P. Pan, Sheng-Bing Zhao, Rundong Wang, Shuling Wang, Hong-Bo Sun, T. Xia, Xin Chang, Lun Gu, Zhao-shen Li, Yu Bai
{"title":"低残留饮食用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的评价","authors":"P. Pan, Sheng-Bing Zhao, Rundong Wang, Shuling Wang, Hong-Bo Sun, T. Xia, Xin Chang, Lun Gu, Zhao-shen Li, Yu Bai","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the clinical value of a commercial low-residue diet (LRD) for bowel preparation of colonoscopy. \n \n \nMethods \nThis study was a prospective, endoscopist-blind, and randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups according to administration of LRD: the experimental group and the control group. Bowel preparation quality, compliance and tolerability of the two groups were compared. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 61 patients were enrolled, with 32 in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. The outcomes were as follows: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) (7.8±1.0 VS 7.1±1.3, P=0.037), the rate of bowel preparation adequacy (87.5% VS 79.3%, P=0.388), compliance rate of dietary restriction (78.1% VS 55.2%, P=0.057), preparation completion rate (93.8% VS 93.1%, P=0.919), cecal intubation rate (both were 100.0%) and cecum arrival time (9.1±2.9 min VS 9.8±3.7 min, P=0.417), incidence of adverse (3.1% VS 3.4%, P=0.944), and hunger rate before colonoscopy (34.4% VS 48.3%, P=0.102). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe LRD for bowel preparation of colonoscopy significantly improves BBPS, but its effect on improving the bowel preparation adequacy, patient compliance and tolerability needs to be confirmed by further larger-scale trials. \n \n \nKey words: \nColonoscopy; Enteral nutrition; Food, formulated; Recommended dietary allowances; Bowel preparation","PeriodicalId":10072,"journal":{"name":"中华消化内镜杂志","volume":"36 1","pages":"923-927"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a low-residue diet for bowel preparation of colonoscopy\",\"authors\":\"P. Pan, Sheng-Bing Zhao, Rundong Wang, Shuling Wang, Hong-Bo Sun, T. Xia, Xin Chang, Lun Gu, Zhao-shen Li, Yu Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.12.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the clinical value of a commercial low-residue diet (LRD) for bowel preparation of colonoscopy. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThis study was a prospective, endoscopist-blind, and randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups according to administration of LRD: the experimental group and the control group. Bowel preparation quality, compliance and tolerability of the two groups were compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nA total of 61 patients were enrolled, with 32 in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. The outcomes were as follows: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) (7.8±1.0 VS 7.1±1.3, P=0.037), the rate of bowel preparation adequacy (87.5% VS 79.3%, P=0.388), compliance rate of dietary restriction (78.1% VS 55.2%, P=0.057), preparation completion rate (93.8% VS 93.1%, P=0.919), cecal intubation rate (both were 100.0%) and cecum arrival time (9.1±2.9 min VS 9.8±3.7 min, P=0.417), incidence of adverse (3.1% VS 3.4%, P=0.944), and hunger rate before colonoscopy (34.4% VS 48.3%, P=0.102). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nThe LRD for bowel preparation of colonoscopy significantly improves BBPS, but its effect on improving the bowel preparation adequacy, patient compliance and tolerability needs to be confirmed by further larger-scale trials. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nColonoscopy; Enteral nutrition; Food, formulated; Recommended dietary allowances; Bowel preparation\",\"PeriodicalId\":10072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华消化内镜杂志\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"923-927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华消化内镜杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.12.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化内镜杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.12.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨低残粮在结肠镜术前肠准备中的应用价值。方法本研究为前瞻性、内镜盲、随机对照试验。根据LRD的给药情况,将参与者随机分为实验组和对照组。比较两组患者的肠道准备质量、依从性和耐受性。结果共纳入61例患者,实验组32例,对照组29例。结果如下:波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)(7.8±1.0 VS 7.1±1.3,P=0.037)、肠准备充分率(87.5% VS 79.3%, P=0.388)、饮食限制依从率(78.1% VS 55.2%, P=0.057)、准备完成率(93.8% VS 93.1%, P=0.919)、盲肠插管率(均为100.0%)和盲肠到达时间(9.1±2.9 min VS 9.8±3.7 min, P=0.417)、不良反应发生率(3.1% VS 3.4%, P=0.944)、结肠镜检查前饥饿率(34.4% VS 48.3%, P=0.102)。结论LRD用于结肠镜下肠准备可显著改善BBPS,但其在改善肠准备充分性、患者依从性和耐受性方面的作用有待进一步大规模试验证实。关键词:结肠镜检查;肠内营养;的食物,制定;建议膳食摄入量;肠道准备
Evaluation of a low-residue diet for bowel preparation of colonoscopy
Objective
To evaluate the clinical value of a commercial low-residue diet (LRD) for bowel preparation of colonoscopy.
Methods
This study was a prospective, endoscopist-blind, and randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups according to administration of LRD: the experimental group and the control group. Bowel preparation quality, compliance and tolerability of the two groups were compared.
Results
A total of 61 patients were enrolled, with 32 in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. The outcomes were as follows: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) (7.8±1.0 VS 7.1±1.3, P=0.037), the rate of bowel preparation adequacy (87.5% VS 79.3%, P=0.388), compliance rate of dietary restriction (78.1% VS 55.2%, P=0.057), preparation completion rate (93.8% VS 93.1%, P=0.919), cecal intubation rate (both were 100.0%) and cecum arrival time (9.1±2.9 min VS 9.8±3.7 min, P=0.417), incidence of adverse (3.1% VS 3.4%, P=0.944), and hunger rate before colonoscopy (34.4% VS 48.3%, P=0.102).
Conclusion
The LRD for bowel preparation of colonoscopy significantly improves BBPS, but its effect on improving the bowel preparation adequacy, patient compliance and tolerability needs to be confirmed by further larger-scale trials.
Key words:
Colonoscopy; Enteral nutrition; Food, formulated; Recommended dietary allowances; Bowel preparation
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy is a high-level medical academic journal specializing in digestive endoscopy, which was renamed Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy in August 1996 from Endoscopy.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy mainly reports the leading scientific research results of esophagoscopy, gastroscopy, duodenoscopy, choledochoscopy, laparoscopy, colorectoscopy, small enteroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, etc. and the progress of their equipments and technologies at home and abroad, as well as the clinical diagnosis and treatment experience.
The main columns are: treatises, abstracts of treatises, clinical reports, technical exchanges, special case reports and endoscopic complications.
The target readers are digestive system diseases and digestive endoscopy workers who are engaged in medical treatment, teaching and scientific research.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy has been indexed by ISTIC, PKU, CSAD, WPRIM.