2019冠状病毒病,术后炎症状态的弹出式差异及其对心脏手术后结果的影响——单中心体验

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_47_22
K. Ram Kiran, V. Trivedi, Rajesh P. Venuthurupalli, Deepika Gehlot, Sunil Ninama
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病,术后炎症状态的弹出式差异及其对心脏手术后结果的影响——单中心体验","authors":"K. Ram Kiran, V. Trivedi, Rajesh P. Venuthurupalli, Deepika Gehlot, Sunil Ninama","doi":"10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_47_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected care among surgical patients. Considering the underlying comorbidities, physical status, and intricate perioperative course, the cardiac surgery patient represents a vulnerable cohort. This study describes baseline characteristics, laboratory findings, diagnosis, postoperative course, and their correlation with immediate outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methodology: Patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institute for 1 year were screened for COVID-19 with the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction swab test and then were posted for surgery only after corroborating negative reports, except for emergency cases. Dedicated preoperative areas and COVID-appropriate measures were taken. Data from the electronic patient records of those diagnosed with COVID-19 in the immediate postoperative period were reviewed retrospectively. Continuous normal distributed variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation, alternatively as median ± interquartile range, and categorical variables as percentages. Results: A total of 22 patients were infected in the immediate postoperative period in spite of appropriate screening and had a high mortality of 36.36% (vs. non-COVID 6.27%, P < 0.001). Days from index surgery to diagnosis were 6 (±3.75). The median stay in the intensive care unit and hospital stay was 6 (±2.75) and 10 (±3.2) days, respectively. The moderate and high-risk categories of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II showed mortality of 33.3% (vs. 2.69% in non-COVID, odds ratio of 18.42) and 71.4% (vs. 11.2% in non-COVID, odds ratio of 19.65). Patients with C-reactive protein >100 mg/lit, D dimer >1000 ng/ml, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio >3.5 showed very high mortality. Noninvasive and invasive ventilation in 27.27% and 31.8%, respectively. Two patients acquired acute kidney injury that required hemodialysis. Conclusions: Despite requisite measures, COVID infection still remains a momentous differential to postoperative complications affecting early outcomes. Therefore, more robust preoperative protocols, better strategies for the COVID-free environment, and early clinical suspicion and workup are required to mitigate its effect on this cohort.","PeriodicalId":17503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"41 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronavirus disease 2019, a popup differential to the postoperative inflammatory state and its impact on outcomes after cardiac surgery – A single-center experience\",\"authors\":\"K. Ram Kiran, V. Trivedi, Rajesh P. Venuthurupalli, Deepika Gehlot, Sunil Ninama\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_47_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected care among surgical patients. Considering the underlying comorbidities, physical status, and intricate perioperative course, the cardiac surgery patient represents a vulnerable cohort. This study describes baseline characteristics, laboratory findings, diagnosis, postoperative course, and their correlation with immediate outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methodology: Patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institute for 1 year were screened for COVID-19 with the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction swab test and then were posted for surgery only after corroborating negative reports, except for emergency cases. Dedicated preoperative areas and COVID-appropriate measures were taken. Data from the electronic patient records of those diagnosed with COVID-19 in the immediate postoperative period were reviewed retrospectively. Continuous normal distributed variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation, alternatively as median ± interquartile range, and categorical variables as percentages. Results: A total of 22 patients were infected in the immediate postoperative period in spite of appropriate screening and had a high mortality of 36.36% (vs. non-COVID 6.27%, P < 0.001). Days from index surgery to diagnosis were 6 (±3.75). The median stay in the intensive care unit and hospital stay was 6 (±2.75) and 10 (±3.2) days, respectively. The moderate and high-risk categories of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II showed mortality of 33.3% (vs. 2.69% in