知识管理与COVID-19:技术、人员和流程

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Knowledge and Process Management Pub Date : 2022-01-07 DOI:10.1002/kpm.1699
Eduardo Tomé, Elizaveta Gromova, Andrew Hatch
{"title":"知识管理与COVID-19:技术、人员和流程","authors":"Eduardo Tomé,&nbsp;Elizaveta Gromova,&nbsp;Andrew Hatch","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we analyse the impact of the Covid-19 crisis in organizations from the point of view of knowledge management. Specifically, we address the question of technology, people and processes. We conclude, first, that KM should be put at the centre stage in 2021 because, above all, first and foremost, the Covid-19 crisis is a crisis about knowledge, and that a massive knowledge failure has been at its core – namely, the absence of a vaccine and the cure for Covid-19. We furthermore conclude that in organizations, there was a complete lack of “social knowledge” linked with “organizational behaviour” which led to an organizational crisis; quite crucially, we believe that the mentioned crisis was even fostered by the immense technology available, but continued because, despite all the value of people, there was not knowledge about processes; in fact, suddenly, the drastic change in setting caused previously competent people to become incompetent. All this leads to the third conclusion, namely, the solution of the crisis will be achieved using technology and making people competent again and teaching them the right processes. Finally, for the time being, Humanity is still searching for answers, and we believe that all the partial measures (such as use of masks, social distance, washing hands, home/remote working, etc.) will mean an advance and increase in organizational agility.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"29 1","pages":"70-78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/kpm.1699","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge management and COVID-19: Technology, people and processes\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Tomé,&nbsp;Elizaveta Gromova,&nbsp;Andrew Hatch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/kpm.1699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this paper, we analyse the impact of the Covid-19 crisis in organizations from the point of view of knowledge management. Specifically, we address the question of technology, people and processes. We conclude, first, that KM should be put at the centre stage in 2021 because, above all, first and foremost, the Covid-19 crisis is a crisis about knowledge, and that a massive knowledge failure has been at its core – namely, the absence of a vaccine and the cure for Covid-19. We furthermore conclude that in organizations, there was a complete lack of “social knowledge” linked with “organizational behaviour” which led to an organizational crisis; quite crucially, we believe that the mentioned crisis was even fostered by the immense technology available, but continued because, despite all the value of people, there was not knowledge about processes; in fact, suddenly, the drastic change in setting caused previously competent people to become incompetent. All this leads to the third conclusion, namely, the solution of the crisis will be achieved using technology and making people competent again and teaching them the right processes. Finally, for the time being, Humanity is still searching for answers, and we believe that all the partial measures (such as use of masks, social distance, washing hands, home/remote working, etc.) will mean an advance and increase in organizational agility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowledge and Process Management\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"70-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/kpm.1699\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowledge and Process Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在本文中,我们从知识管理的角度分析了Covid-19危机对组织的影响。具体来说,我们解决了技术、人员和流程的问题。我们的结论是,首先,知识管理应在2021年被置于中心位置,因为最重要的是,Covid-19危机是一场知识危机,而严重的知识缺失一直是危机的核心——即缺乏Covid-19疫苗和治疗方法。我们进一步得出结论,在组织中,完全缺乏与“组织行为”相关的“社会知识”,导致组织危机;至关重要的是,我们认为,上述危机甚至是由现有的巨大技术促成的,但它仍在继续,因为尽管人有所有的价值,但没有关于过程的知识;事实上,突然之间,环境的巨大变化导致以前有能力的人变得无能。所有这些都导致了第三个结论,即危机的解决将通过技术实现,使人们再次胜任,并教他们正确的过程。最后,就目前而言,人类仍在寻找答案,我们相信所有的局部措施(如使用口罩,社交距离,洗手,在家/远程工作等)将意味着组织敏捷性的进步和增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge management and COVID-19: Technology, people and processes

In this paper, we analyse the impact of the Covid-19 crisis in organizations from the point of view of knowledge management. Specifically, we address the question of technology, people and processes. We conclude, first, that KM should be put at the centre stage in 2021 because, above all, first and foremost, the Covid-19 crisis is a crisis about knowledge, and that a massive knowledge failure has been at its core – namely, the absence of a vaccine and the cure for Covid-19. We furthermore conclude that in organizations, there was a complete lack of “social knowledge” linked with “organizational behaviour” which led to an organizational crisis; quite crucially, we believe that the mentioned crisis was even fostered by the immense technology available, but continued because, despite all the value of people, there was not knowledge about processes; in fact, suddenly, the drastic change in setting caused previously competent people to become incompetent. All this leads to the third conclusion, namely, the solution of the crisis will be achieved using technology and making people competent again and teaching them the right processes. Finally, for the time being, Humanity is still searching for answers, and we believe that all the partial measures (such as use of masks, social distance, washing hands, home/remote working, etc.) will mean an advance and increase in organizational agility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Unethical favouritism and KH: The mediating role of organisational injustice The next event will be held with more quality: Identifying and prioritizing barriers to knowledge management in sports events Context-driven implementation strategies: Exploring three approaches to implement a lean capability framework within a global production company Toward effective KMS measurement: Usage statistics vs. perceived value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1