美国专业药物、专业药房和生物仿制药的管理

R. Brook, M. Sax, J. A. Carlisle, J. Smeeding
{"title":"美国专业药物、专业药房和生物仿制药的管理","authors":"R. Brook, M. Sax, J. A. Carlisle, J. Smeeding","doi":"10.1080/21556660.2019.1658331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Specialty medicines continue to increase as a percentage of spending with biologics representing a large portion of specialty spending. Health plans expect to adjust their formularies to maximize expected savings from biosimilars. Objectives: A better understanding of health plan management of specialty pharmacy (SP), SP products and biosimilars. Methods: Online survey of health plan executives on: roles and plan information, specialty pharmacies and specialty pharmaceuticals, expected biosimilar coverage/restrictions/copays. Results were compared with prior surveys (changes >2% reported). Results: Survey completed by 85 respondents: 42.9% were senior officers, 13.1% regional, 8.3% payor specific, 1.2% therapeutic area specific; 36.9% worked for healthplans, 13.1% PBMs, 9.5% IDNs, 2.4% PPOs/IPAs, 1.2% Government. Plans were national = 29.9%, regional = 24.7% or local = 22.1% and cover multiple member types: commercial (58.6% = FFS, 77.8% = HMO/PPO), Medicaid (Traditional = 27.8%, HMO/PPO = 72.3%), Medicare (71%, PDP-only = 51%), Employer/Self-funded = 79% and IDN (43.6%, 340B Qualified = 43.8%); 45.6% reported the plan’s PBM as their SP provider and providers were restricted by 58% ↓23% with plans restricting products: 58% to those under contract, 11.6% for those available through multiple SPs, 10.1% allow any SP handling a product and 4.4% carving out their SPs. Compared with last year, providers shifted approximately 6% from independents to internally provided and currently 45.6% are PBM owned, 38.2% health plan owned, 25% independent and 13.2% hospital/IDN owned. SP products continue to move from fixed to percentage copays with more plans determining by group and benefit design. Plans covered clinician-administered products under the medical benefit (36.8%↓7.3%), 2.9% under the pharmacy benefit; the remainder used price and plan design. Biosimilar use expected for all reference product indications 58.8%↓5.7%, 31.4%↓13.5% will restrict to approved indications and 9.8% will use indication as the basis for copay. 10%↓15% expect the biosimilar to be the only product available, copays are expected to be discounted off the innovator 58%↓10.1% and 32%↓4.9% to vary based on approval timing. Biosimilar education provided through: different copays = 64.7%, prescriber and patient mailings (76.5%↓4.2% + 58.8%), prescriber and patient calls (51%↓10.6% + 27.5%↑4.1%). Biosimilar savings are expected to be 63.5% this year; in 5 years, 66% of savings are expected to be greater than 20%. Conclusions: Costs associated with specialty pharmacies and specialty pharmacy products have shifted and are expected to grow with some relief coming from biosimilars.","PeriodicalId":15631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658331","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of specialty drugs, specialty pharmacies and biosimilars in the United States\",\"authors\":\"R. Brook, M. Sax, J. A. Carlisle, J. Smeeding\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21556660.2019.1658331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Specialty medicines continue to increase as a percentage of spending with biologics representing a large portion of specialty spending. Health plans expect to adjust their formularies to maximize expected savings from biosimilars. Objectives: A better understanding of health plan management of specialty pharmacy (SP), SP products and biosimilars. Methods: Online survey of health plan executives on: roles and plan information, specialty pharmacies and specialty pharmaceuticals, expected biosimilar coverage/restrictions/copays. Results were compared with prior surveys (changes >2% reported). Results: Survey completed by 85 respondents: 42.9% were senior officers, 13.1% regional, 8.3% payor specific, 1.2% therapeutic area specific; 36.9% worked for healthplans, 13.1% PBMs, 9.5% IDNs, 2.4% PPOs/IPAs, 1.2% Government. Plans were national = 29.9%, regional = 24.7% or local = 22.1% and cover multiple member types: commercial (58.6% = FFS, 77.8% = HMO/PPO), Medicaid (Traditional = 27.8%, HMO/PPO = 72.3%), Medicare (71%, PDP-only = 51%), Employer/Self-funded = 79% and IDN (43.6%, 340B Qualified = 43.8%); 45.6% reported the plan’s PBM as their SP provider and providers were restricted by 58% ↓23% with plans restricting products: 58% to those under contract, 11.6% for those available through multiple SPs, 10.1% allow any SP handling a product and 4.4% carving out their SPs. Compared with last year, providers shifted approximately 6% from independents to internally provided and currently 45.6% are PBM owned, 38.2% health plan owned, 25% independent and 13.2% hospital/IDN owned. SP products continue to move from fixed to percentage copays with more plans determining by group and benefit design. Plans covered clinician-administered products under the medical benefit (36.8%↓7.3%), 2.9% under the pharmacy benefit; the remainder used price and plan design. Biosimilar use expected for all reference product indications 58.8%↓5.7%, 31.4%↓13.5% will restrict to approved indications and 9.8% will use indication as the basis for copay. 