non-COVID, odds ratio of 18.42) and 71.4% (vs. 11.2% in non-COVID, odds ratio of 19.65). Patients with C-reactive protein >100 mg/lit, D dimer >1000 ng/ml, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio >3.5 showed very high mortality. Noninvasive and invasive ventilation in 27.27% and 31.8%, respectively. Two patients acquired acute kidney injury that required hemodialysis. Conclusions: Despite requisite measures, COVID infection still remains a momentous differential to postoperative complications affecting early outcomes. Therefore, more robust preoperative protocols, better strategies for the COVID-free environment, and early clinical suspicion and workup are required to mitigate its effect on this cohort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_47_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_47_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)影响手术患者的护理。考虑到潜在的合并症、身体状况和复杂的围手术期过程,心脏手术患者是一个脆弱的群体。本研究描述了心脏手术患者的基线特征、实验室结果、诊断、术后过程及其与即时预后的相关性。方法:在我院行心脏手术1年的患者,除急诊病例外,均采用逆转录聚合酶链反应拭子试验筛查COVID-19,经确证阴性报告后才行手术。采取了专门的术前区域和适合新冠病毒的措施。回顾性分析术后立即诊断为COVID-19的电子病历数据。连续正态分布变量表示为平均值±标准差,或者表示为中位数±四分位数范围,分类变量表示为百分比。结果:22例患者术后立即感染,尽管进行了适当的筛查,但死亡率高达36.36%(与未感染的患者相比为6.27%,P < 0.001)。从手术到诊断为6(±3.75)天。重症监护病房和住院时间的中位数分别为6(±2.75)天和10(±3.2)天。在欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II中,中等和高危类别的死亡率分别为33.3%(非covid组为2.69%,优势比为18.42)和71.4%(非covid组为11.2%,优势比为19.65)。c反应蛋白>100 mg/lit, D二聚体>1000 ng/ml,中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值bbb3.5的患者死亡率非常高。无创通气和有创通气分别占27.27%和31.8%。2例患者获得急性肾损伤,需要血液透析。结论:尽管采取了必要的措施,COVID感染仍然是影响早期预后的术后并发症的重要差异。因此,需要更健全的术前方案,更好的无covid - 19环境策略,以及早期临床怀疑和随访,以减轻其对该队列的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coronavirus disease 2019, a popup differential to the postoperative inflammatory state and its impact on outcomes after cardiac surgery – A single-center experience
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected care among surgical patients. Considering the underlying comorbidities, physical status, and intricate perioperative course, the cardiac surgery patient represents a vulnerable cohort. This study describes baseline characteristics, laboratory findings, diagnosis, postoperative course, and their correlation with immediate outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methodology: Patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institute for 1 year were screened for COVID-19 with the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction swab test and then were posted for surgery only after corroborating negative reports, except for emergency cases. Dedicated preoperative areas and COVID-appropriate measures were taken. Data from the electronic patient records of those diagnosed with COVID-19 in the immediate postoperative period were reviewed retrospectively. Continuous normal distributed variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation, alternatively as median ± interquartile range, and categorical variables as percentages. Results: A total of 22 patients were infected in the immediate postoperative period in spite of appropriate screening and had a high mortality of 36.36% (vs. non-COVID 6.27%, P < 0.001). Days from index surgery to diagnosis were 6 (±3.75). The median stay in the intensive care unit and hospital stay was 6 (±2.75) and 10 (±3.2) days, respectively. The moderate and high-risk categories of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II showed mortality of 33.3% (vs. 2.69% in non-COVID, odds ratio of 18.42) and 71.4% (vs. 11.2% in non-COVID, odds ratio of 19.65). Patients with C-reactive protein >100 mg/lit, D dimer >1000 ng/ml, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio >3.5 showed very high mortality. Noninvasive and invasive ventilation in 27.27% and 31.8%, respectively. Two patients acquired acute kidney injury that required hemodialysis. Conclusions: Despite requisite measures, COVID infection still remains a momentous differential to postoperative complications affecting early outcomes. Therefore, more robust preoperative protocols, better strategies for the COVID-free environment, and early clinical suspicion and workup are required to mitigate its effect on this cohort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences
Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Venous thromboembolism and cardiopulmonary involvement in Covid 2019 patients: A retrospective observational study Aspirin strategy for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: A narrative review Acute coronary syndrome in young (≤45 years) patients: An observational study Radial artery pseudoaneurysm following transradial percutaneous coronary intervention Authors should be held responsible for artificial intelligence hallucinations and mistakes in their papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1