{"title":"告别客观性:干预与数字新闻专业主义","authors":"Jiang Chang, Huihan Yang","doi":"10.26599/gjms.2023.9330010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 本研究立足于新闻生产实践和理论发展的历史，辨析客观性法则在现代新闻业兴起及主流化的社会语境，呈现新闻业界与学界对客观性法则的质疑与反思，探讨其在数字媒体生态下演进的可能路径。本研究认为，“介入性”及其代表的“行动的文化”具有成为数字时代新闻专业主义价值内核的技术—文化基础；数字新闻业由此不但拥有了感情色彩，而且也拥有了公开的意识形态；客观性的悖论在于以知识权威为生命线的新闻机构无法做到真正的客观，而介入性的悖论则在于受本能驱使的新闻用户的介入行动终究只是在服务于自己的本能。本研究进而提出数字新闻学理论的发展必须要不断检视技术与人性之间的关系，建立解释新闻行动的全新概念体系。\n","PeriodicalId":69715,"journal":{"name":"全球传媒学刊","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Farewel to Objectivity: Intervention and a Digital Journalistic Professionalism\",\"authors\":\"Jiang Chang, Huihan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.26599/gjms.2023.9330010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n 本研究立足于新闻生产实践和理论发展的历史，辨析客观性法则在现代新闻业兴起及主流化的社会语境，呈现新闻业界与学界对客观性法则的质疑与反思，探讨其在数字媒体生态下演进的可能路径。本研究认为，“介入性”及其代表的“行动的文化”具有成为数字时代新闻专业主义价值内核的技术—文化基础；数字新闻业由此不但拥有了感情色彩，而且也拥有了公开的意识形态；客观性的悖论在于以知识权威为生命线的新闻机构无法做到真正的客观，而介入性的悖论则在于受本能驱使的新闻用户的介入行动终究只是在服务于自己的本能。本研究进而提出数字新闻学理论的发展必须要不断检视技术与人性之间的关系，建立解释新闻行动的全新概念体系。\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":69715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"全球传媒学刊\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"全球传媒学刊\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26599/gjms.2023.9330010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"全球传媒学刊","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26599/gjms.2023.9330010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
This study is based on the history of news production practice and theoretical development, analyzing the social context of the rise and mainstream of the rule of objectivity in modern journalism, presenting doubts and reflections on the rule of objectivity in the news industry and academia, and exploring its possible path of evolution in the digital media ecosystem. This study believes that "intervention" and its representative "culture of action" have the technological cultural foundation that becomes the core value of news professionalism in the digital era; As a result, the digital news industry not only has emotional color, but also has an open ideology; The paradox of objectivity lies in the inability of news organizations with knowledge authority as their lifeline to achieve true objectivity, while the paradox of intervention lies in the fact that the intervention actions of news users driven by instinct are ultimately only serving their own instincts. This study further proposes that the development of digital journalism theory must continuously examine the relationship between technology and human nature, and establish a new conceptual system to explain news actions.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