10%↓15% expect the biosimilar to be the only product available, copays are expected to be discounted off the innovator 58%↓10.1% and 32%↓4.9% to vary based on approval timing. Biosimilar education provided through: different copays = 64.7%, prescriber and patient mailings (76.5%↓4.2% + 58.8%), prescriber and patient calls (51%↓10.6% + 27.5%↑4.1%). Biosimilar savings are expected to be 63.5% this year; in 5 years, 66% of savings are expected to be greater than 20%. Conclusions: Costs associated with specialty pharmacies and specialty pharmacy products have shifted and are expected to grow with some relief coming from biosimilars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Drug Assessment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658331\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Drug Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要背景:专业药物在支出中所占的比例继续增加,生物制品在专业支出中占很大一部分。健康计划预计将调整其配方,以最大限度地提高生物仿制药的预期节约。目的:更好地了解专科药房(SP)、SP产品和生物仿制药的健康计划管理。方法:对健康计划执行人员进行在线调查,内容包括:角色和计划信息、专业药店和专业药品、预期生物仿制药覆盖率/限制/自付垫底费。将结果与之前的调查进行比较(报告的变化>2%)。结果:85名受访者完成了调查:42.9%为高级官员,13.1%为地区官员,8.3%为特定付款人,1.2%为特定治疗领域官员;36.9%为健康计划工作,13.1%为PBM工作,9.5%为IDN工作,2.4%为PPO/IPA工作,1.2%为政府工作。计划是全国性的 = 29.9%,区域 = 24.7%或本地 = 22.1%,涵盖多种会员类型:商业(58.6% = FFS,77.8% = HMO/PPO)、医疗补助(传统 = 27.8%,HMO/PPO = 72.3%),医疗保险(71%,仅PDP = 51%),雇主/自筹资金 = 79%和IDN(43.6%,340B合格 = 43.8%);45.6%的人将该计划的PBM报告为其SP提供商,58%的提供商受到限制↓23%的计划限制产品:58%的计划限制合同下的产品,11.6%的计划限制通过多个SP提供的产品,10.1%的计划允许任何SP处理产品,4.4%的计划取消其SP。与去年相比,提供者从独立提供者转变为内部提供者,目前45.6%为PBM所有,38.2%为健康计划所有,25%为独立提供者,13.2%为医院/IDN所有。SP产品继续从固定自付额转向百分比自付额,更多计划由团体和福利设计决定。计划涵盖医疗福利下的临床医生管理的产品(36.8%↓7.3%),在药房福利下为2.9%;其余采用价格和方案设计。所有参考产品适应症预期使用生物仿制药58.8%↓5.7%、31.4%↓13.5%将仅限于批准的适应症,9.8%将使用适应症作为自付垫底费的基础。10%↓15%的人预计生物仿制药将是唯一可用的产品,预计创新者的自付垫底费将打折58%↓10.1%和32%↓4.9%根据批准时间而变化。通过以下方式提供生物相似性教育:不同的共付额 = 64.7%,处方医生和患者邮件(76.5%↓4.2%+58.8%)、处方医生和患者电话(51%↓10.6% + 27.5%↑4.1%)。今年生物仿制药预计将节省63.5%;5年后,预计66%的储蓄将超过20%。结论:与专业药房和专业药房产品相关的成本已经发生了变化,预计还会随着生物仿制药的缓解而增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of specialty drugs, specialty pharmacies and biosimilars in the United States
Abstract Background: Specialty medicines continue to increase as a percentage of spending with biologics representing a large portion of specialty spending. Health plans expect to adjust their formularies to maximize expected savings from biosimilars. Objectives: A better understanding of health plan management of specialty pharmacy (SP), SP products and biosimilars. Methods: Online survey of health plan executives on: roles and plan information, specialty pharmacies and specialty pharmaceuticals, expected biosimilar coverage/restrictions/copays. Results were compared with prior surveys (changes >2% reported). Results: Survey completed by 85 respondents: 42.9% were senior officers, 13.1% regional, 8.3% payor specific, 1.2% therapeutic area specific; 36.9% worked for healthplans, 13.1% PBMs, 9.5% IDNs, 2.4% PPOs/IPAs, 1.2% Government. Plans were national = 29.9%, regional = 24.7% or local = 22.1% and cover multiple member types: commercial (58.6% = FFS, 77.8% = HMO/PPO), Medicaid (Traditional = 27.8%, HMO/PPO = 72.3%), Medicare (71%, PDP-only = 51%), Employer/Self-funded = 79% and IDN (43.6%, 340B Qualified = 43.8%); 45.6% reported the plan’s PBM as their SP provider and providers were restricted by 58% ↓23% with plans restricting products: 58% to those under contract, 11.6% for those available through multiple SPs, 10.1% allow any SP handling a product and 4.4% carving out their SPs. Compared with last year, providers shifted approximately 6% from independents to internally provided and currently 45.6% are PBM owned, 38.2% health plan owned, 25% independent and 13.2% hospital/IDN owned. SP products continue to move from fixed to percentage copays with more plans determining by group and benefit design. Plans covered clinician-administered products under the medical benefit (36.8%↓7.3%), 2.9% under the pharmacy benefit; the remainder used price and plan design. Biosimilar use expected for all reference product indications 58.8%↓5.7%, 31.4%↓13.5% will restrict to approved indications and 9.8% will use indication as the basis for copay. 10%↓15% expect the biosimilar to be the only product available, copays are expected to be discounted off the innovator 58%↓10.1% and 32%↓4.9% to vary based on approval timing. Biosimilar education provided through: different copays = 64.7%, prescriber and patient mailings (76.5%↓4.2% + 58.8%), prescriber and patient calls (51%↓10.6% + 27.5%↑4.1%). Biosimilar savings are expected to be 63.5% this year; in 5 years, 66% of savings are expected to be greater than 20%. Conclusions: Costs associated with specialty pharmacies and specialty pharmacy products have shifted and are expected to grow with some relief coming from biosimilars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Assessment
Journal of Drug Assessment PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews. Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses. Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea. A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in an Arab population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1