潘庆熙、王爱媛编,《现代亚洲的时尚、身份与权力》

IF 0.5 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEXTILE HISTORY Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00404969.2020.1741206
W. Bamber
{"title":"潘庆熙、王爱媛编,《现代亚洲的时尚、身份与权力》","authors":"W. Bamber","doi":"10.1080/00404969.2020.1741206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an era of rapid social transformation, technological change and imperialism, choices of dress and consumption took on deeply political significance. The political dimensions of clothing, deployed in the service of authoritarian nation-building, defiance, emancipatory movements and the navigation of changing social norms, are at the heart of this volume on East Asian fashion history. Seeking to go beyond objectifying, museum-centric approaches, its essays highlight the intersections of dress history with ‘issues of gender and the body, power and control, commerce and manufacturing and art and popular culture’ (p. 1). As such, it is a welcome addition to the growing literature that takes seriously the diversity and agency of modernising consumption patterns in regions other than the West. Comprising fourteen essays on Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Taiwanese and Hong Kong dress history over c. 1880–1960, the project collectively aspires to present a ‘broader transcultural perspective’ (p. 3), highlighting elements of common experience and interconnection across the region. While many individual contributions do remain limited to national frameworks and courtly or elite subjects, the editors have ordered the chapters carefully so as to bring them into productive dialogue with one another and generate a genuine sense of development across the region as a whole. The best essays are those that deploy histories of particular objects, movements or styles to complicate teleologies of national modernisation, highlighting the alternate visions of social order and modernity that became expressed through dress, and the localised ambivalence often generated by the new possibilities of globalised consumption. The volume is further enriched by a wide, often creative array of sources and approaches. This is exemplified by Rachel Silberstein and Seiko Sugimoto in Chapters 10 and 11, which combine statistical, historical and even popular literary sources with visual analysis of pictures and dress to construct a compelling picture of woollen cloths’ historical importance in China and Japan. The best sections of the book in fact might offer useful methodological inspiration for further studies in this field. The book is divided into four thematic sections. The first, ‘Garments and Uniform’, considers state impositions of modernised official costume. The three essays by Yoshinori Osakebe, Kyungmee Lee and Aida Yuen Wong, which focus on official dress reforms in Japan, Korea and China respectively, work particularly well together, showing both the common kinds of opposition these measures encountered and the degree to which these three countries were a constant reference point to each other as they sought to reinvent themselves. Osakebe shows how Westernising Meiji dress codes, far from finding easy acceptance, became an emotive proxy for the competing political visions of factions of old nobility and a rising bureaucratic cadre. Lee and Wong meanwhile highlight the challenges of Korean and Chinese reformers negotiating the twin forks of European and Japanese imperialism, as well as the symbolic weight of Sinocentric Confucian heritage. Textile History, 51 (1), May 2020","PeriodicalId":43311,"journal":{"name":"TEXTILE HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00404969.2020.1741206","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kyunghee Pyun and Aida Yuen Wong, eds, Fashion, Identity and Power in Modern Asia\",\"authors\":\"W. Bamber\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00404969.2020.1741206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an era of rapid social transformation, technological change and imperialism, choices of dress and consumption took on deeply political significance. The political dimensions of clothing, deployed in the service of authoritarian nation-building, defiance, emancipatory movements and the navigation of changing social norms, are at the heart of this volume on East Asian fashion history. Seeking to go beyond objectifying, museum-centric approaches, its essays highlight the