挪威Leka蛇绿岩杂岩断裂带的磁成像

IF 0.8 4区 地球科学 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Norwegian Journal of Geology Pub Date : 2020-06-25 DOI:10.17850/njg100-1-1
A. Michels, C. Fichler, Z. Pastore, S. McEnroe
{"title":"挪威Leka蛇绿岩杂岩断裂带的磁成像","authors":"A. Michels, C. Fichler, Z. Pastore, S. McEnroe","doi":"10.17850/njg100-1-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Michels, A., Fichler, C., Pastore, Z. and McEnroe, S. 2020: Magnetic mapping of fault zones in the Leka Ophiolite Complex, Norway. Norwegian Journal of Geology 100, 202003. https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg100-1-1 © Copyright the authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The island of Leka and surrounding skerries expose a complete suite of ophiolitic rocks, which are heavily faulted. Large areas consist of ultramafic rocks, which are locally hydrated and form serpentinites. Faults are commonly fluid pathways and can be areas of increased serpentinization. Because magnetite is a common product of serpentinization such fault zones add to the local magnetic response of the rocks. Here, ground-magnetic data were used in combination with aeromagnetic data to develop models over the major faults across the island. A mapping workflow was developed which uses tilted slabs to represent different zones of magnetization. The magnetic properties of surface-rock samples provided the constraints for the magnetic modeling. Sensitivity tests on the model showed the detection of magnetic fault zones to be limited to depths shallower than one km. Magnetic modeling allowed for an estimation of the magnetization of several major faults. The magnetic zone of one of the largest faults, which forms the boundary between gabbro and ultramafic rocks, had an enhanced magnetization over a width of approximately 200 m. The model is supported by both ground and aeromagnetic data: the first helped in refining the magnetization distribution at shallower depth, the latter allowed for modeling of the deeper part of the fault, indicating the geometry of a listric fault. The total magnetizations of the modeled slabs are well above the background magnetization of the Leka Ophiolite Complex (LOC) determined by modeling and on magnetic property data on >500 samples. This shift towards higher values indicates that serpentinization in some of the fault zones contributes significantly to the magnetic anomalies of the LOC.","PeriodicalId":49741,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Journal of Geology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic mapping of fault zones in the Leka Ophiolite Complex, Norway\",\"authors\":\"A. Michels, C. Fichler, Z. Pastore, S. McEnroe\",\"doi\":\"10.17850/njg100-1-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Michels, A., Fichler, C., Pastore, Z. and McEnroe, S. 2020: Magnetic mapping of fault zones in the Leka Ophiolite Complex, Norway. Norwegian Journal of Geology 100, 202003. https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg100-1-1 © Copyright the authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The island of Leka and surrounding skerries expose a complete suite of ophiolitic rocks, which are heavily faulted. Large areas consist of ultramafic rocks, which are locally hydrated and form serpentinites. Faults are commonly fluid pathways and can be areas of increased serpentinization. Because magnetite is a common product of serpentinization such fault zones add to the local magnetic response of the rocks. Here, ground-magnetic data were used in combination with aeromagnetic data to develop models over the major faults across the island. A mapping workflow was developed which uses tilted slabs to represent different zones of magnetization. The magnetic properties of surface-rock samples provided the constraints for the magnetic modeling. Sensitivity tests on the model showed the detection of magnetic fault zones to be limited to depths shallower than one km. Magnetic modeling allowed for an estimation of the magnetization of several major faults. The magnetic zone of one of the largest faults, which forms the boundary between gabbro and ultramafic rocks, had an enhanced magnetization over a width of approximately 200 m. The model is supported by both ground and aeromagnetic data: the first helped in refining the magnetization distribution at shallower depth, the latter allowed for modeling of the deeper part of the fault, indicating the geometry of a listric fault. The total magnetizations of the modeled slabs are well above the background magnetization of the Leka Ophiolite Complex (LOC) determined by modeling and on magnetic property data on >500 samples. This shift towards higher values indicates that serpentinization in some of the fault zones contributes significantly to the magnetic anomalies of the LOC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norwegian Journal of Geology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norwegian Journal of Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17850/njg100-1-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norwegian Journal of Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17850/njg100-1-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Michels, A, Fichler, C, Pastore, Z.