寻找共同利益的共同点:呼吁信仰和非信仰组织之间的创新合作

Danielle I. Ellis, T. Fitzgerald
{"title":"寻找共同利益的共同点:呼吁信仰和非信仰组织之间的创新合作","authors":"Danielle I. Ellis, T. Fitzgerald","doi":"10.15566/cjgh.v9i1.585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both faith-based organizations (FBOs) and non-faith-based organizations (NFBOs) make significant contributions to healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, particularly for patients with fewer economic resources.  The perception that FBO and NFBO are dissimilar may contribute to there being insufficient interactions between them.  But in fact, faith and humanitarianism are intimately and historically connected.  As a byproduct, FBO and NFBO share both accomplishments and criticisms, including echoes of imperialism and lack of neutrality.  A mutual interest approach could cultivate partnerships between FBO and NFBO, allowing them to pursue the common good of a healthier world without risking assimilation, isolation, or inauthenticity.","PeriodicalId":52275,"journal":{"name":"Christian Journal for Global Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding Common Ground for the Common Good: An Appeal for Innovative Collaboration between Faith- and Non-faith Based Organizations\",\"authors\":\"Danielle I. Ellis, T. Fitzgerald\",\"doi\":\"10.15566/cjgh.v9i1.585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Both faith-based organizations (FBOs) and non-faith-based organizations (NFBOs) make significant contributions to healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, particularly for patients with fewer economic resources.  The perception that FBO and NFBO are dissimilar may contribute to there being insufficient interactions between them.  But in fact, faith and humanitarianism are intimately and historically connected.  As a byproduct, FBO and NFBO share both accomplishments and criticisms, including echoes of imperialism and lack of neutrality.  A mutual interest approach could cultivate partnerships between FBO and NFBO, allowing them to pursue the common good of a healthier world without risking assimilation, isolation, or inauthenticity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian Journal for Global Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian Journal for Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v9i1.585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Journal for Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v9i1.585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于信仰的组织(fbo)和非基于信仰的组织(nfbo)都对低收入和中等收入国家的医疗保健做出了重大贡献,特别是对经济资源较少的患者。认为FBO和NFBO不同的看法可能会导致它们之间的互动不足。但事实上,信仰和人道主义在历史上有着密切的联系。作为副产品,FBO和NFBO既有成就,也有批评,包括帝国主义的回声和缺乏中立性。共同利益方针可以培养FBO和NFBO之间的伙伴关系,使它们能够追求更健康世界的共同利益,而不会冒被同化、孤立或不真实的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finding Common Ground for the Common Good: An Appeal for Innovative Collaboration between Faith- and Non-faith Based Organizations
Both faith-based organizations (FBOs) and non-faith-based organizations (NFBOs) make significant contributions to healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, particularly for patients with fewer economic resources.  The perception that FBO and NFBO are dissimilar may contribute to there being insufficient interactions between them.  But in fact, faith and humanitarianism are intimately and historically connected.  As a byproduct, FBO and NFBO share both accomplishments and criticisms, including echoes of imperialism and lack of neutrality.  A mutual interest approach could cultivate partnerships between FBO and NFBO, allowing them to pursue the common good of a healthier world without risking assimilation, isolation, or inauthenticity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Christian Journal for Global Health
Christian Journal for Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Difference in Clinical Knowledge Between Staff Employed at Faith-based and Public Facilities in Malawi Faith-based Healthcare in Africa: Stylized Facts from Data Collected by the Catholic Church Effective Localization: Case Study of a Faith-based Health Partnership in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe Faith Based Healthcare in Africa Health Status Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Risk Perceptions in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1