一项比较布比卡因和罗哌卡因无痛分娩疗效的双盲随机临床试验

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care Pub Date : 2021-11-05 DOI:10.35975/APIC.V25I3.1146
A. Kamali, Narges Anousheh, M. Shokrpour, S. Pazouki
{"title":"一项比较布比卡因和罗哌卡因无痛分娩疗效的双盲随机临床试验","authors":"A. Kamali, Narges Anousheh, M. Shokrpour, S. Pazouki","doi":"10.35975/APIC.V25I3.1146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & objective: Childbirth is an important phenomenon in the life of the mother and although this experience is the wish of every mother, it also concerns her due to the labor pain and the possible dangers that threaten her. There are several medications for painless delivery, such as epidural analgesia with the help of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of painless delivery with epidural method by bupivacaine and ropivacaine in women candidates for painless delivery. \nMethodology: This study is a double blind randomized clinical trial. In this study, patients were randomly divided into two equal groups of bupivacaine and ropivacaine using cubic random method. The demographic data, incidence of cesarean section and mean birth phases were evaluated. Finally, data were analyzed using SPSS 22 software, ANOVA and T-test. \nResults: A total of 112 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean active phase of labor, mean Apgar score of min 1 and 5, incidence of cesarean section and mothers motor block score, but the mean of the second phase of labor and mean use of delivery helping instruments (such as forceps and vacuum) were lower in the ropivacaine group. Also, the mean score of patients' satisfaction was higher in ropivacaine group. \nConclusion: It could be concluded that the combination of ropivacaine and fentanyl versus the combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl was a very suitable combination for controlling labor pain by epidural method, while it did not increase the rate of cesarean section and did not have a negative effect on neonatal Apgar scores of min 1 and 5, it had a significant effect on decreasing the mean of second stage of labor, decreasing the use of delivery helping instruments and increasing patient satisfaction score. \nKey words: Bupivacaine; Ropivacaine; Epidural analgesia; Painless delivery \nCitation: Anousheh N, Shokrpour M, Pazouki S, Kamali A. A double blind randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for painless delivery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(3): 274–279.  DOI: doi.org/10.35975/apic.v25i3.1146 \nReceived: November 2, 2020, Reviewed: February 22, 2021, Accepted: March 26, 2021","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A double blind randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for painless delivery\",\"authors\":\"A. Kamali, Narges Anousheh, M. Shokrpour, S. Pazouki\",\"doi\":\"10.35975/APIC.V25I3.1146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & objective: Childbirth is an important phenomenon in the life of the mother and although this experience is the wish of every mother, it also concerns her due to the labor pain and the possible dangers that threaten her. There are several medications for painless delivery, such as epidural analgesia with the help of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of painless delivery with epidural method by bupivacaine and ropivacaine in women candidates for painless delivery. \\nMethodology: This study is a double blind randomized clinical trial. In this study, patients were randomly divided into two equal groups of bupivacaine and ropivacaine using cubic random method. The demographic data, incidence of cesarean section and mean birth phases were evaluated. Finally, data were analyzed using SPSS 22 software, ANOVA and T-test. \\nResults: A total of 112 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean active phase of labor, mean Apgar score of min 1 and 5, incidence of cesarean section and mothers motor block score, but the mean of the second phase of labor and mean use of delivery helping instruments (such as forceps and vacuum) were lower in the ropivacaine group. Also, the mean score of patients' satisfaction was higher in ropivacaine group. \\nConclusion: It could be concluded that the combination of ropivacaine and fentanyl versus the combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl was a very suitable combination for controlling labor pain by epidural method, while it did not increase the rate of cesarean section and did not have a negative effect on neonatal Apgar scores of min 1 and 5, it had a significant effect on decreasing the mean of second stage of labor, decreasing the use of delivery helping instruments and increasing patient satisfaction score. \\nKey words: Bupivacaine; Ropivacaine; Epidural analgesia; Painless delivery \\nCitation: Anousheh N, Shokrpour M, Pazouki S, Kamali A. A double blind randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for painless delivery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(3): 274–279.  