轮盘概率的比较:一项针对小学生的研究

IF 0.6 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Uniciencia Pub Date : 2021-07-31 DOI:10.15359/RU.35-2.9
Luis Armando Hernández-Solís, C. Batanero, M. Gea, R. Álvarez-Arroyo
{"title":"轮盘概率的比较:一项针对小学生的研究","authors":"Luis Armando Hernández-Solís, C. Batanero, M. Gea, R. Álvarez-Arroyo","doi":"10.15359/RU.35-2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to explore the strategies used by Costa Rican primary school students when comparing urn probabilities. The sample was intentional and consisted of 55 6th graders. Using an interpretive approach, we analyzed the children’s responses to a questionnaire of five probability comparison items taken from previous studies, including different levels of proportional reasoning. Results indicate that problems in the first levels of proportional reasoning were solved easily by students, while problems at higher levels increased in difficulty. One-variable strategies, which compare only the favorable or unfavorable cases in both urns, are predominant; although there are correspondence strategies, few students show complete proportional reasoning. Aside from slight variations, results are similar to previous studies, which suggests that this task is influenced more by the child’s level of maturity than the instruction received.","PeriodicalId":42209,"journal":{"name":"Uniciencia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing probabilities in urns: A study with primary school students\",\"authors\":\"Luis Armando Hernández-Solís, C. Batanero, M. Gea, R. Álvarez-Arroyo\",\"doi\":\"10.15359/RU.35-2.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to explore the strategies used by Costa Rican primary school students when comparing urn probabilities. The sample was intentional and consisted of 55 6th graders. Using an interpretive approach, we analyzed the children’s responses to a questionnaire of five probability comparison items taken from previous studies, including different levels of proportional reasoning. Results indicate that problems in the first levels of proportional reasoning were solved easily by students, while problems at higher levels increased in difficulty. One-variable strategies, which compare only the favorable or unfavorable cases in both urns, are predominant; although there are correspondence strategies, few students show complete proportional reasoning. Aside from slight variations, results are similar to previous studies, which suggests that this task is influenced more by the child’s level of maturity than the instruction received.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uniciencia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uniciencia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15359/RU.35-2.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniciencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15359/RU.35-2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

该研究旨在探讨哥斯达黎加小学生在比较urn概率时使用的策略。样本是有意的,由55名六年级学生组成。使用解释方法,我们分析了儿童对之前研究中五个概率比较项目的问卷调查的反应,包括不同水平的比例推理。结果表明,比例推理第一层次的问题学生容易解决,而较高层次的问题难度增加。一变策略占主导地位,只比较urns中有利或不利的情况;尽管有对应策略,但很少有学生表现出完全的比例推理。除了轻微的变化外,结果与之前的研究相似,这表明这项任务更多地受到孩子成熟程度的影响,而不是接受的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing probabilities in urns: A study with primary school students
The study aimed to explore the strategies used by Costa Rican primary school students when comparing urn probabilities. The sample was intentional and consisted of 55 6th graders. Using an interpretive approach, we analyzed the children’s responses to a questionnaire of five probability comparison items taken from previous studies, including different levels of proportional reasoning. Results indicate that problems in the first levels of proportional reasoning were solved easily by students, while problems at higher levels increased in difficulty. One-variable strategies, which compare only the favorable or unfavorable cases in both urns, are predominant; although there are correspondence strategies, few students show complete proportional reasoning. Aside from slight variations, results are similar to previous studies, which suggests that this task is influenced more by the child’s level of maturity than the instruction received.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Uniciencia
Uniciencia MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Guía de valoración de la idoneidad didáctica de procesos de estudio de la diferencial Significados personales en la formulación y argumentación de conjeturas en estudiantes de la escuela secundaria Estructura y composición en un manglar del Pacífico Central de Costa Rica: población de moluscos de interés comercial Analysis of the School Climate Scale in University Environments (ECEAU) Potential for Saving Drinking Water Through the Use of Rainwater in Social Housing in Viçosa-Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1