《帝国的托儿所:儿童文学与美国世纪的起源》作者:布莱恩·鲁罗(书评)

C. Nesmith
{"title":"《帝国的托儿所:儿童文学与美国世纪的起源》作者:布莱恩·鲁罗(书评)","authors":"C. Nesmith","doi":"10.1353/chq.2023.a905635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Book Reviews well-behaved, and diligent child and the imperfect yet cute, “child-like” youngster. The last chapter, “Writing the Self,” transfers this concept from letters to diaries. Similar to the letters, diaries are read as a medium of both pedagogical strategies and a means of self-fashioning. These chapters are lined up in a generally chronological order; they also, however, lead the reader from reading material created for children to texts written by children. Bruce picks up on a fundamental problem of the field, and probably all historians of childhood will feel sympathetic towards her difficulties in the endeavor to find suitable and manageable sources. She deals with this problem in creative ways, by reading the periodicals, books, and tales as scripts that would reflect on and prescribe children’s lives. Bruce also works with children’s notes and marginalia in textbooks, certainly an innovative approach. In the last two chapters, she analyzes letters and diaries written by children. However, her conclusions about children being active participants in their own education, reflecting their own personal development and fashioning a “modern self,” remain somewhat vague. The framing within an “Age of Revolution” could have been explained more in-depth and used in more fruitful ways. In a similar vein, the relation between a general history of media, reading, and writing on the one hand and the role of children and childhood within these processes would have deserved a closer look. Ultimately, the often-repeated phrases of the modern child, the modern self, and subjectivity appear at times indiscriminate and formulaic. Bruce provides innovative, diligent, and valuable work (in particular the detailed tracing of several versions and editions is impressive), but the analysis at times seems to come to a halt too soon. In fact, the author’s decision to divide her chapters in very small sections supports this impression—I have been disappointed by the abrupt stop to a train of thought more than once. This is a book with tremendous potential which, unfortunately, has not always been redeemed. Nevertheless, Bruce has written an interesting, readable, and inspiring study.","PeriodicalId":40856,"journal":{"name":"Childrens Literature Association Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empire’s Nursery: Children’s Literature and the Origins of the American Century by Brian Rouleau (review)\",\"authors\":\"C. Nesmith\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/chq.2023.a905635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Book Reviews well-behaved, and diligent child and the imperfect yet cute, “child-like” youngster. The last chapter, “Writing the Self,” transfers this concept from letters to diaries. Similar to the letters, diaries are read as a medium of both pedagogical strategies and a means of self-fashioning. These chapters are lined up in a generally chronological order; they also, however, lead the reader from reading material created for children to texts written by children. Bruce picks up on a fundamental problem of the field, and probably all historians of childhood will feel sympathetic towards her difficulties in the endeavor to find suitable and manageable sources. She deals with this problem in creative ways, by reading the periodicals, books, and tales as scripts that would reflect on and prescribe children’s lives. Bruce also works with children’s notes and marginalia in textbooks, certainly an innovative approach. In the last two chapters, she analyzes letters and diaries written by children. However, her conclusions about children being active participants in their own education, reflecting their own personal development and fashioning a “modern self,” remain somewhat vague. The framing within an “Age of Revolution” could have been explained more in-depth and used in more fruitful ways. In a similar vein, the relation between a general history of media, reading, and writing on the one hand and the role of children and childhood within these processes would have deserved a closer look. Ultimately, the often-repeated phrases of the modern child, the modern self, and subjectivity appear at times indiscriminate and formulaic. Bruce provides innovative, diligent, and