DOI: doi.org/10.35975/apic.v25i3.1146 \\nReceived: November 2, 2020, Reviewed: February 22, 2021, Accepted: March 26, 2021\",\"PeriodicalId\":7735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35975/APIC.V25I3.1146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35975/APIC.V25I3.1146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景与目的:分娩是母亲生命中的一个重要现象,虽然这种经历是每个母亲的愿望,但由于分娩的疼痛和可能威胁到她的危险,分娩也让她感到担忧。有几种无痛分娩药物,如布比卡因和罗哌卡因的硬膜外镇痛。本研究的目的是比较布比卡因和罗哌卡因硬膜外无痛分娩对女性无痛分娩的疗效。方法:本研究为双盲随机临床试验。本研究采用立方随机法将患者随机分为布比卡因和罗哌卡因两组。对人口统计资料、剖宫产发生率和平均产期进行评估。最后,采用SPSS 22软件、方差分析和t检验对数据进行分析。结果:共有112例患者入组。两组在平均产程活跃期、平均Apgar评分min 1分和min 5分、剖宫产发生率和母亲运动阻滞评分方面差异无统计学意义,但罗哌卡因组第二产程平均值和产钳、吸尘等助产器具的平均使用较低。罗哌卡因组患者满意度平均得分较高。结论:由此可见,罗哌卡因联合芬太尼与布比卡因联合芬太尼相比,是一种非常适合硬膜外法控制分娩疼痛的组合,且不增加剖宫产率,对新生儿Apgar分分1分和5分没有负面影响,对降低第二产程平均有显著作用。减少助产器械的使用,提高患者满意度。关键词:布比卡因;Ropivacaine;硬膜外镇痛;引用本文:Anousheh N, Shokrpour M, Pazouki S, Kamali A.一项比较布比卡因和罗哌卡因无痛分娩疗效的双盲随机临床试验。Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2021;25(3):274-279。收稿日期:2020年11月2日,审稿日期:2021年2月22日,接受日期:2021年3月26日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A double blind randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for painless delivery
Background & objective: Childbirth is an important phenomenon in the life of the mother and although this experience is the wish of every mother, it also concerns her due to the labor pain and the possible dangers that threaten her. There are several medications for painless delivery, such as epidural analgesia with the help of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of painless delivery with epidural method by bupivacaine and ropivacaine in women candidates for painless delivery. Methodology: This study is a double blind randomized clinical trial. In this study, patients were randomly divided into two equal groups of bupivacaine and ropivacaine using cubic random method. The demographic data, incidence of cesarean section and mean birth phases were evaluated. Finally, data were analyzed using SPSS 22 software, ANOVA and T-test. Results: A total of 112 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean active phase of labor, mean Apgar score of min 1 and 5, incidence of cesarean section and mothers motor block score, but the mean of the second phase of labor and mean use of delivery helping instruments (such as forceps and vacuum) were lower in the ropivacaine group. Also, the mean score of patients' satisfaction was higher in ropivacaine group. Conclusion: It could be concluded that the combination of ropivacaine and fentanyl versus the combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl was a very suitable combination for controlling labor pain by epidural method, while it did not increase the rate of cesarean section and did not have a negative effect on neonatal Apgar scores of min 1 and 5, it had a significant effect on decreasing the mean of second stage of labor, decreasing the use of delivery helping instruments and increasing patient satisfaction score. Key words: Bupivacaine; Ropivacaine; Epidural analgesia; Painless delivery Citation: Anousheh N, Shokrpour M, Pazouki S, Kamali A. A double blind randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for painless delivery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(3): 274–279.  DOI: doi.org/10.35975/apic.v25i3.1146 Received: November 2, 2020, Reviewed: February 22, 2021, Accepted: March 26, 2021
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
NSAIDs in COVID-19, friend or foe? Post cervical spine surgery hyperpyrexia (108?F) in a patient with COVID-19: a case report Extreme physical exhaustion leading to hypokalemic periodic paralysis- a case report Difficult airway management in Apert syndrome for maxillofacial reconstruction: a case report Anesthesia without opioids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1