{"title":"中年人周末补觉和睡眠时间与死亡率关系的前瞻性研究","authors":"Takuya Yoshiike, Aoi Kawamura, Tomohiro Utsumi, Kentaro Matsui, Kenichi Kuriyama","doi":"10.1007/s41105-023-00460-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health effects of weekend catch-up sleep (CUS) could differ depending on both the ability to obtain sufficient sleep during weekdays and amount of weekend CUS required to compensate for sleep lost during the week. Using data from 3128 middle-aged (40-64 years) participants of the Sleep Heart Health Study, we examined the longitudinal association of these two aspects of sleep with all-cause mortality. CUS was calculated as the difference in self-reported habitual sleep duration between weekends and weekdays, and classified into no, short (1 h), and long (2 h or more) CUS. Polysomnography-measured total sleep time, representing the ability to obtain sufficient sleep, was classified into short (< 360 min) or normal (≥ 360 min) sleep durations. We estimated multivariable-adjusted mortality hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for six groups divided by the extent of CUS and sleep duration. Participants were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 12.3 (11.3-13.5) years. Short weekend CUS with normal sleep duration was associated with lower mortality compared to no CUS with normal sleep duration (HR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.27-0.83). When stricter cutoffs were applied for sleep durations, while the protective effect of short CUS with normal sleep duration (≥ 390 min) was strengthened (HR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.17-0.78), the harmful effect of short CUS with short sleep duration (< 330 min) emerged (HR, 1.84; 95% CI 1.08-3.14). Results highlight the importance of balancing sleep ability and CUS. Sufficient sleep may reduce weekday sleep debt and only a short CUS would be required on weekends, improving mortality in middle-aged adults.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41105-023-00460-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":21896,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Biological Rhythms","volume":"21 1","pages":"409-418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective study of the association of weekend catch-up sleep and sleep duration with mortality in middle-aged adults.\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Yoshiike, Aoi Kawamura, Tomohiro Utsumi, Kentaro Matsui, Kenichi Kuriyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41105-023-00460-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health effects of weekend catch-up sleep (CUS) could differ depending on both the ability to obtain sufficient sleep during weekdays and amount of weekend CUS required to compensate for sleep lost during the week. Using data from 3128 middle-aged (40-64 years) participants of the Sleep Heart Health Study, we examined the longitudinal association of these two aspects of sleep with all-cause mortality. CUS was calculated as the difference in self-reported habitual sleep duration between weekends and weekdays, and classified into no, short (1 h), and long (2 h or more) CUS. Polysomnography-measured total sleep time, representing the ability to obtain sufficient sleep, was classified into short (< 360 min) or normal (≥ 360 min) sleep durations. We estimated multivariable-adjusted mortality hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for six groups divided by the extent of CUS and sleep duration. Participants were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 12.3 (11.3-13.5) years. Short weekend CUS with normal sleep duration was associated with lower mortality compared to no CUS with normal sleep duration (HR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.27-0.83). When stricter cutoffs were applied for sleep durations, while the protective effect of short CUS with normal sleep duration (≥ 390 min) was strengthened (HR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.17-0.78), the harmful effect of short CUS with short sleep duration (< 330 min) emerged (HR, 1.84; 95% CI 1.08-3.14). Results highlight the importance of balancing sleep ability and CUS. Sufficient sleep may reduce weekday sleep debt and only a short CUS would be required on weekends, improving mortality in middle-aged adults.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41105-023-00460-6.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep and Biological Rhythms\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"409-418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900010/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep and Biological Rhythms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-023-00460-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Biological Rhythms","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-023-00460-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
周末补觉(CUS)对健康的影响可能因平日获得充足睡眠的能力和周末补觉的量而异。我们利用睡眠心脏健康研究(Sleep Heart Health Study)3128 名中年(40-64 岁)参与者的数据,研究了睡眠的这两个方面与全因死亡率的纵向关系。CUS的计算方法是自我报告的习惯性睡眠时间在周末和工作日之间的差异,分为无CUS、短CUS(1小时)和长CUS(2小时或以上)。多导睡眠监测仪测得的总睡眠时间代表获得充足睡眠的能力,分为短睡眠时间(补充资料:在线版本包含补充材料,可在 10.1007/s41105-023-00460-6 上查阅。
A prospective study of the association of weekend catch-up sleep and sleep duration with mortality in middle-aged adults.
Health effects of weekend catch-up sleep (CUS) could differ depending on both the ability to obtain sufficient sleep during weekdays and amount of weekend CUS required to compensate for sleep lost during the week. Using data from 3128 middle-aged (40-64 years) participants of the Sleep Heart Health Study, we examined the longitudinal association of these two aspects of sleep with all-cause mortality. CUS was calculated as the difference in self-reported habitual sleep duration between weekends and weekdays, and classified into no, short (1 h), and long (2 h or more) CUS. Polysomnography-measured total sleep time, representing the ability to obtain sufficient sleep, was classified into short (< 360 min) or normal (≥ 360 min) sleep durations. We estimated multivariable-adjusted mortality hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for six groups divided by the extent of CUS and sleep duration. Participants were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 12.3 (11.3-13.5) years. Short weekend CUS with normal sleep duration was associated with lower mortality compared to no CUS with normal sleep duration (HR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.27-0.83). When stricter cutoffs were applied for sleep durations, while the protective effect of short CUS with normal sleep duration (≥ 390 min) was strengthened (HR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.17-0.78), the harmful effect of short CUS with short sleep duration (< 330 min) emerged (HR, 1.84; 95% CI 1.08-3.14). Results highlight the importance of balancing sleep ability and CUS. Sufficient sleep may reduce weekday sleep debt and only a short CUS would be required on weekends, improving mortality in middle-aged adults.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41105-023-00460-6.
期刊介绍:
Sleep and Biological Rhythms is a quarterly peer-reviewed publication dealing with medical treatments relating to sleep. The journal publishies original articles, short papers, commentaries and the occasional reviews. In scope the journal covers mechanisms of sleep and wakefullness from the ranging perspectives of basic science, medicine, dentistry, pharmacology, psychology, engineering, public health and related branches of the social sciences