特拉特洛尔科大屠杀与美国和英国政府

Lukáš Perutka, Luz Araceli González Uresti
{"title":"特拉特洛尔科大屠杀与美国和英国政府","authors":"Lukáš Perutka, Luz Araceli González Uresti","doi":"10.14712/24647063.2022.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented article analyzes the international dimension of the so-called Tlatelolco massacre of 1968. It focuses on the diplomatic reaction of two of Mexico’s neighbors, the United States of America and the United Kingdom that still held its colony of British Honduras. This topic has been neglected by historiography so far. It is based on the archival resources from British National Archives in Kew and online declassified American documents available thanks to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The reaction of both governments was minimal and relatively calm because they understood the massacre did not endanger their strong ally Gustavo Díaz Ordaz and the students’ protests were not anti-American nor anti-British. Similarly, there was a vague connection to the international communist movement, and no countries from the communist camp were directly involved. The only difference we could find was in the evaluation of the massacre. The British saw it as an opportunity for further democratization of Mexico, i.e., they took a more normative stance. The Americans approached the situation more pragmatically. They were supportive of the undemocratic regime as long as it took an anti-communist stance.","PeriodicalId":53013,"journal":{"name":"IberoAmericana Pragensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La masacre de Tlatelolco y los gobiernos de los Estados Unidos de América y de Gran Bretaña\",\"authors\":\"Lukáš Perutka, Luz Araceli González Uresti\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/24647063.2022.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The presented article analyzes the international dimension of the so-called Tlatelolco massacre of 1968. It focuses on the diplomatic reaction of two of Mexico’s neighbors, the United States of America and the United Kingdom that still held its colony of British Honduras. This topic has been neglected by historiography so far. It is based on the archival resources from British National Archives in Kew and online declassified American documents available thanks to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The reaction of both governments was minimal and relatively calm because they understood the massacre did not endanger their strong ally Gustavo Díaz Ordaz and the students’ protests were not anti-American nor anti-British. Similarly, there was a vague connection to the international communist movement, and no countries from the communist camp were directly involved. The only difference we could find was in the evaluation of the massacre. The British saw it as an opportunity for further democratization of Mexico, i.e., they took a more normative stance. The Americans approached the situation more pragmatically. They were supportive of the undemocratic regime as long as it took an anti-communist stance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IberoAmericana Pragensia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IberoAmericana Pragensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/24647063.2022.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IberoAmericana Pragensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24647063.2022.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了1968年所谓的特拉特洛尔科大屠杀的国际层面。它的重点是墨西哥的两个邻国,美利坚合众国和英国的外交反应,这两个国家仍然持有其殖民地英属洪都拉斯。到目前为止,这个话题一直被史学所忽视。它是基于英国国家档案馆的档案资源和在线解密的美国文件,感谢信息自由法案(FOIA)。两国政府的反应都很小,而且相对平静,因为他们知道大屠杀不会危及他们强大的盟友Gustavo Díaz Ordaz,而且学生的抗议既不是反美也不是反英。同样,它与国际共产主义运动有模糊的联系,没有共产主义阵营的国家直接参与其中。我们能发现的唯一不同是对大屠杀的评估。英国人认为这是墨西哥进一步民主化的机会,也就是说,他们采取了更规范的立场。美国人更务实地处理这一局势。他们支持这个不民主的政权,只要它采取反共立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La masacre de Tlatelolco y los gobiernos de los Estados Unidos de América y de Gran Bretaña
The presented article analyzes the international dimension of the so-called Tlatelolco massacre of 1968. It focuses on the diplomatic reaction of two of Mexico’s neighbors, the United States of America and the United Kingdom that still held its colony of British Honduras. This topic has been neglected by historiography so far. It is based on the archival resources from British National Archives in Kew and online declassified American documents available thanks to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The reaction of both governments was minimal and relatively calm because they understood the massacre did not endanger their strong ally Gustavo Díaz Ordaz and the students’ protests were not anti-American nor anti-British. Similarly, there was a vague connection to the international communist movement, and no countries from the communist camp were directly involved. The only difference we could find was in the evaluation of the massacre. The British saw it as an opportunity for further democratization of Mexico, i.e., they took a more normative stance. The Americans approached the situation more pragmatically. They were supportive of the undemocratic regime as long as it took an anti-communist stance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Consuelo Naranjo Orovio, Cartas con historia. Pedro Henríquez Ureña entre América y España Alice Flemrová y Šárka Grauová, Zrcadla a masky Simposio checo-uruguayo: Nuestro siglo en común (Universidad de Hradec Králové, 25 de noviembre de 2021) Nota editorial Zdeněk Kalkus, Kuba, Skrytá perla Karibiku
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1