朝鲜同胞是“朝鲜人”吗?李承晚时代韩国民族主义的三次分化(1948-60)

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Korean Studies Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1215/21581665-7258094
Bumsoo Kim
{"title":"朝鲜同胞是“朝鲜人”吗?李承晚时代韩国民族主义的三次分化(1948-60)","authors":"Bumsoo Kim","doi":"10.1215/21581665-7258094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Focusing on the question of whether South Koreans' notion of \"we, the people of Korea\" (uri taehan kungmin) included North Korean compatriots or not, this study examines the trifurcation of ethnic nationalism in South Korea during the Syngman Rhee era (1948–1960). Specifically, by analyzing columns and editorials of three Korean newspapers, Chosŏn ilbo, Tonga ilbo, and Kyŏnghyang sinmun, this study reveals that, following the division of Korea (1948), Korean nationalism trifurcated, at least in South Korea, into three different but closely related versions, each of which did not deny that historically all Koreans belonged to the same nation, but defined \"we, the people of Korea\" differently: (1) tanil minjok (one nation) nationalism, which included not only South Koreans but also North Korean compatriots in \"we, the people of Korea\"; (2) anticommunist nationalism, which included South Koreans and \"patriotic compatriots\" of North Korea in \"we, the people of Korea\" while excluding North Korean \"commies\"; and (3) Taehan Min'guk (the great ROK) nationalism, which identified only South Koreans as \"we, the people of Korea.\" In doing so, this study suggests that, as the division of Korea solidified after the Korean War, South Koreans began to \"imagine\" themselves as a different national community, separated from North Korean compatriots.","PeriodicalId":43322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are North Korean Compatriots \\\"Korean\\\"? The Trifurcation of Ethnic Nationalism in South Korea during the Syngman Rhee Era (1948–60)\",\"authors\":\"Bumsoo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/21581665-7258094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Focusing on the question of whether South Koreans' notion of \\\"we, the people of Korea\\\" (uri taehan kungmin) included North Korean compatriots or not, this study examines the trifurcation of ethnic nationalism in South Korea during the Syngman Rhee era (1948–1960). Specifically, by analyzing columns and editorials of three Korean newspapers, Chosŏn ilbo, Tonga ilbo, and Kyŏnghyang sinmun, this study reveals that, following the division of Korea (1948), Korean nationalism trifurcated, at least in South Korea, into three different but closely related versions, each of which did not deny that historically all Koreans belonged to the same nation, but defined \\\"we, the people of Korea\\\" differently: (1) tanil minjok (one nation) nationalism, which included not only South Koreans but also North Korean compatriots in \\\"we, the people of Korea\\\"; (2) anticommunist nationalism, which included South Koreans and \\\"patriotic compatriots\\\" of North Korea in \\\"we, the people of Korea\\\" while excluding North Korean \\\"commies\\\"; and (3) Taehan Min'guk (the great ROK) nationalism, which identified only South Koreans as \\\"we, the people of Korea.\\\" In doing so, this study suggests that, as the division of Korea solidified after the Korean War, South Koreans began to \\\"imagine\\\" themselves as a different national community, separated from North Korean compatriots.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/21581665-7258094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/21581665-7258094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本研究围绕韩国人的“我们朝鲜人民”(uri taehan kungmin)概念是否包括朝鲜同胞的问题,考察了李承晚时代(1948-1960)韩国民族主义的三个分支。具体而言,通过分析Chosŏn日报、汤加日报和Kyŏnghyang新报的专栏和社论,本研究发现,在朝鲜半岛分裂(1948年)之后,至少在韩国,朝鲜民族主义一分为三,分为三个不同但密切相关的版本,每个版本都不否认所有朝鲜人在历史上属于同一个民族,但对“我们,朝鲜人民”的定义不同:(1)统一民族主义,不仅包括韩国人,也包括“我们朝鲜人民”中的朝鲜同胞;(2)反共民族主义,将韩国人和朝鲜的“爱国同胞”包括在“我们朝鲜人民”中,而将朝鲜的“共产主义”排除在外;(3)大韩国民族主义(Taehan Min’guk),只把韩国人定义为“我们,韩国人民”。在此过程中,这项研究表明,随着朝鲜战争后朝鲜半岛分裂的巩固,韩国人开始“想象”自己是一个不同的民族共同体,与朝鲜同胞分开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are North Korean Compatriots "Korean"? The Trifurcation of Ethnic Nationalism in South Korea during the Syngman Rhee Era (1948–60)
Abstract:Focusing on the question of whether South Koreans' notion of "we, the people of Korea" (uri taehan kungmin) included North Korean compatriots or not, this study examines the trifurcation of ethnic nationalism in South Korea during the Syngman Rhee era (1948–1960). Specifically, by analyzing columns and editorials of three Korean newspapers, Chosŏn ilbo, Tonga ilbo, and Kyŏnghyang sinmun, this study reveals that, following the division of Korea (1948), Korean nationalism trifurcated, at least in South Korea, into three different but closely related versions, each of which did not deny that historically all Koreans belonged to the same nation, but defined "we, the people of Korea" differently: (1) tanil minjok (one nation) nationalism, which included not only South Koreans but also North Korean compatriots in "we, the people of Korea"; (2) anticommunist nationalism, which included South Koreans and "patriotic compatriots" of North Korea in "we, the people of Korea" while excluding North Korean "commies"; and (3) Taehan Min'guk (the great ROK) nationalism, which identified only South Koreans as "we, the people of Korea." In doing so, this study suggests that, as the division of Korea solidified after the Korean War, South Koreans began to "imagine" themselves as a different national community, separated from North Korean compatriots.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note The Diary of 1636: The Second Manchu Invasion of Korea The South Korean Military Ideological Complex: Transcendent Nationalism in Military Moral Education Beyond Double Identity, beyond Periphery: Chinese Ethnic Korean Poetry as Borderland Literature The Checkpoint of History: Testimony and Intertextuality in the Documentary Literature of the Korean War, 1960s–1970s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1