当代挑战是什么?本文的主要目的是确定当前衡量政治参与的挑战,这些挑战在现有文献和实证研究中很常见。这篇综述文章考察了衡量线上和线下政治参与的不同方法,并展示了当前的问题,这些问题对于应对新兴的Web 3.0时代的方法挑战至关重要。通过对86项已发表的(2012-2019)关于新媒体和政治参与的实证研究的仔细分析,本研究发现,自我报告的衡量标准、不同的问题措辞、滥用Likert量表和时间框架以及缺乏明确的政治参与概念是当前衡量政治参与的问题。通过这样做,它有助于对政治参与的研究(1)试图收集各种衡量标准及其常见问题,以及(2)敦促这些挑战的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Contemporary Challenges of Measuring Political Participation
The multifaceted nature of political participation has led to various ways of measuring it. This, in turn, has led to conflicting outcomes (even when applied to the same problem) in the research field. What are the contemporary challenges of measuring political participation? The main objective of this paper is to identify current challenges of measuring political participation that are common in the existing literature and empirical findings. This review paper examines different methods of measuring both online and offline political participation and shows current problems that are crucial to deal with methodological challenges in the emerging era of Web 3.0. Drawing from a careful analysis of 86 published (2012–2019) empirical research on new media and political participation, the present study finds that self-reported measures, different question-wordings, misuse of Likert scales and time frames, and the lack of clear concept of political participation are current problems of measuring political participation. In so doing, it contributes to research on political participation (1) attempting to gather various measurements and their common problems as well as (2) urging the importance of these challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Slovak Journal of Political Sciences
Slovak Journal of Political Sciences Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Cooperation Between EU and NATO in Response to Hybrid Threats. A Retrospective Analysis from the Institutionalist Perspective Anti-Corruption Attitudes in Post-Communist Slovakia “Hellfire and Deviance” or Political Socialization? Populist Radical Right Parties and the Rhetoric of Emotions. The Slovak Case Study Lilleker, D.; Coman, I. A.; Gregor, M.; Novelli, E. eds. (2021). Political Communication and Covid-19. Governance and Rhetoric in Times of Crisis The Potential of Using Websites for Communication of Political Parties: The Case of Slovakia Before the 2020 Elections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1