书评

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Biblical Theology Bulletin Pub Date : 2021-01-27 DOI:10.1177/0146107920980935
K. C. Hanson, Andrew W. Dyck, Jaime L. Waters, H. Paynter, D. Zucker, Olegs Andrejevs, M. Porto, Wendel Sun, Alexander E. Stewart, S. Elliott, E. Stewart
{"title":"书评","authors":"K. C. Hanson, Andrew W. Dyck, Jaime L. Waters, H. Paynter, D. Zucker, Olegs Andrejevs, M. Porto, Wendel Sun, Alexander E. Stewart, S. Elliott, E. Stewart","doi":"10.1177/0146107920980935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fractured states: smallpox, public health and vaccination in British India is the first book-length treatment that details the development and implementation of public health policies to control smallpox in British India between 1800 and 1947. The book takes an interdisciplinary approach shaped by the collaboration of its three co-authors whose expertise in South Asian studies and history of medicine is legion. It is a significant contribution to the history of smallpox, and public health. Using vaccination as a case study, it also offers a fresh perspective in the political history of British India by delving into the complex machinery of the colonial government. It is, appropriately, a volume of Orient Longman’s New Perspectives in South Asian History in which it is followed by the smallpox story from India’s independence to its eradication on the Indian subcontinent: Sanjoy Bhattacharya’s Expunging variola: the control and eradication of smallpox in India 1947–1977 (2006). This work employs two principal analytic approaches that roughly divide the book into two halves. The first half is a detailed structural analysis of the development of smallpox controls and public health policies that ‘‘between 1890 and 1940 mirrored the fractured nature of the colonial Indian administrative structures’’(p. 9). By focusing on the interand intra-governmental economic and political relationships that shaped smallpox control strategies (vaccination, isolation, and infectious disease notification), the authors depart from the standard historiography that tends to blame the relatively slow uptake of vaccination in India on indigenous resistance, or British imperialism. The authors point out that historians constructing narratives around the colonizers and the colonized tend to focus on the concerns of the senior bureaucrats and scientists, laws and regulations, and in doing so have distorted the picture of the diverse and often conflicting in-the-field execution of state policies. In this book, race and religious opposition to vaccination, often featured in reports by British bureaucrats, are portrayed as proxy explanations for a more nuanced and contingent set of political interests, petty disputes within government agencies, and the diverse power relationships between all levels of government and, of course, the public. For example, they argue that tensions and conflicts arose frequently between British bureaucrats, and within government departments, such that even when adequate funds were available, vaccination was occasionally impeded by the competing interests of various government officials. This systems analysis sheds new light on the idiosyncratic uptake of vaccination technology in India throughout the period of study. The second half of the book explores the technical and medical history of vaccine research in India to explain trends in the perception and uptake of the different vaccination technologies. By the late nineteenth century, it was obvious to both Indian and British civil servants that western vaccination techniques and seed strains had to be adapted for the Indian sub-continent, due to the technical challenges of preserving and maintaining pure and reactive vaccine lymph. Government-supported provincial vaccine institutes became centres for such vaccine innovation. Vaccination and re-vaccination itself played a larger role in Indian strategies to control the disease because of the lack of infrastructure for quarantine, and because the","PeriodicalId":41921,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Theology Bulletin","volume":"51 1","pages":"47 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0146107920980935","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Reviews\",\"authors\":\"K. C. Hanson, Andrew W. Dyck, Jaime L. Waters, H. Paynter, D. Zucker, Olegs Andrejevs, M. Porto, Wendel Sun, Alexander E. Stewart, S. Elliott, E. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0146107920980935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fractured states: smallpox, public health and vaccination in British India is the first book-length treatment that details the development and implementation of public health policies to control smallpox in British India between 1800 and 1947. The book takes an interdisciplinary approach shaped by the collaboration of its three co-authors whose expertise in South Asian studies and history of medicine is legion. It is a significant contribution to the history of smallpox, and public health. Using vaccination as a case study, it also offers a fresh perspective in the political history of British India by delving into the complex machinery of the colonial government. It is, appropriately, a volume of Orient Longman’s New Perspectives in South Asian History in which it is followed by the smallpox story from India’s independence to its eradication on the Indian subcontinent: Sanjoy Bhattacharya’s Expunging variola: the control and eradication of smallpox in India 1947–1977 (2006). This work employs two principal analytic approaches that roughly divide the book into two halves. The first half is a detailed structural analysis of the development of smallpox controls and public health policies that ‘‘between 1890 and 1940 mirrored the fractured nature of the colonial Indian administrative structures’’(p. 9). By focusing on the interand intra-governmental economic and political relationships that shaped smallpox control strategies (vaccination, isolation, and infectious disease notification), the authors depart from the standard historiography that tends to blame the relatively slow uptake of vaccination in India on indigenous resistance, or British imperialism. The authors point out that historians constructing narratives around the colonizers and the colonized tend to focus on the concerns of the senior bureaucrats and scientists, laws and regulations, and in doing so have distorted the picture of the diverse and often conflicting in-the-field execution of state policies. In this book, race and religious opposition to vaccination, often featured in reports by British bureaucrats, are portrayed as proxy explanations for a more nuanced and contingent set of political interests, petty disputes within government agencies, and the diverse power relationships between all levels of government and, of course, the public. For example, they argue that tensions and conflicts arose frequently between British bureaucrats, and within government departments, such that even when adequate funds were available, vaccination was occasionally impeded by the competing interests of various government officials. This systems analysis sheds new light on the idiosyncratic uptake of vaccination technology in India throughout the period of study. The second half of the book explores the technical and medical history of vaccine research in India to explain trends in the perception and uptake of the different vaccination technologies. By the late nineteenth century, it was obvious to both Indian and British civil servants that western vaccination techniques and seed strains had to be adapted for the Indian sub-continent, due to the technical challenges of preserving and maintaining pure and reactive vaccine lymph. Government-supported provincial vaccine institutes became centres for such vaccine innovation. Vaccination and re-vaccination itself played a larger role in Indian strategies to control the disease because of the lack of infrastructure for quarantine, and because the\",\"PeriodicalId\":41921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biblical Theology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"47 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0146107920980935\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biblical Theology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0146107920980935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Theology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0146107920980935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《破碎的国家:英属印度的天花、公共卫生和疫苗接种》是第一本详细介绍1800年至1947年英属印度控制天花的公共卫生政策的发展和实施的书。这本书采用了跨学科的方法,由三位在南亚研究和医学史方面具有丰富专业知识的合著者合作形成。这是对天花史和公共卫生的重大贡献。以疫苗接种为案例研究,通过深入研究殖民政府的复杂机制,它也为英属印度的政治史提供了一个新的视角。恰当地说,这是东方朗曼的《南亚历史的新视角》的一卷,在这本书之后是印度从独立到在印度次大陆消灭天花的故事:Sanjoy Bhattacharya的《消灭天花:1947-1977年印度天花的控制和根除》(2006)。这项工作采用了两种主要的分析方法,大致将本书分为两部分。前半部分对天花控制和公共卫生政策的发展进行了详细的结构分析,“1890年至1940年间反映了殖民地印度行政结构的断裂性质”。9)通过关注政府间和政府内部的经济和政治关系,这些关系形成了天花控制策略(疫苗接种、隔离和传染病通报),作者偏离了标准的史学,即倾向于将印度相对缓慢的疫苗接种归咎于本土抵抗或英国帝国主义。作者指出,围绕殖民者和被殖民者构建叙事的历史学家倾向于关注高级官僚和科学家、法律和法规,这样做扭曲了国家政策执行的多样性和经常相互冲突的图景。在这本书中,种族和宗教对疫苗接种的反对,经常出现在英国官僚的报告中,被描绘成一组更微妙和偶然的政治利益的代理解释,政府机构内部的小争端,以及各级政府之间不同的权力关系,当然,还有公众。例如,他们认为,英国官僚之间和政府部门内部经常出现紧张和冲突,因此,即使有足够的资金,疫苗接种偶尔也会受到各种政府官员利益竞争的阻碍。这一系统分析揭示了在整个研究期间印度对疫苗接种技术的特殊吸收。本书的后半部分探讨了印度疫苗研究的技术和医学史,以解释不同疫苗接种技术的感知和吸收趋势。到19世纪后期,印度和英国的公务员都很清楚,由于保存和维持纯净和活性疫苗淋巴的技术挑战,西方的疫苗接种技术和种子菌株必须适应印度次大陆。政府支持的省级疫苗研究所成为这种疫苗创新的中心。疫苗接种和再接种本身在印度控制疾病的战略中发挥了更大的作用,因为缺乏检疫基础设施,而且因为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Reviews