valuable work (in particular the detailed tracing of several versions and editions is impressive), but the analysis at times seems to come to a halt too soon. In fact, the author’s decision to divide her chapters in very small sections supports this impression—I have been disappointed by the abrupt stop to a train of thought more than once. This is a book with tremendous potential which, unfortunately, has not always been redeemed. Nevertheless, Bruce has written an interesting, readable, and inspiring study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Childrens Literature Association Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Childrens Literature Association Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/chq.2023.a905635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childrens Literature Association Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/chq.2023.a905635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

书评表现良好、勤奋的孩子和不完美但可爱、“像孩子一样”的年轻人。最后一章“书写自我”将这一概念从信件转移到日记中。与信件类似,日记被解读为教学策略的媒介和自我塑造的手段。这些章节通常按时间顺序排列;然而,它们也引导读者从为儿童创作的阅读材料转向儿童编写的文本。布鲁斯发现了这个领域的一个根本问题,也许所有童年历史学家都会对她在寻找合适和可管理的来源方面遇到的困难表示同情。她以创造性的方式处理这个问题,将期刊、书籍和故事作为剧本来阅读,以反映和规定儿童的生活。Bruce还研究了儿童笔记和课本中的边缘化,这无疑是一种创新的方法。在最后两章中,她分析了孩子们写的信件和日记。然而,她关于儿童积极参与自己的教育、反映自己的个人发展和形成“现代自我”的结论仍然有些模糊。“革命时代”的框架本可以得到更深入的解释,并以更富有成效的方式使用。同样,媒体、阅读和写作的一般历史与儿童和童年在这些过程中的作用之间的关系值得仔细研究。最终,现代儿童、现代自我和主体性的经常重复的短语有时显得不分青红皂白和公式化。Bruce提供了创新、勤奋和有价值的工作(特别是对几个版本和版本的详细追踪令人印象深刻),但分析有时似乎过早停止。事实上,作者决定将她的章节分成很小的部分,这支持了这种印象——我不止一次对突然停止思考感到失望。这是一本具有巨大潜力的书,但不幸的是,这本书并不总是能得到救赎。尽管如此,Bruce还是写了一篇有趣的、可读的、鼓舞人心的研究报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empire’s Nursery: Children’s Literature and the Origins of the American Century by Brian Rouleau (review)
Book Reviews well-behaved, and diligent child and the imperfect yet cute, “child-like” youngster. The last chapter, “Writing the Self,” transfers this concept from letters to diaries. Similar to the letters, diaries are read as a medium of both pedagogical strategies and a means of self-fashioning. These chapters are lined up in a generally chronological order; they also, however, lead the reader from reading material created for children to texts written by children. Bruce picks up on a fundamental problem of the field, and probably all historians of childhood will feel sympathetic towards her difficulties in the endeavor to find suitable and manageable sources. She deals with this problem in creative ways, by reading the periodicals, books, and tales as scripts that would reflect on and prescribe children’s lives. Bruce also works with children’s notes and marginalia in textbooks, certainly an innovative approach. In the last two chapters, she analyzes letters and diaries written by children. However, her conclusions about children being active participants in their own education, reflecting their own personal development and fashioning a “modern self,” remain somewhat vague. The framing within an “Age of Revolution” could have been explained more in-depth and used in more fruitful ways. In a similar vein, the relation between a general history of media, reading, and writing on the one hand and the role of children and childhood within these processes would have deserved a closer look. Ultimately, the often-repeated phrases of the modern child, the modern self, and subjectivity appear at times indiscriminate and formulaic. Bruce provides innovative, diligent, and valuable work (in particular the detailed tracing of several versions and editions is impressive), but the analysis at times seems to come to a halt too soon. In fact, the author’s decision to divide her chapters in very small sections supports this impression—I have been disappointed by the abrupt stop to a train of thought more than once. This is a book with tremendous potential which, unfortunately, has not always been redeemed. Nevertheless, Bruce has written an interesting, readable, and inspiring study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Primate Visionary: Peter Dickinson’s Eva and the Environmental Uncanny Childhood Diaries of a British Girl and a British Boy, 1899–1924: Drawing Some Conclusions East of the Wardrobe: The Unexpected Worlds of C.S. Lewis by Warwick Ball (review) Revolutions at Home: The Origin of Modern Childhood and the German Middle Class by Emily C. Bruce (review) To Begin Again: Known Paths and New Routes of Exploration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1