{"title":"从条纹透镜看铜超导体","authors":"J. Tranquada","doi":"10.1080/00018732.2021.1935698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the electron pairing in hole-doped cuprate superconductors has been a challenge, in particular because the “normal” state from which it evolves is unprecedented. Now, after three and a half decades of research, involving a wide range of experimental characterizations, it is possible to delineate a clear and consistent cuprate story. It starts with doping holes into a charge-transfer insulator, resulting in in-gap states. These states exhibit a pseudogap resulting from the competition between antiferromagnetic superexchange J between nearest-neighbor Cu atoms (a real-space interaction) and the kinetic energy of the doped holes, which, in the absence of interactions, would lead to extended Bloch-wave states whose occupancy is characterized in reciprocal space. To develop some degree of coherence on cooling, the spin and charge correlations must self-organize in a cooperative fashion. A specific example of resulting emergent order is that of spin and charge stripes, as observed in La Ba CuO . While stripe order frustrates bulk superconductivity, it nevertheless develops pairing and superconducting order of an unusual character. The antiphase order of the spin stripes decouples them from the charge stripes, which can be viewed as hole-doped, two-leg, spin- ladders. Established theory tells us that the pairing scale is comparable to the singlet-triplet excitation energy, , on the ladders. To achieve superconducting order, the pair correlations in neighboring ladders must develop phase order. In the presence of spin stripe order, antiphase Josephson coupling can lead to pair-density-wave superconductivity. Alternatively, in-phase superconductivity requires that the spin stripes have an energy gap, which empirically limits the coherent superconducting gap. Hence, superconducting order in the cuprates involves a compromise between the pairing scale, which is maximized at , and phase coherence, which is optimized at . To understand further experimental details, it is necessary to take account of the local variation in hole density resulting from dopant disorder and poor screening of long-range Coulomb interactions. At large hole doping, kinetic energy wins out over J, the regions of intertwined spin and charge correlations become sparse, and the superconductivity disappears. While there are a few experimental mysteries that remain to be resolved, I believe that this story captures the essence of the cuprates.","PeriodicalId":7373,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physics","volume":"69 1","pages":"437 - 509"},"PeriodicalIF":35.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00018732.2021.1935698","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cuprate superconductors as viewed through a striped lens\",\"authors\":\"J. Tranquada\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00018732.2021.1935698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the electron pairing in hole-doped cuprate superconductors has been a challenge, in particular because the “normal” state from which it evolves is unprecedented. Now, after three and a half decades of research, involving a wide range of experimental characterizations, it is possible to delineate a clear and consistent cuprate story. It starts with doping holes into a charge-transfer insulator, resulting in in-gap states. These states exhibit a pseudogap resulting from the competition between antiferromagnetic superexchange J between nearest-neighbor Cu atoms (a real-space interaction) and the kinetic energy of the doped holes, which, in the absence of interactions, would lead to extended Bloch-wave states whose occupancy is characterized in reciprocal space. To develop some degree of coherence on cooling, the spin and charge correlations must self-organize in a cooperative fashion. A specific example of resulting emergent order is that of spin and charge stripes, as observed in La Ba CuO . While stripe order frustrates bulk superconductivity, it nevertheless develops pairing and superconducting order of an unusual character. The antiphase order of the spin stripes decouples them from the charge stripes, which can be viewed as hole-doped, two-leg, spin- ladders. Established theory tells us that the pairing scale is comparable to the singlet-triplet excitation energy, , on the ladders. To achieve superconducting order, the pair correlations in neighboring ladders must develop phase order. In the presence of spin stripe order, antiphase Josephson coupling can lead to pair-density-wave superconductivity. Alternatively, in-phase superconductivity requires that the spin stripes have an energy gap, which empirically limits the coherent superconducting gap. Hence, superconducting order in the cuprates involves a