intersections of dress history with ‘issues of gender and the body, power and control, commerce and manufacturing and art and popular culture’ (p. 1). As such, it is a welcome addition to the growing literature that takes seriously the diversity and agency of modernising consumption patterns in regions other than the West. Comprising fourteen essays on Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Taiwanese and Hong Kong dress history over c. 1880–1960, the project collectively aspires to present a ‘broader transcultural perspective’ (p. 3), highlighting elements of common experience and interconnection across the region. While many individual contributions do remain limited to national frameworks and courtly or elite subjects, the editors have ordered the chapters carefully so as to bring them into productive dialogue with one another and generate a genuine sense of development across the region as a whole. The best essays are those that deploy histories of particular objects, movements or styles to complicate teleologies of national modernisation, highlighting the alternate visions of social order and modernity that became expressed through dress, and the localised ambivalence often generated by the new possibilities of globalised consumption. The volume is further enriched by a wide, often creative array of sources and approaches. This is exemplified by Rachel Silberstein and Seiko Sugimoto in Chapters 10 and 11, which combine statistical, historical and even popular literary sources with visual analysis of pictures and dress to construct a compelling picture of woollen cloths’ historical importance in China and Japan. The best sections of the book in fact might offer useful methodological inspiration for further studies in this field. The book is divided into four thematic sections. The first, ‘Garments and Uniform’, considers state impositions of modernised official costume. The three essays by Yoshinori Osakebe, Kyungmee Lee and Aida Yuen Wong, which focus on official dress reforms in Japan, Korea and China respectively, work particularly well together, showing both the common kinds of opposition these measures encountered and the degree to which these three countries were a constant reference point to each other as they sought to reinvent themselves. Osakebe shows how Westernising Meiji dress codes, far from finding easy acceptance, became an emotive proxy for the competing political visions of factions of old nobility and a rising bureaucratic cadre. Lee and Wong meanwhile highlight the challenges of Korean and Chinese reformers negotiating the twin forks of European and Japanese imperialism, as well as the symbolic weight of Sinocentric Confucian heritage. Textile History, 51 (1), May 2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":43311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEXTILE HISTORY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00404969.2020.1741206\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEXTILE HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00404969.2020.1741206\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXTILE HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00404969.2020.1741206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一个社会快速转型、技术变革和帝国主义的时代,着装和消费的选择具有深刻的政治意义。服装的政治层面是东亚时尚史这本书的核心,它为威权国家建设、反抗、解放运动和不断变化的社会规范服务。为了超越以博物馆为中心的客观化方法,其文章强调了服装史与“性别与身体、权力与控制、商业与制造、艺术与流行文化”的交叉点(第1页)。因此,这是对日益增长的重视西方以外地区消费模式现代化的多样性和能动性的文献的一个可喜补充。该项目由14篇关于1880-1960年间日本、中国、韩国、台湾和香港服饰历史的文章组成,共同致力于呈现“更广泛的跨文化视角”(第3页),突出整个地区的共同经验和相互联系。尽管许多个人贡献仍然局限于国家框架和宫廷或精英主题,但编辑们对章节进行了仔细的编排,以便使它们相互进行富有成效的对话,并在整个地区产生真正的发展感。最好的文章是那些利用特定物体、运动或风格的历史来复杂化国家现代化的目的论的文章,突出了通过着装表达的社会秩序和现代性的交替愿景,以及全球化消费的新可能性经常产生的地方矛盾心理。该卷进一步丰富了广泛的,往往是创造性的来源和方法。Rachel Silberstein和Seiko Sugimoto在第10章和第11章中举例说明了这一点,他们将统计、历史甚至流行的文学来源与图片和服装的视觉分析相结合,构建了一幅引人注目的羊毛布在中国和日本的历史重要性图。事实上,这本书最好的部分可能会为该领域的进一步研究提供有用的方法启发。这本书分为四个主题部分。第一个是“服装和制服”,考虑了国家对现代化官方服装的强制要求。Osakebe Yoshinori、Kyungmee Lee和Aida Yuen Wong的三篇文章分别聚焦于日本、韩国和中国的官方着装改革,合作得特别好,既显示了这些措施遇到的共同反对,也显示了这三个国家在寻求重塑自我时在多大程度上一直是彼此的参考点。Osakebe展示了西方化的明治着装规范,非但没有被轻易接受,反而成为旧贵族派系和不断崛起的官僚干部相互竞争的政治愿景的情感代表。与此同时,李和黄强调了韩国和中国改革者在谈判欧洲和日本帝国主义的两个分支时所面临的挑战,以及以中国为中心的儒家传统的象征意义。纺织史,51(1),2020年5月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kyunghee Pyun and Aida Yuen Wong, eds, Fashion, Identity and Power in Modern Asia
