消化性溃疡穿孔评分的评估:农村三级医疗机构消化性溃疡溃疡穿孔后死亡率的预测因素

LV Simhachalam Kutikuppala, TarakaKrishna Nulukurthi, Balaji Karnasula, RHemanth Kumar Chowdary, JyothiSwaroop Chintala
{"title":"消化性溃疡穿孔评分的评估:农村三级医疗机构消化性溃疡溃疡穿孔后死亡率的预测因素","authors":"LV Simhachalam Kutikuppala, TarakaKrishna Nulukurthi, Balaji Karnasula, RHemanth Kumar Chowdary, JyothiSwaroop Chintala","doi":"10.4103/amhs.amhs_248_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Peptic ulcers (PUs) result from the increased aggressive or decreased protective elements in the stomach or duodenum, which can gradually cause mucosal damage and ulceration. The risk of death as a consequence of PU disease is highest in perforation. Therefore, early identification of patients with perforated PUs (PPUs) who are more likely to experience negative outcomes after surgery is crucial for making the right treatment decisions. Hence, this study uses the peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score to predict mortality within 30 days of surgery and risk stratifies patients undergoing surgical therapy for PPUs. Materials and Methods: The patients presenting to a tertiary care setting with symptoms of hollow viscous perforation and intraoperative evidence suggestive of PPU were included in this prospective study between November 2016 and October 2020. After taking necessary ethical permissions from the institution, a total of 120 PPU patients were made part of this study. Results: In total, 120 patients were involved in the study including 94 men and 26 women. One hundred and ten patients were in the low-risk group, and 10 were in the high-risk group. In the postoperative period, eight patients from the high-risk group passed away, compared to two deaths in the low-risk group. Conclusion: The prognostic markers employed in the PULP score are simple to use and straightforward to be identified before surgery. The PULP score can help with the quick and accurate identification of high-risk patients, which can help with risk stratification and triaging of PPU patients.","PeriodicalId":8296,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of peptic ulcer perforation score: A predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation from a rural tertiary care setting\",\"authors\":\"LV Simhachalam Kutikuppala, TarakaKrishna Nulukurthi, Balaji Karnasula, RHemanth Kumar Chowdary, JyothiSwaroop Chintala\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/amhs.amhs_248_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: Peptic ulcers (PUs) result from the increased aggressive or decreased protective elements in the stomach or duodenum, which can gradually cause mucosal damage and ulceration. The risk of death as a consequence of PU disease is highest in perforation. Therefore, early identification of patients with perforated PUs (PPUs) who are more likely to experience negative outcomes after surgery is crucial for making the right treatment decisions. Hence, this study uses the peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score to predict mortality within 30 days of surgery and risk stratifies patients undergoing surgical therapy for PPUs. Materials and Methods: The patients presenting to a tertiary care setting with symptoms of hollow viscous perforation and intraoperative evidence suggestive of PPU were included in this prospective study between November 2016 and October 2020. After taking necessary ethical permissions from the institution, a total of 120 PPU patients were made part of this study. Results: In total, 120 patients were involved in the study including 94 men and 26 women. One hundred and ten patients were in the low-risk group, and 10 were in the high-risk group. In the postoperative period, eight patients from the high-risk group passed away, compared to two deaths in the low-risk group. Conclusion: The prognostic markers employed in the PULP score are simple to use and straightforward to be identified before surgery. The PULP score can help with the quick and accurate identification of high-risk patients, which can help with risk stratification and triaging of PPU patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/amhs.amhs_248_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/amhs.amhs_248_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:消化性溃疡(PUs)是由于胃或十二指肠中侵袭性成分增加或保护性成分减少而引起的,可逐渐引起粘膜损伤和溃疡。PU疾病导致死亡的风险在穿孔中最高。因此,早期识别脓腔穿孔(ppu)患者(更有可能在手术后经历负面结果)对于做出正确的治疗决策至关重要。因此,本研究使用消化性溃疡穿孔(PULP)评分来预测手术30天内的死亡率,并对接受ppu手术治疗的患者进行风险分层。材料和方法:2016年11月至2020年10月期间,本前瞻性研究纳入了在三级医疗机构就诊并出现空心粘性穿孔症状和术中证据提示PPU的患者。在获得机构必要的伦理许可后,共有120名PPU患者成为本研究的一部分。结果:共纳入120例患者,其中男性94例,女性26例。110名患者属于低危组,10名患者属于高危组。在术后期间,高危组有8例患者死亡,而低危组有2例死亡。结论:PULP评分的预后指标使用简单,术前可直接确定。PULP评分有助于快速准确地识别高危患者,有助于PPU患者的风险分层和分诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An assessment of peptic ulcer perforation score: A predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation from a rural tertiary care setting
Background and Aim: Peptic ulcers (PUs) result from the increased aggressive or decreased protective elements in the stomach or duodenum, which can gradually cause mucosal damage and ulceration. The risk of death as a consequence of PU disease is highest in perforation. Therefore, early identification of patients with perforated PUs (PPUs) who are more likely to experience negative outcomes after surgery is crucial for making the right treatment decisions. Hence, this study uses the peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score to predict mortality within 30 days of surgery and risk stratifies patients undergoing surgical therapy for PPUs. Materials and Methods: The patients presenting to a tertiary care setting with symptoms of hollow viscous perforation and intraoperative evidence suggestive of PPU were included in this prospective study between November 2016 and October 2020. After taking necessary ethical permissions from the institution, a total of 120 PPU patients were made part of this study. Results: In total, 120 patients were involved in the study including 94 men and 26 women. One hundred and ten patients were in the low-risk group, and 10 were in the high-risk group. In the postoperative period, eight patients from the high-risk group passed away, compared to two deaths in the low-risk group. Conclusion: The prognostic markers employed in the PULP score are simple to use and straightforward to be identified before surgery. The PULP score can help with the quick and accurate identification of high-risk patients, which can help with risk stratification and triaging of PPU patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Blood Donor Selection Profile an Important Tool for Blood Safety: An Institutional Experience Choosing the Right Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Gender –Specific Approach A Rare Case of Dentigerous Cyst in a 1-day-old Neonate Carotid Cavernous Fistula – Radiological Features A Retrospective Study on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Adolescent Pregnancies at a Referral Hospital in Bengaluru
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1