伊斯兰研究:跨文化交火下的研究领域

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY Transcultural Studies Pub Date : 2017-04-07 DOI:10.17885/heiup.ts.2016.2.23600
Daniel G. König
{"title":"伊斯兰研究:跨文化交火下的研究领域","authors":"Daniel G. König","doi":"10.17885/heiup.ts.2016.2.23600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article gauges the transcultural character and disposition of Islamic Studies, a discipline of European origins that emerged in the early modern period and has been accused of catering to the needs of a colonial and imperialist agenda. It establishes that a discipline with a history of formulating largely non-Muslim Western perceptions on non-Western societies marked by Islam, whose object of study is a religious orbit that transcends ethnic and political boundaries, can be regarded as transcultural per se . This does not mean, however, that the transcultural approach—presented here as a methodological tool for conceptual deconstruction and a multiplication of scales and perspectives of analysis—will be accepted by intellectuals and ideologues in Western and Muslim societies alike. Discussing various potential anti-reactions to the transcultural approach, the article concludes that such criticism cannot erase the many forms of interpenetration that have marked and will continue to mark future relations between Islam and the West. In view of this, the transcultural approach seems to be of high relevance to understand past, present, and future processes of interaction, entanglement, and hybridization.","PeriodicalId":42064,"journal":{"name":"Transcultural Studies","volume":"2016 1","pages":"101-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Islamic Studies : A Field of Research Under Transcultural Crossfire\",\"authors\":\"Daniel G. König\",\"doi\":\"10.17885/heiup.ts.2016.2.23600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article gauges the transcultural character and disposition of Islamic Studies, a discipline of European origins that emerged in the early modern period and has been accused of catering to the needs of a colonial and imperialist agenda. It establishes that a discipline with a history of formulating largely non-Muslim Western perceptions on non-Western societies marked by Islam, whose object of study is a religious orbit that transcends ethnic and political boundaries, can be regarded as transcultural per se . This does not mean, however, that the transcultural approach—presented here as a methodological tool for conceptual deconstruction and a multiplication of scales and perspectives of analysis—will be accepted by intellectuals and ideologues in Western and Muslim societies alike. Discussing various potential anti-reactions to the transcultural approach, the article concludes that such criticism cannot erase the many forms of interpenetration that have marked and will continue to mark future relations between Islam and the West. In view of this, the transcultural approach seems to be of high relevance to understand past, present, and future processes of interaction, entanglement, and hybridization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transcultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"101-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transcultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17885/heiup.ts.2016.2.23600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17885/heiup.ts.2016.2.23600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章衡量了伊斯兰研究的跨文化特征和倾向,伊斯兰研究是一门起源于欧洲的学科,出现在现代早期,被指责为迎合殖民主义和帝国主义议程的需要。它规定,一门学科在很大程度上形成了非穆斯林西方对以伊斯兰教为标志的非西方社会的看法,其研究对象是超越种族和政治界限的宗教轨道,这门学科本身可以被视为跨文化学科。然而,这并不意味着跨文化方法——作为概念解构的方法论工具,以及分析尺度和视角的倍增——将被西方和穆斯林社会的知识分子和理论家所接受。在讨论对跨文化方法的各种潜在反反应时,文章得出结论,这种批评不能抹杀已经标志着并将继续标志着伊斯兰与西方未来关系的许多形式的相互渗透。有鉴于此,跨文化方法似乎与理解过去、现在和未来的互动、纠缠和杂交过程具有高度相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Islamic Studies : A Field of Research Under Transcultural Crossfire
This article gauges the transcultural character and disposition of Islamic Studies, a discipline of European origins that emerged in the early modern period and has been accused of catering to the needs of a colonial and imperialist agenda. It establishes that a discipline with a history of formulating largely non-Muslim Western perceptions on non-Western societies marked by Islam, whose object of study is a religious orbit that transcends ethnic and political boundaries, can be regarded as transcultural per se . This does not mean, however, that the transcultural approach—presented here as a methodological tool for conceptual deconstruction and a multiplication of scales and perspectives of analysis—will be accepted by intellectuals and ideologues in Western and Muslim societies alike. Discussing various potential anti-reactions to the transcultural approach, the article concludes that such criticism cannot erase the many forms of interpenetration that have marked and will continue to mark future relations between Islam and the West. In view of this, the transcultural approach seems to be of high relevance to understand past, present, and future processes of interaction, entanglement, and hybridization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transcultural Studies is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal committed to promoting the knowledge and research of transculturality in all disciplines. It is published by the Cluster of Excellence “Asia and Europe in a Global Context: The Dynamics of Transculturality” of the Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.
期刊最新文献
An Interview with Robert Quinn, Founding Executive Director of the Global Network Scholars at Risk Introduction (français) L’enseignement supérieur au cœur de la tourmente libanaise Academic Freedom, Autonomy of Universities: Turning Point in the Evolution of Industrial Societies Benny Tai – Testing the Bottom-Line of Academic Freedom and Freedom of Expression in Hong Kong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1