每日吉非替尼与每日埃洛替尼同时放化疗治疗局部晚期口咽癌的比较

P. Nagpal, U. Suryanarayana, D. Pruthi, Rakeshkumar Vyas, M. Gohil
{"title":"每日吉非替尼与每日埃洛替尼同时放化疗治疗局部晚期口咽癌的比较","authors":"P. Nagpal, U. Suryanarayana, D. Pruthi, Rakeshkumar Vyas, M. Gohil","doi":"10.4103/ccij.ccij_114_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Concurrent chemoradiation had been the standard of care for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers. The addition of newer targeted therapies such as cetuximab has resulted in improved locoregional control rates along with tolerable toxicities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response with addition of newer generation of systemic targeted agents (gefitinib and erlotinib) in combination with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of fifty patients of locally advanced carcinoma oropharynx were randomized by odd–even technique to two arms. Arm A (24 patients) received radiotherapy along with concurrent weekly carboplatin 150 mg and daily gefitinib 250 mg, whereas Arm B (25 patients) received erlotinib 150 mg daily along with same chemoradiation regimen as in arm A. Results: The mean age group in the gefitinib and erlotinib groups was 56.9 and 55.1 years. The most common subsite was base of tongue followed by tonsil. The complete response rate was nearly the same in both the arms at the end of treatment. At the end of 1 and 2 years, the disease-free survival (DFS) was more in the gefitinib group as compared to erlotinib group (41.6% vs. 29.1%) and (33.3% vs. 25%), respectively. Conclusion: There was no significant improvement in DFS and OS with the administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) along with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This might be attributed to the fact that longer duration of TKI was not administered, variable bioavailability of TKIs, and other immune-dependent mechanism when compared to cetuximab and other monoclonal antibodies.","PeriodicalId":44457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"203 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of concurrent chemoradiation with daily gefitinib versus daily erlotinib in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers\",\"authors\":\"P. Nagpal, U. Suryanarayana, D. Pruthi, Rakeshkumar Vyas, M. Gohil\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ccij.ccij_114_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Concurrent chemoradiation had been the standard of care for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers. The addition of newer targeted therapies such as cetuximab has resulted in improved locoregional control rates along with tolerable toxicities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response with addition of newer generation of systemic targeted agents (gefitinib and erlotinib) in combination with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of fifty patients of locally advanced carcinoma oropharynx were randomized by odd–even technique to two arms. Arm A (24 patients) received radiotherapy along with concurrent weekly carboplatin 150 mg and daily gefitinib 250 mg, whereas Arm B (25 patients) received erlotinib 150 mg daily along with same chemoradiation regimen as in arm A. Results: The mean age group in the gefitinib and erlotinib groups was 56.9 and 55.1 years. The most common subsite was base of tongue followed by tonsil. The complete response rate was nearly the same in both the arms at the end of treatment. At the end of 1 and 2 years, the disease-free survival (DFS) was more in the gefitinib group as compared to erlotinib group (41.6% vs. 29.1%) and (33.3% vs. 25%), respectively. Conclusion: There was no significant improvement in DFS and OS with the administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) along with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This might be attributed to the fact that longer duration of TKI was not administered, variable bioavailability of TKIs, and other immune-dependent mechanism when compared to cetuximab and other monoclonal antibodies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"203 - 208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccij.ccij_114_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccij.ccij_114_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:同步放化疗一直是局部晚期口咽癌的标准治疗方法。新的靶向治疗如西妥昔单抗的加入已经改善了局部控制率和可耐受的毒性。本研究的目的是评估添加新一代全身靶向药物(吉非替尼和厄洛替尼)联合放化疗治疗局部晚期口咽癌的疗效。材料与方法:采用单双号法将50例局部晚期口咽癌患者随机分为两组。A组(24名患者)接受放疗,同时每周卡铂150毫克,每日吉非替尼250毫克,而B组(25名患者)接受厄洛替尼150毫克,每日化疗方案与A组相同。结果:吉非替尼组和厄洛替尼组的平均年龄分别为56.9岁和55.1岁。最常见的亚部位是舌根,其次是扁桃体。治疗结束时,两组患者的完全缓解率几乎相同。在1年和2年结束时,吉非替尼组的无病生存期(DFS)分别高于厄洛替尼组(41.6%对29.1%)和(33.3%对25%)。结论:在放化疗的同时给予酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)对DFS和OS无显著改善。这可能是由于与西妥昔单抗和其他单克隆抗体相比,TKI未施用的时间更长,TKI的生物利用度可变以及其他免疫依赖机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of concurrent chemoradiation with daily gefitinib versus daily erlotinib in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers
Background: Concurrent chemoradiation had been the standard of care for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers. The addition of newer targeted therapies such as cetuximab has resulted in improved locoregional control rates along with tolerable toxicities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response with addition of newer generation of systemic targeted agents (gefitinib and erlotinib) in combination with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of fifty patients of locally advanced carcinoma oropharynx were randomized by odd–even technique to two arms. Arm A (24 patients) received radiotherapy along with concurrent weekly carboplatin 150 mg and daily gefitinib 250 mg, whereas Arm B (25 patients) received erlotinib 150 mg daily along with same chemoradiation regimen as in arm A. Results: The mean age group in the gefitinib and erlotinib groups was 56.9 and 55.1 years. The most common subsite was base of tongue followed by tonsil. The complete response rate was nearly the same in both the arms at the end of treatment. At the end of 1 and 2 years, the disease-free survival (DFS) was more in the gefitinib group as compared to erlotinib group (41.6% vs. 29.1%) and (33.3% vs. 25%), respectively. Conclusion: There was no significant improvement in DFS and OS with the administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) along with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This might be attributed to the fact that longer duration of TKI was not administered, variable bioavailability of TKIs, and other immune-dependent mechanism when compared to cetuximab and other monoclonal antibodies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Value of ascitic fluid lipids in the differentiation between cirrhotic and malignant ascites Analysis of Interaction between Twenty-Seven Pyrimidinone Derivatives with XIAP Using a Theoretical Model Methods of Treatment of Hemangiomas Theoretical Evaluation of Twenty-Cannabinoid Derivatives on Either Androgen Receptor or 5α-Reductase Enzyme Pulmonary Carcinosarcoma is a Rare Cancer with a Poor Prognosis – A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1