电影作为/和流行的社会文本:约翰·特伦戈夫的《因克塞巴》/《伤口》和瓦努里·卡惠的《拉菲基》的接受

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS ENGLISH IN AFRICA Pub Date : 2021-02-10 DOI:10.4314/EIA.V47I3.4S
G. Ncube
{"title":"电影作为/和流行的社会文本:约翰·特伦戈夫的《因克塞巴》/《伤口》和瓦努里·卡惠的《拉菲基》的接受","authors":"G. Ncube","doi":"10.4314/EIA.V47I3.4S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is interested in popular and institutional or state responses to the representations of queerness offered in the films Inxeba/The Wound (South Africa, 2017) and Rafiki (Kenya, 2018). Aside from portraying the marked homophobia that continues to circulate on the African continent, the institutional and state responses to the films have overshadowed the positive popular reception which has  characterised conversations around the films on social media and public spaces. This article shows how social media functions as animportant space of contestation for diverse issues relating to non-normative gender and sexual identities. As these films circulate in different spaces and are viewed by diverse audiences, they elicit equally diverse reactions and responses. The article examines how viewers, in Africa and beyond, receive and engage with the queerness represented in the two films. It argues that the multifaceted reactions to Inxeba/The Wound and Rafiki are central to articulating important questions about what it means to be queer in Africa,and particularly what it implies for black queers to inhabit heteronormative and patriarchal spaces on the continent. Through an analysis of the reactions and receptions of the two films in Africa and the global North, it is argued that it is possible to trace important inter-regional, intra-continental and intercontinental dialogues and conversations regarding the representation of queer African subjectivities. The intra-continental and inter-continental dialogues bring to light questions of gaze and viewing that are inherent in the circulation of queer-themed films. \nKewords: Inxeba/The Wound, Rafiki, reception, popular culture, queerness","PeriodicalId":41428,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH IN AFRICA","volume":"47 1","pages":"55-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Film as /and Popular Social Text: The Reception of John Trengove’s Inxeba/The Wound and Wanuri Kahui’s Rafiki\",\"authors\":\"G. Ncube\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/EIA.V47I3.4S\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is interested in popular and institutional or state responses to the representations of queerness offered in the films Inxeba/The Wound (South Africa, 2017) and Rafiki (Kenya, 2018). Aside from portraying the marked homophobia that continues to circulate on the African continent, the institutional and state responses to the films have overshadowed the positive popular reception which has  characterised conversations around the films on social media and public spaces. This article shows how social media functions as animportant space of contestation for diverse issues relating to non-normative gender and sexual identities. As these films circulate in different spaces and are viewed by diverse audiences, they elicit equally diverse reactions and responses. The article examines how viewers, in Africa and beyond, receive and engage with the queerness represented in the two films. It argues that the multifaceted reactions to Inxeba/The Wound and Rafiki are central to articulating important questions about what it means to be queer in Africa,and particularly what it implies for black queers to inhabit heteronormative and patriarchal spaces on the continent. Through an analysis of the reactions and receptions of the two films in Africa and the global North, it is argued that it is possible to trace important inter-regional, intra-continental and intercontinental dialogues and conversations regarding the representation of queer African subjectivities. The intra-continental and inter-continental dialogues bring to light questions of gaze and viewing that are inherent in the circulation of queer-themed films. \\nKewords: Inxeba/The Wound, Rafiki, reception, popular culture, queerness\",\"PeriodicalId\":41428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENGLISH IN AFRICA\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"55-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENGLISH IN AFRICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/EIA.V47I3.4S\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH IN AFRICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/EIA.V47I3.4S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇文章感兴趣的是大众和机构或国家对电影《Inxeba/伤口》(南非,2017)和《Rafiki》(肯尼亚,2018)中所提供的酷儿形象的回应。除了描绘了在非洲大陆继续流传的明显的恐同情绪外,机构和国家对这些电影的反应也盖过了社交媒体和公共空间上围绕这些电影进行的对话所带来的积极的公众反响。这篇文章展示了社交媒体如何作为与非规范性别和性身份相关的各种问题的重要竞争空间。当这些电影在不同的空间传播,被不同的观众观看时,它们会引起同样不同的反应和反应。这篇文章探讨了非洲及其他地区的观众如何接受和参与这两部电影中所表现的怪异。它认为,对Inxeba/the Wound和Rafiki的多方面反应是阐明非洲酷儿意味着什么的重要问题的核心,尤其是黑人酷儿居住在非洲大陆的非规范和父权空间意味着什么。通过分析这两部电影在非洲和全球北方的反应和接受,可以追溯到关于酷儿非洲主观主义表现的重要区域间、大陆内和洲际对话和对话。大陆内部和大陆之间的对话揭示了酷儿主题电影发行中固有的凝视和观看问题。关键词:Inxeba/创伤,Rafiki,接待,流行文化,酷儿
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Film as /and Popular Social Text: The Reception of John Trengove’s Inxeba/The Wound and Wanuri Kahui’s Rafiki
This article is interested in popular and institutional or state responses to the representations of queerness offered in the films Inxeba/The Wound (South Africa, 2017) and Rafiki (Kenya, 2018). Aside from portraying the marked homophobia that continues to circulate on the African continent, the institutional and state responses to the films have overshadowed the positive popular reception which has  characterised conversations around the films on social media and public spaces. This article shows how social media functions as animportant space of contestation for diverse issues relating to non-normative gender and sexual identities. As these films circulate in different spaces and are viewed by diverse audiences, they elicit equally diverse reactions and responses. The article examines how viewers, in Africa and beyond, receive and engage with the queerness represented in the two films. It argues that the multifaceted reactions to Inxeba/The Wound and Rafiki are central to articulating important questions about what it means to be queer in Africa,and particularly what it implies for black queers to inhabit heteronormative and patriarchal spaces on the continent. Through an analysis of the reactions and receptions of the two films in Africa and the global North, it is argued that it is possible to trace important inter-regional, intra-continental and intercontinental dialogues and conversations regarding the representation of queer African subjectivities. The intra-continental and inter-continental dialogues bring to light questions of gaze and viewing that are inherent in the circulation of queer-themed films. Kewords: Inxeba/The Wound, Rafiki, reception, popular culture, queerness
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ENGLISH IN AFRICA
ENGLISH IN AFRICA LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Flown Away: Eva Bezwoda’s Life, Death and Poetry “Doing very well in South Africa”: Fiona Melrose, Karel Schoeman, and the Intertextual Afterlives of Woolf ’s Review Some Early Soyinka Letters South Africa-sur-Nemunas1 : Transnational Hinterlands in Dan Jacobson’s Heshel’s Kingdom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1