“超越自我”:泰德·休斯的《生日信》和嘉莉·埃特的《想象中的儿子》中的挽歌和修辞

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Writing in Creative Practice Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.1386/JWCP.12.1-2.9_1
Cathy Dreyer
{"title":"“超越自我”:泰德·休斯的《生日信》和嘉莉·埃特的《想象中的儿子》中的挽歌和修辞","authors":"Cathy Dreyer","doi":"10.1386/JWCP.12.1-2.9_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical analysis ofBirthday Lettersby Ted Hughes andImagined Sonsby Carrie Etter is illuminated by reading both texts against the rhetorical strategies and conventions of elegy.Birthday LettersandImagined Sonsare engaged in communicating strong feelings of grief following serious losses within lived experience, for which both construct first-person speakers. This article recognizes the presence of the conventions of elegy in both texts and suggests that despite thematic and structural similarities, there are significant differences in the ways the speakers in these texts are configured and how they address their audiences.","PeriodicalId":38498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Getting over our selves’: Elegy and rhetoric in Ted Hughes’sBirthday Lettersand Carrie Etter’sImagined Sons\",\"authors\":\"Cathy Dreyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/JWCP.12.1-2.9_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical analysis ofBirthday Lettersby Ted Hughes andImagined Sonsby Carrie Etter is illuminated by reading both texts against the rhetorical strategies and conventions of elegy.Birthday LettersandImagined Sonsare engaged in communicating strong feelings of grief following serious losses within lived experience, for which both construct first-person speakers. This article recognizes the presence of the conventions of elegy in both texts and suggests that despite thematic and structural similarities, there are significant differences in the ways the speakers in these texts are configured and how they address their audiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/JWCP.12.1-2.9_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JWCP.12.1-2.9_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对照挽歌的修辞策略和惯例阅读这两篇文章,可以对《生日来信》、《泰德·休斯》和《凯莉·艾特的想象之子》进行批判性分析。《生日信》和《想象之子》致力于传达生活经历中严重损失后的强烈悲痛感,两者都构建了第一人称扬声器。这篇文章承认了挽歌的惯例在两个文本中的存在,并表明尽管主题和结构相似,但在这些文本中的演讲者的配置方式以及他们如何向听众讲话方面存在重大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Getting over our selves’: Elegy and rhetoric in Ted Hughes’sBirthday Lettersand Carrie Etter’sImagined Sons
Critical analysis ofBirthday Lettersby Ted Hughes andImagined Sonsby Carrie Etter is illuminated by reading both texts against the rhetorical strategies and conventions of elegy.Birthday LettersandImagined Sonsare engaged in communicating strong feelings of grief following serious losses within lived experience, for which both construct first-person speakers. This article recognizes the presence of the conventions of elegy in both texts and suggests that despite thematic and structural similarities, there are significant differences in the ways the speakers in these texts are configured and how they address their audiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Writing in Creative Practice
Journal of Writing in Creative Practice Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Disfigment Bankrupsea Working Words: Words as tools to visualize embodied labour Towards a ‘spatial writing’: O Complex Mass Dialogue with St. K(aterina): An attempt at a prayer – a (not the) divine comedy Eight poor copies (electric speech)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1