彼得后书2:4和犹大书6中的天使之罪

IF 0.6 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION Journal of Biblical Literature Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI:10.1353/jbl.2021.0019
Kim Papaioannou
{"title":"彼得后书2:4和犹大书6中的天使之罪","authors":"Kim Papaioannou","doi":"10.1353/jbl.2021.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The angelic sin of 2 Pet 2:4 and Jude 6 is thought to reflect the Watcher myth of the Book of the Watchers on the grounds of the popularity of the myth in early Judaism and the literary relationship between 1 En. 1:9 and Jude 14–15. A critical reexamination of the evidence, however, suggests contrasting approaches to the myth and a variety of traditions in the Enoch literature undermining both of the above assumptions. The nature of the angelic sin of 2 Pet 2:4 and Jude 6 can best be confirmed on contextual grounds. In this respect, the intentional parallel between examples of punishment and the sins of the false teachers in both 2 Peter and Jude identifies the angelic sin in question as blasphemy—an aspiration to the position of God—in agreement with a long tradition of angelic blasphemy in Jewish and early Christian exposition.","PeriodicalId":15251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Literature","volume":"140 1","pages":"391 - 408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jbl.2021.0019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Sin of the Angels in 2 Peter 2:4 and Jude 6\",\"authors\":\"Kim Papaioannou\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jbl.2021.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The angelic sin of 2 Pet 2:4 and Jude 6 is thought to reflect the Watcher myth of the Book of the Watchers on the grounds of the popularity of the myth in early Judaism and the literary relationship between 1 En. 1:9 and Jude 14–15. A critical reexamination of the evidence, however, suggests contrasting approaches to the myth and a variety of traditions in the Enoch literature undermining both of the above assumptions. The nature of the angelic sin of 2 Pet 2:4 and Jude 6 can best be confirmed on contextual grounds. In this respect, the intentional parallel between examples of punishment and the sins of the false teachers in both 2 Peter and Jude identifies the angelic sin in question as blasphemy—an aspiration to the position of God—in agreement with a long tradition of angelic blasphemy in Jewish and early Christian exposition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biblical Literature\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"391 - 408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jbl.2021.0019\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biblical Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jbl.2021.0019\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jbl.2021.0019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:从《彼得后书》2:4和《犹大书》6中天使的罪恶反映了《守望者之书》的守望者神话在早期犹太教中的流行,以及《恩前书》1:9与《犹大书》14-15之间的文学关系来看。然而,对证据的批判性重新检查表明,以诺文学中的神话和各种传统的对比方法破坏了上述两种假设。《彼得后书》2:4和《犹大书》6中天使之罪的本质可以在上下文中得到最好的证实。在这方面,《彼得后书》和《犹大书》中惩罚的例子和假教师的罪之间有意的相似,将天使的罪视为亵渎——一种对上帝地位的渴望——与犹太教和早期基督教对天使亵渎的长期传统相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Sin of the Angels in 2 Peter 2:4 and Jude 6
Abstract:The angelic sin of 2 Pet 2:4 and Jude 6 is thought to reflect the Watcher myth of the Book of the Watchers on the grounds of the popularity of the myth in early Judaism and the literary relationship between 1 En. 1:9 and Jude 14–15. A critical reexamination of the evidence, however, suggests contrasting approaches to the myth and a variety of traditions in the Enoch literature undermining both of the above assumptions. The nature of the angelic sin of 2 Pet 2:4 and Jude 6 can best be confirmed on contextual grounds. In this respect, the intentional parallel between examples of punishment and the sins of the false teachers in both 2 Peter and Jude identifies the angelic sin in question as blasphemy—an aspiration to the position of God—in agreement with a long tradition of angelic blasphemy in Jewish and early Christian exposition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Getting Rigor Right: A Framework for Methodological Choice in Adaptive Monitoring and Evaluation. Love, Marriage, and a Delayed Harvest: Isaiah 61 as the Reversal of the Song of the Vineyard (5:1–7) Remembering God’s Beloved Son: Jeremiah 38:20 LXX and Mark 1:11 Exotica and the Ethiopian of Acts 8:26–40: Toward a Different Fabula John 21:15–19 as a Prophetic Succession: A Reading in Light of 2 Kings 2:1–18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1