Caroline Sahli Lozano, Kathrin Brandenberg, Anne Sophie Ganz, S. Wüthrich
{"title":"适应、修改和特殊教育干预:对教师期望的影响","authors":"Caroline Sahli Lozano, Kathrin Brandenberg, Anne Sophie Ganz, S. Wüthrich","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2022.2103571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Students with special educational needs (SEN) are at risk of lower teacher expectations due to disability-related negative labelling effects. In most educational systems, students with SEN receive measures such as accommodations (adjustments of the learning/assessment conditions), curriculum modifications (adjustments of the learning objectives), or additional support from special education teachers to support inclusion in regular school. Here, we examine whether the receipt of such measures, even in the absence of a formally assessed SEN or disability diagnosis, is sufficient to evoke negative labelling effects. Using data from 110 lower secondary school classes in Switzerland, we show that students with reduced learning objectives or individual support by a special education teacher get systematically underestimated by their teachers regarding their cognitive abilities, although this is not the case for students receiving accommodations. These findings provide important implications for the application of such measures and the prevention of educational inequalities.","PeriodicalId":47025,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research and Evaluation","volume":"27 1","pages":"396 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accommodations, modifications, and special education interventions: influence on teacher expectations\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Sahli Lozano, Kathrin Brandenberg, Anne Sophie Ganz, S. Wüthrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13803611.2022.2103571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Students with special educational needs (SEN) are at risk of lower teacher expectations due to disability-related negative labelling effects. In most educational systems, students with SEN receive measures such as accommodations (adjustments of the learning/assessment conditions), curriculum modifications (adjustments of the learning objectives), or additional support from special education teachers to support inclusion in regular school. Here, we examine whether the receipt of such measures, even in the absence of a formally assessed SEN or disability diagnosis, is sufficient to evoke negative labelling effects. Using data from 110 lower secondary school classes in Switzerland, we show that students with reduced learning objectives or individual support by a special education teacher get systematically underestimated by their teachers regarding their cognitive abilities, although this is not the case for students receiving accommodations. These findings provide important implications for the application of such measures and the prevention of educational inequalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"396 - 419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2103571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2103571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accommodations, modifications, and special education interventions: influence on teacher expectations
ABSTRACT Students with special educational needs (SEN) are at risk of lower teacher expectations due to disability-related negative labelling effects. In most educational systems, students with SEN receive measures such as accommodations (adjustments of the learning/assessment conditions), curriculum modifications (adjustments of the learning objectives), or additional support from special education teachers to support inclusion in regular school. Here, we examine whether the receipt of such measures, even in the absence of a formally assessed SEN or disability diagnosis, is sufficient to evoke negative labelling effects. Using data from 110 lower secondary school classes in Switzerland, we show that students with reduced learning objectives or individual support by a special education teacher get systematically underestimated by their teachers regarding their cognitive abilities, although this is not the case for students receiving accommodations. These findings provide important implications for the application of such measures and the prevention of educational inequalities.
期刊介绍:
International, comparative and multidisciplinary in scope, Educational Research and Evaluation (ERE) publishes original, peer-reviewed academic articles dealing with research on issues of worldwide relevance in educational practice. The aim of the journal is to increase understanding of learning in pre-primary, primary, high school, college, university and adult education, and to contribute to the improvement of educational processes and outcomes. The journal seeks to promote cross-national and international comparative educational research by publishing findings relevant to the scholarly community, as well as to practitioners and others interested in education. The scope of the journal is deliberately broad in terms of both topics covered and disciplinary perspective.