Fractured states: smallpox, public health and vaccination in British India is the first book-length treatment that details the development and implementation of public health policies to control smallpox in British India between 1800 and 1947. The book takes an interdisciplinary approach shaped by the collaboration of its three co-authors whose expertise in South Asian studies and history of medicine is legion. It is a significant contribution to the history of smallpox, and public health. Using vaccination as a case study, it also offers a fresh perspective in the political history of British India by delving into the complex machinery of the colonial government. It is, appropriately, a volume of Orient Longman’s New Perspectives in South Asian History in which it is followed by the smallpox story from India’s independence to its eradication on the Indian subcontinent: Sanjoy Bhattacharya’s Expunging variola: the control and eradication of smallpox in India 1947–1977 (2006). This work employs two principal analytic approaches that roughly divide the book into two halves. The first half is a detailed structural analysis of the development of smallpox controls and public health policies that ‘‘between 1890 and 1940 mirrored the fractured nature of the colonial Indian administrative structures’’(p. 9). By focusing on the interand intra-governmental economic and political relationships that shaped smallpox control strategies (vaccination, isolation, and infectious disease notification), the authors depart from the standard historiography that tends to blame the relatively slow uptake of vaccination in India on indigenous resistance, or British imperialism. The authors point out that historians constructing narratives around the colonizers and the colonized tend to focus on the concerns of the senior bureaucrats and scientists, laws and regulations, and in doing so have distorted the picture of the diverse and often conflicting in-the-field execution of state policies. In this book, race and religious opposition to vaccination, often featured in reports by British bureaucrats, are portrayed as proxy explanations for a more nuanced and contingent set of political interests, petty disputes within government agencies, and the diverse power relationships between all levels of government and, of course, the public. For example, they argue that tensions and conflicts arose frequently between British bureaucrats, and within government departments, such that even when adequate funds were available, vaccination was occasionally impeded by the competing interests of various government officials. This systems analysis sheds new light on the idiosyncratic uptake of vaccination technology in India throughout the period of study. The second half of the book explores the technical and medical history of vaccine research in India to explain trends in the perception and uptake of the different vaccination technologies. By the late nineteenth century, it was obvious to both Indian and British civil servants that western vaccination techniques and seed strains had to be adapted for the Indian sub-continent, due to the technical challenges of preserving and maintaining pure and reactive vaccine lymph. Government-supported provincial vaccine institutes became centres for such vaccine innovation. Vaccination and re-vaccination itself played a larger role in Indian strategies to control the disease because of the lack of infrastructure for quarantine, and because the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Biblical Theology Bulletin is a distinctive, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal containing articles and reviews written by experts in biblical and theological studies. The editors select articles that provide insights derived from critical biblical scholarship, culture-awareness, and thoughtful reflection on meanings of import for scholars of Bible and religion, religious educators, clergy, and those engaged with social studies in religion, inter-religious studies, and the praxis of biblical religion today. The journal began publication in 1971. It has been distinguished for its early and continuing publication of articles using the social sciences in addition to other critical methods for interpreting the Bible for contemporary readers, teachers, and preachers across cultural and denominational lines.
期刊最新文献
The Ideal Meal: Masculinity and Disability among Host and Guests in Luke Fertility, Slavery, and Biblical Interpretation: John Chrysostom on the Story of Sarah and Hagar Disability as a Symbol of Terror: Rereading the David Narrative in Light of Armed Conflicts in Africa Reading Ancient Temples through the Lens of Disability Studies and Mobility Design Presenting the Issue: Reading Biblical Texts in Conversation with Disability Studies and Health Humanities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1