“那么,什么是好的男子气概?”:在男人和男孩的暴力预防中引导规范

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Australian Feminist Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/08164649.2022.2095612
Sarah McCook
{"title":"“那么,什么是好的男子气概?”:在男人和男孩的暴力预防中引导规范","authors":"Sarah McCook","doi":"10.1080/08164649.2022.2095612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Engaging men and boys to address the links between masculinity and gendered violence is a rapidly expanding space for primary prevention, in Australia and globally. There are parallel debates within feminist commentary on violence prevention and in masculinity studies over how to conceptualise and deconstruct masculinity for the long-term transformation of gender inequality. This article analyses semi-structured interviews with Australian prevention practitioners whose work focuses on engaging men and boys, which included initiatives aimed at gender equality, healthy masculinity, preventing violence against women, and domestic/family violence prevention. Interviews highlighted that these practitioners are currently grappling with how to address masculinity as a construct and/or a normative process within their work to achieve gender transformative change. These tensions reflect ongoing concerns over reproducing narrow associations between men and masculinity that perpetuate essentialised identity categories. Importantly, I question whether a focus on ‘positive’ or ‘healthy’ masculinities can effectively go beyond the binary gender relations that underpin gendered violence. The research findings suggest a need for greater reflexive and creative thinking around how men and masculinity are (de)centred within violence prevention to better support gender transformation.","PeriodicalId":46443,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"37 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘So, What is a Good Masculinity?’: Navigating Normativity in Violence Prevention with Men and Boys\",\"authors\":\"Sarah McCook\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08164649.2022.2095612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Engaging men and boys to address the links between masculinity and gendered violence is a rapidly expanding space for primary prevention, in Australia and globally. There are parallel debates within feminist commentary on violence prevention and in masculinity studies over how to conceptualise and deconstruct masculinity for the long-term transformation of gender inequality. This article analyses semi-structured interviews with Australian prevention practitioners whose work focuses on engaging men and boys, which included initiatives aimed at gender equality, healthy masculinity, preventing violence against women, and domestic/family violence prevention. Interviews highlighted that these practitioners are currently grappling with how to address masculinity as a construct and/or a normative process within their work to achieve gender transformative change. These tensions reflect ongoing concerns over reproducing narrow associations between men and masculinity that perpetuate essentialised identity categories. Importantly, I question whether a focus on ‘positive’ or ‘healthy’ masculinities can effectively go beyond the binary gender relations that underpin gendered violence. The research findings suggest a need for greater reflexive and creative thinking around how men and masculinity are (de)centred within violence prevention to better support gender transformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Feminist Studies\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"37 - 53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Feminist Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2022.2095612\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2022.2095612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在澳大利亚和全球范围内,让男人和男孩参与解决男子气概和性别暴力之间的联系是初级预防的一个迅速扩大的空间。在女权主义者对暴力预防的评论和男性气质研究中,关于如何概念化和解构男性气质以实现性别不平等的长期转变,也存在类似的辩论。本文分析了对澳大利亚预防从业人员的半结构化访谈,这些从业人员的工作重点是让男子和男孩参与进来,其中包括旨在实现性别平等、健康的男子气概、防止对妇女的暴力以及预防家庭/家庭暴力的倡议。采访强调,这些从业者目前正在努力解决如何将男性气概作为一种结构和/或规范过程,以实现性别变革。这些紧张关系反映了人们对男性和男子气概之间的狭隘联系的持续关注,这种联系使本质上的身份类别永久化。重要的是,我质疑对“积极”或“健康”男性气质的关注能否有效地超越支撑性别暴力的二元性别关系。研究结果表明,需要更多的反思和创造性思维,围绕如何将男性和男子气概(去)集中在暴力预防中,以更好地支持性别转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘So, What is a Good Masculinity?’: Navigating Normativity in Violence Prevention with Men and Boys
ABSTRACT Engaging men and boys to address the links between masculinity and gendered violence is a rapidly expanding space for primary prevention, in Australia and globally. There are parallel debates within feminist commentary on violence prevention and in masculinity studies over how to conceptualise and deconstruct masculinity for the long-term transformation of gender inequality. This article analyses semi-structured interviews with Australian prevention practitioners whose work focuses on engaging men and boys, which included initiatives aimed at gender equality, healthy masculinity, preventing violence against women, and domestic/family violence prevention. Interviews highlighted that these practitioners are currently grappling with how to address masculinity as a construct and/or a normative process within their work to achieve gender transformative change. These tensions reflect ongoing concerns over reproducing narrow associations between men and masculinity that perpetuate essentialised identity categories. Importantly, I question whether a focus on ‘positive’ or ‘healthy’ masculinities can effectively go beyond the binary gender relations that underpin gendered violence. The research findings suggest a need for greater reflexive and creative thinking around how men and masculinity are (de)centred within violence prevention to better support gender transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Feminist Studies
Australian Feminist Studies WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Australian Feminist Studies was launched in the summer of 1985 by the Research Centre for Women"s Studies at the University of Adelaide. During the subsequent two decades it has become a leading journal of feminist studies. As an international, peer-reviewed journal, Australian Feminist Studies is proud to sustain a clear political commitment to feminist teaching, research and scholarship. The journal publishes articles of the highest calibre from all around the world, that contribute to current developments and issues across a spectrum of feminisms.
期刊最新文献
Everything is Patchwork! A Conversation about Methodological Experimentation with Patchwork Ethnography. Doing Film Feminisms in the Age of Popular Feminism: A Roundtable Convened by Claire Perkins and Jodi Brooks Radioactive Spacetimes and the Quantum Cosmologies of Kathy Jetn̄il-Kijiner The History and Impact of Women in the Parliament of Western Australia: From Golden Age to Disappointment Sharing the Wealth: Tax, Justice, Gender and Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1