Li-Shuang Zhao, Shaomei Wang, Lei Zhao, Zhi-hua Zhang
{"title":"不同纱布折叠方式对中心导管外周置入术后局部止血的影响","authors":"Li-Shuang Zhao, Shaomei Wang, Lei Zhao, Zhi-hua Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.04.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo observe the effects of two different gauze folding patterns used in local hemostasis after peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 152 patients were selected and divided into two groups according to PICC date sequence as control group of 72 patients using 2.0 cm×2.0 cm little gauze to oppress the puncture point and observation group of 80 patients using 1.0 cm×1.5 cm gauze ball made by ourselves to oppress the puncture point. The oozing of the puncture point was observed in patients of the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nThe hemostasis was better in the observation group than in the control group(χ2=15.88, P<0.01). No limb swelling happened to the patients in the observation group(χ2=58.064, P<0.01). There was statistically significant difference in hemostatic effect between the two groups. \n \n \nConclusion \nThe sterile gauze ball made by ourselves has a good effect on local hemostasis through oppressing the puncture point without any impact on blood circulation of limbs. \n \n \nKey words: \nPeripherally inserted central catherter; Sterility gauze ball; Local hemostasis","PeriodicalId":9877,"journal":{"name":"中华临床营养杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"254-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different gauze folding patterns on local hemostasis after peripherally inserted central catheters\",\"authors\":\"Li-Shuang Zhao, Shaomei Wang, Lei Zhao, Zhi-hua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.04.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo observe the effects of two different gauze folding patterns used in local hemostasis after peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA total of 152 patients were selected and divided into two groups according to PICC date sequence as control group of 72 patients using 2.0 cm×2.0 cm little gauze to oppress the puncture point and observation group of 80 patients using 1.0 cm×1.5 cm gauze ball made by ourselves to oppress the puncture point. The oozing of the puncture point was observed in patients of the two groups. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe hemostasis was better in the observation group than in the control group(χ2=15.88, P<0.01). No limb swelling happened to the patients in the observation group(χ2=58.064, P<0.01). There was statistically significant difference in hemostatic effect between the two groups. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nThe sterile gauze ball made by ourselves has a good effect on local hemostasis through oppressing the puncture point without any impact on blood circulation of limbs. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nPeripherally inserted central catherter; Sterility gauze ball; Local hemostasis\",\"PeriodicalId\":9877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华临床营养杂志\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"254-255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华临床营养杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.04.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华临床营养杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.04.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of different gauze folding patterns on local hemostasis after peripherally inserted central catheters
Objective
To observe the effects of two different gauze folding patterns used in local hemostasis after peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC).
Methods
A total of 152 patients were selected and divided into two groups according to PICC date sequence as control group of 72 patients using 2.0 cm×2.0 cm little gauze to oppress the puncture point and observation group of 80 patients using 1.0 cm×1.5 cm gauze ball made by ourselves to oppress the puncture point. The oozing of the puncture point was observed in patients of the two groups.
Results
The hemostasis was better in the observation group than in the control group(χ2=15.88, P<0.01). No limb swelling happened to the patients in the observation group(χ2=58.064, P<0.01). There was statistically significant difference in hemostatic effect between the two groups.
Conclusion
The sterile gauze ball made by ourselves has a good effect on local hemostasis through oppressing the puncture point without any impact on blood circulation of limbs.
Key words:
Peripherally inserted central catherter; Sterility gauze ball; Local hemostasis
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition was founded in 1993. It is the first professional academic journal (bimonthly) in my country co-sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences to disseminate information on clinical nutrition support, nutrient metabolism, the impact of nutrition support on outcomes and "cost-effectiveness", as well as translational medicine and nutrition research. It is also a professional journal of the Chinese Medical Association's Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Branch.
The purpose of the Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition is to promote the rapid dissemination of knowledge on nutrient metabolism and the rational application of parenteral and enteral nutrition, focusing on the combination of multidisciplinary and multi-regional field investigations and clinical research. It mainly reports on nutritional risk screening related to the indications of parenteral and enteral nutrition support, "cost-effectiveness" research on nutritional drugs, consensus on clinical nutrition, guidelines, expert reviews, randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, glycoprotein and other nutrient metabolism research, systematic evaluation of clinical research, evidence-based case reports, special reviews, case reports and clinical experience exchanges, etc., and has a special column on new technologies related to the field of clinical nutrition and their clinical applications.