爵士乐中的和声与节奏对立——以约翰·科尔特兰及其经典四重奏为例

Q3 Arts and Humanities Jazz Perspectives Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17494060.2020.1734052
Brian A. Levy
{"title":"爵士乐中的和声与节奏对立——以约翰·科尔特兰及其经典四重奏为例","authors":"Brian A. Levy","doi":"10.1080/17494060.2020.1734052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The body of work produced by John Coltrane's Classic Quartet is notable for its rhetorical language of tension and release among the band members and Coltrane's transcendent playing, seemingly free of the underlying substructure. This paper examines selected historic recordings, culminating with an analysis of two paradigmatic recordings by John Coltrane's Classic Quartet: “Miles’ Mode” (Coltrane, 1962) and “Pursuance” (A Love Supreme, 1964). The paper argues that there are four important ways that Coltrane's Quartet creates tensions that distinguish it from the way tensions were created by its predecessors, resulting in longer, more complex, and more abstract oppositions. To contextualize those oppositions of Coltrane's Quartet, the paper cites historical examples that challenge an underlying harmonic or metrical substructure. Coltrane's quartet uses enhanced techniques of harmonic and temporal displacements that reveal how multiple players can create the effect of freedom experienced by listeners.","PeriodicalId":39826,"journal":{"name":"Jazz Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17494060.2020.1734052","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harmonic and Rhythmic Oppositions in Jazz: The Special Case of John Coltrane and His Classic Quartet\",\"authors\":\"Brian A. Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17494060.2020.1734052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The body of work produced by John Coltrane's Classic Quartet is notable for its rhetorical language of tension and release among the band members and Coltrane's transcendent playing, seemingly free of the underlying substructure. This paper examines selected historic recordings, culminating with an analysis of two paradigmatic recordings by John Coltrane's Classic Quartet: “Miles’ Mode” (Coltrane, 1962) and “Pursuance” (A Love Supreme, 1964). The paper argues that there are four important ways that Coltrane's Quartet creates tensions that distinguish it from the way tensions were created by its predecessors, resulting in longer, more complex, and more abstract oppositions. To contextualize those oppositions of Coltrane's Quartet, the paper cites historical examples that challenge an underlying harmonic or metrical substructure. Coltrane's quartet uses enhanced techniques of harmonic and temporal displacements that reveal how multiple players can create the effect of freedom experienced by listeners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jazz Perspectives\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17494060.2020.1734052\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jazz Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17494060.2020.1734052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jazz Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17494060.2020.1734052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:约翰·科尔特兰的经典四重奏作品以其在乐队成员之间的紧张和释放的修辞语言以及科尔特兰超凡脱俗的演奏而闻名,似乎没有底层结构。本文考察了精选的历史录音,最后分析了约翰·科尔特兰的经典四重奏的两张典型录音:《迈尔斯模式》(Coltrane,1962)和《追求》(A Love Supreme,1964)。该论文认为,科尔特兰的四重奏以四种重要方式制造紧张局势,这四种方式将其与前任制造紧张局势的方式区分开来,导致更长、更复杂、更抽象的对立。为了将科尔特兰四重奏的这些对立置于背景中,本文引用了挑战潜在和声或韵律亚结构的历史例子。Coltrane的四重奏使用了和声和时间位移的增强技术,揭示了多个演奏者如何创造听众体验到的自由效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harmonic and Rhythmic Oppositions in Jazz: The Special Case of John Coltrane and His Classic Quartet
ABSTRACT The body of work produced by John Coltrane's Classic Quartet is notable for its rhetorical language of tension and release among the band members and Coltrane's transcendent playing, seemingly free of the underlying substructure. This paper examines selected historic recordings, culminating with an analysis of two paradigmatic recordings by John Coltrane's Classic Quartet: “Miles’ Mode” (Coltrane, 1962) and “Pursuance” (A Love Supreme, 1964). The paper argues that there are four important ways that Coltrane's Quartet creates tensions that distinguish it from the way tensions were created by its predecessors, resulting in longer, more complex, and more abstract oppositions. To contextualize those oppositions of Coltrane's Quartet, the paper cites historical examples that challenge an underlying harmonic or metrical substructure. Coltrane's quartet uses enhanced techniques of harmonic and temporal displacements that reveal how multiple players can create the effect of freedom experienced by listeners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jazz Perspectives
Jazz Perspectives Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Shitposting of Jazz to Come: Virtual Communities, Internetworks, and the Dank Jazz Meme Free Improvisation, Egalitarianism, and Knowledge Fusion – Locating Artistic Hybridity in Miles Davis’ “Spanish Key” The Gathering Ground: Composing Collaboration in Nyilipidgi, a Dynamic Meeting of manikay and jazz Uncovering the Origin Story of Juan Tizol’s Caravan: A Predecessor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1