父母对孩子的上网行为到底了解多少?以色列父母与子女之间的差异

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Children and Media Pub Date : 2022-02-13 DOI:10.1080/17482798.2022.2038223
M. Kalman-Halevi, R. Tutian, Y. Peled
{"title":"父母对孩子的上网行为到底了解多少?以色列父母与子女之间的差异","authors":"M. Kalman-Halevi, R. Tutian, Y. Peled","doi":"10.1080/17482798.2022.2038223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examined the discrepancies between the perceptions of fathers, mothers and children’s perceptions regarding internet use mediation strategies (enabling and restrictive) and their relations with child disclosure. Fifty families participated in the study (father, mother, and child). It was found that there were discrepancies between children’s perception of their parents’ restrictive and enabling mediation strategies, and their parents’ reporting of those mediation strategies. Child disclosure of his/her browsing experiences with the mother was positively related with her use of both restrictive and enabling mediation strategies, but not with the father’s use of these strategies, nor for mother–father discrepancies. This study makes an important contribution by measuring all three members of the triad and explores the family unit and its implication on children’s disclosure. IMPACT SUMMARY Prior State of Knowledge: Most of the research on mediation strategies has focused on mothers’ behaviours, with most data gathered either by child or mother reports. This ignores the role of the father. Novel Contributions: We relied on both parents and their child to report on mediation strategies, the discrepancies between the parents and examine how those discrepancies explain the extent to which their child discloses his/her browsing experiences. Practical Implications: The ability to disclose difficulties may be a primary resource for the ability to benefit from social support at times of need. It is of great importance for the children to share their experiences with their parents.","PeriodicalId":46908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What do parents really know about their child’s online behaviour? Discrepancies between parents and their children in Israel\",\"authors\":\"M. Kalman-Halevi, R. Tutian, Y. Peled\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17482798.2022.2038223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study examined the discrepancies between the perceptions of fathers, mothers and children’s perceptions regarding internet use mediation strategies (enabling and restrictive) and their relations with child disclosure. Fifty families participated in the study (father, mother, and child). It was found that there were discrepancies between children’s perception of their parents’ restrictive and enabling mediation strategies, and their parents’ reporting of those mediation strategies. Child disclosure of his/her browsing experiences with the mother was positively related with her use of both restrictive and enabling mediation strategies, but not with the father’s use of these strategies, nor for mother–father discrepancies. This study makes an important contribution by measuring all three members of the triad and explores the family unit and its implication on children’s disclosure. IMPACT SUMMARY Prior State of Knowledge: Most of the research on mediation strategies has focused on mothers’ behaviours, with most data gathered either by child or mother reports. This ignores the role of the father. Novel Contributions: We relied on both parents and their child to report on mediation strategies, the discrepancies between the parents and examine how those discrepancies explain the extent to which their child discloses his/her browsing experiences. Practical Implications: The ability to disclose difficulties may be a primary resource for the ability to benefit from social support at times of need. It is of great importance for the children to share their experiences with their parents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Children and Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Children and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2022.2038223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children and Media","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2022.2038223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本研究考察了父亲、母亲和儿童对互联网使用调解策略(允许和限制)的认知差异及其与儿童信息披露的关系。50个家庭参与了这项研究(父亲、母亲和孩子)。研究发现,儿童对父母的限制性和支持性调解策略的认知与父母对这些调解策略的报告存在差异。儿童披露他/她与母亲的浏览经历与她使用限制性和支持性调解策略呈正相关,但与父亲使用这些策略无关,也与母亲-父亲差异无关。本研究的重要贡献在于测量了三要素的所有成员,并探讨了家庭单位及其对儿童披露的影响。影响总结先前的知识状况:大多数关于调解策略的研究都集中在母亲的行为上,大多数数据都是通过儿童或母亲报告收集的。这忽略了父亲的角色。新颖的贡献:我们依靠父母和他们的孩子来报告调解策略,父母之间的差异,并研究这些差异如何解释他们的孩子透露他/她的浏览经历的程度。实际意义:披露困难的能力可能是在需要时从社会支持中获益的能力的主要来源。孩子们与父母分享他们的经历是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What do parents really know about their child’s online behaviour? Discrepancies between parents and their children in Israel
ABSTRACT This study examined the discrepancies between the perceptions of fathers, mothers and children’s perceptions regarding internet use mediation strategies (enabling and restrictive) and their relations with child disclosure. Fifty families participated in the study (father, mother, and child). It was found that there were discrepancies between children’s perception of their parents’ restrictive and enabling mediation strategies, and their parents’ reporting of those mediation strategies. Child disclosure of his/her browsing experiences with the mother was positively related with her use of both restrictive and enabling mediation strategies, but not with the father’s use of these strategies, nor for mother–father discrepancies. This study makes an important contribution by measuring all three members of the triad and explores the family unit and its implication on children’s disclosure. IMPACT SUMMARY Prior State of Knowledge: Most of the research on mediation strategies has focused on mothers’ behaviours, with most data gathered either by child or mother reports. This ignores the role of the father. Novel Contributions: We relied on both parents and their child to report on mediation strategies, the discrepancies between the parents and examine how those discrepancies explain the extent to which their child discloses his/her browsing experiences. Practical Implications: The ability to disclose difficulties may be a primary resource for the ability to benefit from social support at times of need. It is of great importance for the children to share their experiences with their parents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Parents’ understandings of social media algorithms in children’s lives in England: Misunderstandings, parked understandings, transactional understandings and proactive understandings amidst datafication Increasing knowledge about cognitive biases: An evaluation study of a radicalization prevention campaign targeted at European adolescents and young adults Characters’ realism, not familiarity, improved Chinese Children’s learning from video Consent culture and teen films: Adolescent sexuality in U.S. movies Respecting children`s rights in research ethics and research methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1