2016年引入加热烟草产品后意大利对香烟需求的计量分析

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY British Food Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1108/bfj-09-2022-0760
Stefano Marzioni, Alessandro Pandimiglio, Marco Spallone
{"title":"2016年引入加热烟草产品后意大利对香烟需求的计量分析","authors":"Stefano Marzioni, Alessandro Pandimiglio, Marco Spallone","doi":"10.1108/bfj-09-2022-0760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article provides evidence of a long-term structural relationship between demand for heated tobacco products (HTPs) and for combustible cigarettes in a Marshallian demand framework, using data from the Italian market.Design/methodology/approachA cointegration-based approach allows to capture the substitution effects between the two products arising for reasons (possibly) other than price.FindingsThe authors find that such a relationship exists and is sufficiently strong to constitute a cointegration.Social implicationsSince a fully consolidated consensus on reduced harm from smokeless tobacco products is absent, symmetric policies on both markets are therefore necessary in terms of regulation and excise incidence to minimize the social cost of substitution and to maximize government revenues, which are a necessary counterpart to negative externalities that arise with smoking both products.Originality/valueThis paper focuses on the Italian market with product specific volume and price data, both for cigarettes and HTPs. Because of the detected relationship, a regulatory trade-off arises in case of a relatively mild regulation on heated-tobacco products: benefits from decreasing demand for combustible cigarettes may be offset by the social cost of increasing consumption of heated tobacco products. Moreover, a milder regulation makes price related policies to curb smoking less effective.","PeriodicalId":9231,"journal":{"name":"British Food Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An econometric analysis of the demand for cigarettes in Italy after the introduction of heated tobacco products in 2016\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Marzioni, Alessandro Pandimiglio, Marco Spallone\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bfj-09-2022-0760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis article provides evidence of a long-term structural relationship between demand for heated tobacco products (HTPs) and for combustible cigarettes in a Marshallian demand framework, using data from the Italian market.Design/methodology/approachA cointegration-based approach allows to capture the substitution effects between the two products arising for reasons (possibly) other than price.FindingsThe authors find that such a relationship exists and is sufficiently strong to constitute a cointegration.Social implicationsSince a fully consolidated consensus on reduced harm from smokeless tobacco products is absent, symmetric policies on both markets are therefore necessary in terms of regulation and excise incidence to minimize the social cost of substitution and to maximize government revenues, which are a necessary counterpart to negative externalities that arise with smoking both products.Originality/valueThis paper focuses on the Italian market with product specific volume and price data, both for cigarettes and HTPs. Because of the detected relationship, a regulatory trade-off arises in case of a relatively mild regulation on heated-tobacco products: benefits from decreasing demand for combustible cigarettes may be offset by the social cost of increasing consumption of heated tobacco products. Moreover, a milder regulation makes price related policies to curb smoking less effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Food Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Food Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-09-2022-0760\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Food Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-09-2022-0760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用意大利市场的数据,提供了马歇尔需求框架中加热烟草制品(HTPs)和可燃香烟需求之间长期结构关系的证据。设计/方法/方法基于协整的方法可以捕捉两种产品之间由于(可能)价格以外的原因而产生的替代效应。研究结果作者发现这种关系是存在的,并且足够强,可以构成协整。社会影响由于没有就减少无烟烟草制品的危害达成充分巩固的共识,因此,就监管和消费税发生率而言,两个市场上的对称政策是必要的,以尽量减少替代的社会成本,并最大限度地提高政府收入,这是吸烟两种产品所产生的负外部性的必要对应。原创性/价值本文主要关注意大利市场的产品具体数量和价格数据,包括香烟和HTPs。由于发现了这种关系,如果对加热烟草制品的监管相对温和,就会出现监管上的权衡:可燃卷烟需求减少带来的好处可能被加热烟草制品消费增加带来的社会成本所抵消。此外,较温和的监管使得与价格相关的遏制吸烟政策效果不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An econometric analysis of the demand for cigarettes in Italy after the introduction of heated tobacco products in 2016
PurposeThis article provides evidence of a long-term structural relationship between demand for heated tobacco products (HTPs) and for combustible cigarettes in a Marshallian demand framework, using data from the Italian market.Design/methodology/approachA cointegration-based approach allows to capture the substitution effects between the two products arising for reasons (possibly) other than price.FindingsThe authors find that such a relationship exists and is sufficiently strong to constitute a cointegration.Social implicationsSince a fully consolidated consensus on reduced harm from smokeless tobacco products is absent, symmetric policies on both markets are therefore necessary in terms of regulation and excise incidence to minimize the social cost of substitution and to maximize government revenues, which are a necessary counterpart to negative externalities that arise with smoking both products.Originality/valueThis paper focuses on the Italian market with product specific volume and price data, both for cigarettes and HTPs. Because of the detected relationship, a regulatory trade-off arises in case of a relatively mild regulation on heated-tobacco products: benefits from decreasing demand for combustible cigarettes may be offset by the social cost of increasing consumption of heated tobacco products. Moreover, a milder regulation makes price related policies to curb smoking less effective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Food Journal
British Food Journal 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
15.20%
发文量
219
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: After 115 years, the British Food Journal (BFJ) continues to be highly respected worldwide for its broad and unique interdisciplinary coverage of the latest food-related double blind peer-reviewed research. It links all sectors of this dynamic industry, keeping abreast of emerging trends, topical and controversial issues and informing and stimulating debate. - See more at: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=bfj#sthash.O3wH4pEh.dpuf
期刊最新文献
Product-based marketing strategies: pork consumption in Taiwan and Japan A multi-level tool to support the circular economy decision-making process in agri-food entrepreneurship The perceived authenticity in food among sociological generations: the case of cheeses in Mexico Ambidextrous cultural values in the management of organisational ambidexterity Exploring the determinants of purchase intention of organic consumers for organic food items: an exploratory study in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1