和McEnroe, S. 2020:挪威Leka蛇绿岩杂岩断裂带的磁成像。地质学报100,2002,2003。https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg100-1-1©版权归作者所有。本作品采用知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议。雷卡岛和周围的斯克里岛暴露出一整套蛇绿岩,这些岩石有严重的断层。大面积由超镁铁质岩石组成,这些岩石局部水化并形成蛇纹岩。断层通常是流体通道,可能是蛇纹石化增加的区域。由于磁铁矿是蛇纹石化的共同产物,这种断裂带增加了岩石的局部磁响应。在这里,地磁数据与航磁数据结合使用,建立了覆盖全岛主要断层的模型。开发了一种映射工作流程,使用倾斜的板来表示不同的磁化区域。地表岩石样品的磁性为磁性模拟提供了约束条件。对该模型进行的灵敏度测试表明,对磁断层带的探测仅限于浅于1公里的深度。磁模拟可以估计几个主要断层的磁化强度。形成辉长岩和超镁铁质岩石边界的最大断层之一的磁化带在大约200米的宽度上磁化增强。该模型得到了地面和航磁数据的支持:地面和航磁数据有助于细化浅层深度的磁化分布,航磁数据可以对断层较深部分进行建模,从而显示出盘状断层的几何形状。模拟板的总磁化强度远高于Leka蛇绿岩杂岩(LOC)的背景磁化强度,该背景磁化强度是由模拟和bbb500样品的磁性能数据确定的。这种向高值的转变表明,某些断裂带的蛇纹石化对LOC的磁异常有重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Magnetic mapping of fault zones in the Leka Ophiolite Complex, Norway
Michels, A., Fichler, C., Pastore, Z. and McEnroe, S. 2020: Magnetic mapping of fault zones in the Leka Ophiolite Complex, Norway. Norwegian Journal of Geology 100, 202003. https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg100-1-1 © Copyright the authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The island of Leka and surrounding skerries expose a complete suite of ophiolitic rocks, which are heavily faulted. Large areas consist of ultramafic rocks, which are locally hydrated and form serpentinites. Faults are commonly fluid pathways and can be areas of increased serpentinization. Because magnetite is a common product of serpentinization such fault zones add to the local magnetic response of the rocks. Here, ground-magnetic data were used in combination with aeromagnetic data to develop models over the major faults across the island. A mapping workflow was developed which uses tilted slabs to represent different zones of magnetization. The magnetic properties of surface-rock samples provided the constraints for the magnetic modeling. Sensitivity tests on the model showed the detection of magnetic fault zones to be limited to depths shallower than one km. Magnetic modeling allowed for an estimation of the magnetization of several major faults. The magnetic zone of one of the largest faults, which forms the boundary between gabbro and ultramafic rocks, had an enhanced magnetization over a width of approximately 200 m. The model is supported by both ground and aeromagnetic data: the first helped in refining the magnetization distribution at shallower depth, the latter allowed for modeling of the deeper part of the fault, indicating the geometry of a listric fault. The total magnetizations of the modeled slabs are well above the background magnetization of the Leka Ophiolite Complex (LOC) determined by modeling and on magnetic property data on >500 samples. This shift towards higher values indicates that serpentinization in some of the fault zones contributes significantly to the magnetic anomalies of the LOC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Norwegian Journal of Geology
Norwegian Journal of Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Norwegian Journal of Geology publishes high-quality, fully peer-review papers from all geoscientific disciplines. Papers are commonly based on regional studies and should emphasise the development of understanding of fundamental geological processes. More specialised papers can also be submitted, but should be written in a way that is easily understood by nonspecialists, and illustrate the progress being made within that specific topic in geosciences. We also encourage initiatives for thematic issues within the scope of the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Configuration of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet in southwestern Norway during the Younger Dryas Magmatism during late Ordovician-early Silurian accretion of the Caledonides of Arctic Scandinavia: the Halti–Guolasjávri area revisited Detrital zircons of the vast Triassic Snadd and De Geerdalen formations, Barents Shelf, reveal temporal changes in sediment source Jurassic heritance of the geomorphology in Mid Norway Gas seeps in Norwegian waters – distribution and mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1