compromise between the pairing scale, which is maximized at , and phase coherence, which is optimized at . To understand further experimental details, it is necessary to take account of the local variation in hole density resulting from dopant disorder and poor screening of long-range Coulomb interactions. At large hole doping, kinetic energy wins out over J, the regions of intertwined spin and charge correlations become sparse, and the superconductivity disappears. While there are a few experimental mysteries that remain to be resolved, I believe that this story captures the essence of the cuprates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physics\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"437 - 509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":35.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00018732.2021.1935698\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2021.1935698\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2021.1935698","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47
摘要
理解空穴掺杂的铜酸盐超导体中的电子配对一直是一个挑战,特别是因为它进化的“正常”状态是前所未有的。现在,经过三十年半的研究,包括广泛的实验表征,有可能描绘出一个清晰一致的铜酸盐故事。它首先将空穴掺杂到电荷转移绝缘体中,从而产生间隙状态。这些态表现出由最近邻Cu原子之间的反铁磁超交换J(真实空间相互作用)和掺杂空穴的动能之间的竞争所产生的伪间隙,在没有相互作用的情况下,这将导致扩展的布洛赫波态,其占据特征在倒易空间中。为了在冷却过程中形成一定程度的相干性,自旋和电荷相关性必须以协作的方式自组织。由此产生的出射秩序的一个具体例子是在La Ba CuO中观察到的自旋和电荷条纹。虽然条带有序性阻碍了体超导性,但它仍然发展出一种不同寻常的配对和超导有序性。自旋条纹的反相顺序使它们与电荷条纹解耦,电荷条纹可以被视为空穴掺杂的双腿自旋梯。已有的理论告诉我们,在阶梯上,配对尺度与单重激发能相当。为了实现超导有序,相邻阶梯中的对相关性必须发展为相序。在存在自旋条纹序的情况下,反相位约瑟夫逊耦合可以导致对密度波超导性。或者,同相超导性要求自旋条纹具有能隙,这在经验上限制了相干超导间隙。因此,铜酸盐中的超导顺序涉及在配对尺度和相位相干性之间的折衷,配对尺度在时最大化,相位相干性在时优化。为了进一步了解实验细节,有必要考虑由掺杂无序和长程库仑相互作用的不良屏蔽引起的空穴密度的局部变化。在大空穴掺杂时,动能战胜J,自旋和电荷相互交织的区域变得稀疏,超导性消失。虽然还有一些实验谜团有待解决,但我相信这个故事抓住了铜酸盐的本质。
Cuprate superconductors as viewed through a striped lens
Understanding the electron pairing in hole-doped cuprate superconductors has been a challenge, in particular because the “normal” state from which it evolves is unprecedented. Now, after three and a half decades of research, involving a wide range of experimental characterizations, it is possible to delineate a clear and consistent cuprate story. It starts with doping holes into a charge-transfer insulator, resulting in in-gap states. These states exhibit a pseudogap resulting from the competition between antiferromagnetic superexchange J between nearest-neighbor Cu atoms (a real-space interaction) and the kinetic energy of the doped holes, which, in the absence of interactions, would lead to extended Bloch-wave states whose occupancy is characterized in reciprocal space. To develop some degree of coherence on cooling, the spin and charge correlations must self-organize in a cooperative fashion. A specific example of resulting emergent order is that of spin and charge stripes, as observed in La Ba CuO . While stripe order frustrates bulk superconductivity, it nevertheless develops pairing and superconducting order of an unusual character. The antiphase order of the spin stripes decouples them from the charge stripes, which can be viewed as hole-doped, two-leg, spin- ladders. Established theory tells us that the pairing scale is comparable to the singlet-triplet excitation energy, , on the ladders. To achieve superconducting order, the pair correlations in neighboring ladders must develop phase order. In the presence of spin stripe order, antiphase Josephson coupling can lead to pair-density-wave superconductivity. Alternatively, in-phase superconductivity requires that the spin stripes have an energy gap, which empirically limits the coherent superconducting gap. Hence, superconducting order in the cuprates involves a compromise between the pairing scale, which is maximized at , and phase coherence, which is optimized at . To understand further experimental details, it is necessary to take account of the local variation in hole density resulting from dopant disorder and poor screening of long-range Coulomb interactions. At large hole doping, kinetic energy wins out over J, the regions of intertwined spin and charge correlations become sparse, and the superconductivity disappears. While there are a few experimental mysteries that remain to be resolved, I believe that this story captures the essence of the cuprates.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Physics publishes authoritative critical reviews by experts on topics of interest and importance to condensed matter physicists. It is intended for motivated readers with a basic knowledge of the journal’s field and aims to draw out the salient points of a reviewed subject from the perspective of the author. The journal''s scope includes condensed matter physics and statistical mechanics: broadly defined to include the overlap with quantum information, cold atoms, soft matter physics and biophysics. Readership: Physicists, materials scientists and physical chemists in universities, industry and research institutes.