{"title":"演讲","authors":"D. Coitinho","doi":"10.4013/fsu.2020.213.ap","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are pleased to present to the Brazilian and international philosophical community the third number of the twenty-one volume (2020 - September-December) of Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, which consists of eight articles and one book review. The excellent articles published in this number deal with varied topics, such as the moral dimension of torture, the indispensability of i-desires, the belief and pluralistic ignorance, the influence of Hume’s theory of passions on Smith’s moral theory, the priority of injustice, the strength of the ethics of alterity, an objection to Chalmers’s conceivability argument and an objection against Searle’s ontological subjectivity of consciousness thesis. It also has an important review that analyzes tyranny in Plato’s Republic.","PeriodicalId":41989,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Unisinos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presentation\",\"authors\":\"D. Coitinho\",\"doi\":\"10.4013/fsu.2020.213.ap\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are pleased to present to the Brazilian and international philosophical community the third number of the twenty-one volume (2020 - September-December) of Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, which consists of eight articles and one book review. The excellent articles published in this number deal with varied topics, such as the moral dimension of torture, the indispensability of i-desires, the belief and pluralistic ignorance, the influence of Hume’s theory of passions on Smith’s moral theory, the priority of injustice, the strength of the ethics of alterity, an objection to Chalmers’s conceivability argument and an objection against Searle’s ontological subjectivity of consciousness thesis. It also has an important review that analyzes tyranny in Plato’s Republic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofia Unisinos\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofia Unisinos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2020.213.ap\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Unisinos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2020.213.ap","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们很高兴向巴西和国际哲学界介绍《Unisinos Journal of Philosophy》21卷(2020年9月至12月)的第三期,其中包括八篇文章和一篇书评。本刊发表的优秀文章涉及各种主题,如酷刑的道德维度、自我欲望的不可或缺性、信仰和多元无知、休谟的激情理论对史密斯道德理论的影响、不公正的优先性、另类伦理的力量、对查尔默斯的可想象性论点的反对以及对塞尔的意识本体论主体性论点的反对。它也有一个重要的评论,分析柏拉图的《理想国》中的暴政。
We are pleased to present to the Brazilian and international philosophical community the third number of the twenty-one volume (2020 - September-December) of Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, which consists of eight articles and one book review. The excellent articles published in this number deal with varied topics, such as the moral dimension of torture, the indispensability of i-desires, the belief and pluralistic ignorance, the influence of Hume’s theory of passions on Smith’s moral theory, the priority of injustice, the strength of the ethics of alterity, an objection to Chalmers’s conceivability argument and an objection against Searle’s ontological subjectivity of consciousness thesis. It also has an important review that analyzes tyranny in Plato’s Republic.