适应、修改和特殊教育干预:对教师期望的影响

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research and Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI:10.1080/13803611.2022.2103571
Caroline Sahli Lozano, Kathrin Brandenberg, Anne Sophie Ganz, S. Wüthrich
{"title":"适应、修改和特殊教育干预:对教师期望的影响","authors":"Caroline Sahli Lozano, Kathrin Brandenberg, Anne Sophie Ganz, S. Wüthrich","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2022.2103571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Students with special educational needs (SEN) are at risk of lower teacher expectations due to disability-related negative labelling effects. In most educational systems, students with SEN receive measures such as accommodations (adjustments of the learning/assessment conditions), curriculum modifications (adjustments of the learning objectives), or additional support from special education teachers to support inclusion in regular school. Here, we examine whether the receipt of such measures, even in the absence of a formally assessed SEN or disability diagnosis, is sufficient to evoke negative labelling effects. Using data from 110 lower secondary school classes in Switzerland, we show that students with reduced learning objectives or individual support by a special education teacher get systematically underestimated by their teachers regarding their cognitive abilities, although this is not the case for students receiving accommodations. These findings provide important implications for the application of such measures and the prevention of educational inequalities.","PeriodicalId":47025,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research and Evaluation","volume":"27 1","pages":"396 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accommodations, modifications, and special education interventions: influence on teacher expectations\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Sahli Lozano, Kathrin Brandenberg, Anne Sophie Ganz, S. Wüthrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13803611.2022.2103571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Students with special educational needs (SEN) are at risk of lower teacher expectations due to disability-related negative labelling effects. In most educational systems, students with SEN receive measures such as accommodations (adjustments of the learning/assessment conditions), curriculum modifications (adjustments of the learning objectives), or additional support from special education teachers to support inclusion in regular school. Here, we examine whether the receipt of such measures, even in the absence of a formally assessed SEN or disability diagnosis, is sufficient to evoke negative labelling effects. Using data from 110 lower secondary school classes in Switzerland, we show that students with reduced learning objectives or individual support by a special education teacher get systematically underestimated by their teachers regarding their cognitive abilities, although this is not the case for students receiving accommodations. These findings provide important implications for the application of such measures and the prevention of educational inequalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"396 - 419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2103571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2103571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于残疾相关的负面标签效应,有特殊教育需要(SEN)的学生面临着教师期望较低的风险。在大多数教育系统中,特殊教育学生会得到一些措施,如适应(学习/评估条件的调整)、课程修改(学习目标的调整)或特殊教育教师的额外支持,以支持他们融入普通学校。在这里,我们研究是否接受这样的措施,即使没有正式评估SEN或残疾诊断,足以引起负面标签效应。利用瑞士110个初中班级的数据,我们表明,学习目标较低或得到特殊教育老师个人支持的学生,他们的老师会系统性地低估他们的认知能力,尽管对于接受住宿的学生来说,情况并非如此。这些发现对这些措施的应用和防止教育不平等具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accommodations, modifications, and special education interventions: influence on teacher expectations
ABSTRACT Students with special educational needs (SEN) are at risk of lower teacher expectations due to disability-related negative labelling effects. In most educational systems, students with SEN receive measures such as accommodations (adjustments of the learning/assessment conditions), curriculum modifications (adjustments of the learning objectives), or additional support from special education teachers to support inclusion in regular school. Here, we examine whether the receipt of such measures, even in the absence of a formally assessed SEN or disability diagnosis, is sufficient to evoke negative labelling effects. Using data from 110 lower secondary school classes in Switzerland, we show that students with reduced learning objectives or individual support by a special education teacher get systematically underestimated by their teachers regarding their cognitive abilities, although this is not the case for students receiving accommodations. These findings provide important implications for the application of such measures and the prevention of educational inequalities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research and Evaluation
Educational Research and Evaluation EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: International, comparative and multidisciplinary in scope, Educational Research and Evaluation (ERE) publishes original, peer-reviewed academic articles dealing with research on issues of worldwide relevance in educational practice. The aim of the journal is to increase understanding of learning in pre-primary, primary, high school, college, university and adult education, and to contribute to the improvement of educational processes and outcomes. The journal seeks to promote cross-national and international comparative educational research by publishing findings relevant to the scholarly community, as well as to practitioners and others interested in education. The scope of the journal is deliberately broad in terms of both topics covered and disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ effects on student achievement in the United States from a cumulative perspective The impact of self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies on students’ achievements in STEM disciplines Distributed leadership, self-awareness, democracy, and sustainable development: towards an integrative model of school effectiveness Does formal teacher competence matter for students’ mathematics achievement? Results from Swedish TIMSS 2019 Case study of the use of learner-centered assessment in the math school of a large university in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1