老年人运动指导员定量评价量表的研制

Q4 Health Professions Exercise Science Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.15857/ksep.2022.00507
Jeeyoung Hong, Haeryun Kim, H. Kong
{"title":"老年人运动指导员定量评价量表的研制","authors":"Jeeyoung Hong, Haeryun Kim, H. Kong","doi":"10.15857/ksep.2022.00507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to quantitatively evaluate the exercise instructor’s teaching ability and to verify its validity and reliability.METHODS: The participants were 331 students enrolled in the college of physical education. The survey was conducted using Google Forms. The questionnaire contained 36 questions, comprising seven questions on professionalism; eight on emotional communication ability; nine on fidelity; and, twelve on safety. A 5-point Likert scale was used. Factor analysis was performed, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for the validity and reliability analyses of the research tool; additionally, correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed. All data were analyzed using the STATA 17.0 statistical program.RESULTS: In the exercise instructor for older people evaluation questionnaire developed in this study, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value was 0.8 (0.88-0.93) for all factors, demonstrating its validity for factors including professionalism, emotional communication ability, fidelity, and safety. Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.9031, indicating high reliability. A strong correlation exists between factors, and through regression analysis, age (.1874, p=.027), professionalism (.8049, p=.000), fidelity (.6009, p=.000). The adequacy of the evaluation questionnaire (1.8606, p=.000) had a statistically significant effect on safety.CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire can be used as a tool to improve the quality of the exercise instructors for older people and serve to recognize the appropriate instructional methods for prospective exercise instructors for older people.","PeriodicalId":36291,"journal":{"name":"Exercise Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Scale for Quantitative Evaluation of Exercise Instructors for Older People\",\"authors\":\"Jeeyoung Hong, Haeryun Kim, H. Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.15857/ksep.2022.00507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to quantitatively evaluate the exercise instructor’s teaching ability and to verify its validity and reliability.METHODS: The participants were 331 students enrolled in the college of physical education. The survey was conducted using Google Forms. The questionnaire contained 36 questions, comprising seven questions on professionalism; eight on emotional communication ability; nine on fidelity; and, twelve on safety. A 5-point Likert scale was used. Factor analysis was performed, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for the validity and reliability analyses of the research tool; additionally, correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed. All data were analyzed using the STATA 17.0 statistical program.RESULTS: In the exercise instructor for older people evaluation questionnaire developed in this study, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value was 0.8 (0.88-0.93) for all factors, demonstrating its validity for factors including professionalism, emotional communication ability, fidelity, and safety. Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.9031, indicating high reliability. A strong correlation exists between factors, and through regression analysis, age (.1874, p=.027), professionalism (.8049, p=.000), fidelity (.6009, p=.000). The adequacy of the evaluation questionnaire (1.8606, p=.000) had a statistically significant effect on safety.CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire can be used as a tool to improve the quality of the exercise instructors for older people and serve to recognize the appropriate instructional methods for prospective exercise instructors for older people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exercise Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exercise Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15857/ksep.2022.00507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15857/ksep.2022.00507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是编制一份定量评价运动指导员教学能力的量表,并对其效度和信度进行验证。方法:以331名体育学院在校生为研究对象。这项调查是使用谷歌表格进行的。问卷共36个问题,其中7个是关于专业精神的问题;八、情感沟通能力;九是忠诚;12个是关于安全的。采用5分李克特量表。进行因子分析,计算Cronbach’s alpha系数对研究工具进行效度和信度分析;并进行相关分析和多元回归分析。所有数据采用STATA 17.0统计程序进行分析。结果:在本研究编制的老年人运动指导员评价问卷中,各因子的KMO值均为0.8(0.88-0.93),对专业性、情感沟通能力、保真度、安全性等因子具有一定的效度。Cronbach α系数为0.9031,信度较高。各因素之间存在很强的相关性,通过回归分析,年龄(。1874, p=.027),专业性(。8049, p=.000),保真度(。6009年,p =组织)。评价问卷的充分性(1.8606,p=.000)对安全性有统计学意义。结论:本问卷可作为提高老年人运动指导员素质的工具,并为未来的老年人运动指导员选择合适的教学方法提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a Scale for Quantitative Evaluation of Exercise Instructors for Older People
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to quantitatively evaluate the exercise instructor’s teaching ability and to verify its validity and reliability.METHODS: The participants were 331 students enrolled in the college of physical education. The survey was conducted using Google Forms. The questionnaire contained 36 questions, comprising seven questions on professionalism; eight on emotional communication ability; nine on fidelity; and, twelve on safety. A 5-point Likert scale was used. Factor analysis was performed, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for the validity and reliability analyses of the research tool; additionally, correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed. All data were analyzed using the STATA 17.0 statistical program.RESULTS: In the exercise instructor for older people evaluation questionnaire developed in this study, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value was 0.8 (0.88-0.93) for all factors, demonstrating its validity for factors including professionalism, emotional communication ability, fidelity, and safety. Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.9031, indicating high reliability. A strong correlation exists between factors, and through regression analysis, age (.1874, p=.027), professionalism (.8049, p=.000), fidelity (.6009, p=.000). The adequacy of the evaluation questionnaire (1.8606, p=.000) had a statistically significant effect on safety.CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire can be used as a tool to improve the quality of the exercise instructors for older people and serve to recognize the appropriate instructional methods for prospective exercise instructors for older people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Exercise Science
Exercise Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Health-related Physical Fitness, Blood Pressure, and Body Mass Index among People with Intellectual Disability, Visual Impairment, and Hearing Impairment Cognitive Improvement through Breathing Exercises in Post-Stroke Respiratory Sarcopenia: A Review Melatonin as an Antioxidant Supplement in Athletes: A Literature Review of Current Evidence How to Measure Mitochondrial Oxygen Respiration Association Between Dysmobility Syndrome with Serum Vitamin D in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1