In an era of rapid social transformation, technological change and imperialism, choices of dress and consumption took on deeply political significance. The political dimensions of clothing, deployed in the service of authoritarian nation-building, defiance, emancipatory movements and the navigation of changing social norms, are at the heart of this volume on East Asian fashion history. Seeking to go beyond objectifying, museum-centric approaches, its essays highlight the intersections of dress history with ‘issues of gender and the body, power and control, commerce and manufacturing and art and popular culture’ (p. 1). As such, it is a welcome addition to the growing literature that takes seriously the diversity and agency of modernising consumption patterns in regions other than the West. Comprising fourteen essays on Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Taiwanese and Hong Kong dress history over c. 1880–1960, the project collectively aspires to present a ‘broader transcultural perspective’ (p. 3), highlighting elements of common experience and interconnection across the region. While many individual contributions do remain limited to national frameworks and courtly or elite subjects, the editors have ordered the chapters carefully so as to bring them into productive dialogue with one another and generate a genuine sense of development across the region as a whole. The best essays are those that deploy histories of particular objects, movements or styles to complicate teleologies of national modernisation, highlighting the alternate visions of social order and modernity that became expressed through dress, and the localised ambivalence often generated by the new possibilities of globalised consumption. The volume is further enriched by a wide, often creative array of sources and approaches. This is exemplified by Rachel Silberstein and Seiko Sugimoto in Chapters 10 and 11, which combine statistical, historical and even popular literary sources with visual analysis of pictures and dress to construct a compelling picture of woollen cloths’ historical importance in China and Japan. The best sections of the book in fact might offer useful methodological inspiration for further studies in this field. The book is divided into four thematic sections. The first, ‘Garments and Uniform’, considers state impositions of modernised official costume. The three essays by Yoshinori Osakebe, Kyungmee Lee and Aida Yuen Wong, which focus on official dress reforms in Japan, Korea and China respectively, work particularly well together, showing both the common kinds of opposition these measures encountered and the degree to which these three countries were a constant reference point to each other as they sought to reinvent themselves. Osakebe shows how Westernising Meiji dress codes, far from finding easy acceptance, became an emotive proxy for the competing political visions of factions of old nobility and a rising bureaucratic cadre. Lee and Wong meanwhile highlight the challenges of Korean and Chinese reformers negotiating the twin forks of European and Japanese imperialism, as well as the symbolic weight of Sinocentric Confucian heritage. Textile History, 51 (1), May 2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEXTILE HISTORY
TEXTILE HISTORY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Textile History is an internationally recognised, peer reviewed journal and one of the leading publications in its field. It is viewed as an important outlet for current research. Published in the spring and autumn of each year, its remit has always been to facilitate the publication of high-quality research and discussion in all aspects of scholarship arising from the history of textiles and dress. Since its foundation the scope of the journal has been substantially expanded to include articles dealing with aspects of the cultural and social history of apparel and textiles, as well as issues arising from the exhibition, preservation and interpretation of historic textiles or clothing.
期刊最新文献
The Production and Trade of Hand-Knitted Wool Stockings in Elizabethan and Early Jacobean England (c. 1580–c. 1617) A Set of Liturgical Vestments and Textiles Made for the Requiem Mass in the Early Eighteenth Century Redrafting Domestic Life: Women Textile Designers and New Professional Enterprises in Early 1970s Britain Early Twentieth-Century Nottingham Lace Curtains: An Ideal Window Furnishing ‘Zoom Into This Embroidered Panel for a Cabinet Door’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1