“他们以为自己是谁?”:农村小社区的社会认同与冲突

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Rural Society Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10371656.2022.2061723
Saleena Ham, G. Woolcock
{"title":"“他们以为自己是谁?”:农村小社区的社会认同与冲突","authors":"Saleena Ham, G. Woolcock","doi":"10.1080/10371656.2022.2061723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Building resilience in small communities has increasingly become an aspirational objective to help adapt to challenging economic and social change. Communities with identified resilience traits are seen to be better equipped to survive and thrive in adversity. Resilience relies on embracing change and social cohesion. However, the divide between social groups of “insiders” and “outsiders” in small communities can divide and suppress resident contributions and participation. This qualitative research in two small South Queensland, Australian towns, population under 2000, interviewed 89 residents using social identity theory and discourse analysis to analyse data. It found social identity phenomena-motivated antisocial behaviours including withheld support, exclusion, derision, criticism, shame/blame gossip, and attack, directly and indirectly. In the research communities, witnessing or experiencing social hostility created hesitation to lead, speak, participate, or innovate without social support, and led to withdrawal, burnout, and departure.","PeriodicalId":45685,"journal":{"name":"Rural Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Who do they think they are?”: social identity & conflict in small rural community\",\"authors\":\"Saleena Ham, G. Woolcock\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10371656.2022.2061723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Building resilience in small communities has increasingly become an aspirational objective to help adapt to challenging economic and social change. Communities with identified resilience traits are seen to be better equipped to survive and thrive in adversity. Resilience relies on embracing change and social cohesion. However, the divide between social groups of “insiders” and “outsiders” in small communities can divide and suppress resident contributions and participation. This qualitative research in two small South Queensland, Australian towns, population under 2000, interviewed 89 residents using social identity theory and discourse analysis to analyse data. It found social identity phenomena-motivated antisocial behaviours including withheld support, exclusion, derision, criticism, shame/blame gossip, and attack, directly and indirectly. In the research communities, witnessing or experiencing social hostility created hesitation to lead, speak, participate, or innovate without social support, and led to withdrawal, burnout, and departure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2022.2061723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2022.2061723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在小型社区中建立弹性已日益成为一个理想的目标,以帮助适应具有挑战性的经济和社会变革。具有适应力特征的社区被认为更有能力在逆境中生存和发展。韧性依赖于拥抱变革和社会凝聚力。然而,在小社区中,“局内人”和“局外人”社会群体之间的分歧可能会分裂和压制居民的贡献和参与。本定性研究在两个小的南昆士兰,澳大利亚城镇,人口2000以下,采访了89名居民使用社会认同理论和话语分析来分析数据。研究发现,由社会认同现象引发的反社会行为包括拒绝支持、排斥、嘲笑、批评、羞辱/指责八卦以及直接或间接的攻击。在研究群体中,目睹或经历社会敌意会在没有社会支持的情况下导致领导、发言、参与或创新的犹豫,并导致退缩、倦怠和离职。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Who do they think they are?”: social identity & conflict in small rural community
ABSTRACT Building resilience in small communities has increasingly become an aspirational objective to help adapt to challenging economic and social change. Communities with identified resilience traits are seen to be better equipped to survive and thrive in adversity. Resilience relies on embracing change and social cohesion. However, the divide between social groups of “insiders” and “outsiders” in small communities can divide and suppress resident contributions and participation. This qualitative research in two small South Queensland, Australian towns, population under 2000, interviewed 89 residents using social identity theory and discourse analysis to analyse data. It found social identity phenomena-motivated antisocial behaviours including withheld support, exclusion, derision, criticism, shame/blame gossip, and attack, directly and indirectly. In the research communities, witnessing or experiencing social hostility created hesitation to lead, speak, participate, or innovate without social support, and led to withdrawal, burnout, and departure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural Society
Rural Society SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Farm Finance: A Practical Guide for Broadacre Graziers Taoid: communal heritage tourism through a multi-stakeholder approach in the Philippines The WEF nexus and rural household security in Zimbabwe and South Africa Visibility and representation of rural schools in the online Spanish press Social quality based on ecotourism and creative economy in a language tourism village in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1