复合材料修复中“通用”粘结剂的潜力

F. Staxrud, H. Valen
{"title":"复合材料修复中“通用”粘结剂的潜力","authors":"F. Staxrud, H. Valen","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2022.2073234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim The aim of this in vitro study was to compare nine different bonding agents of so-called universal type with one well-recognized, 3-step etch-and-rinse bonding agent, as control, in a composite-to-composite shear bond strength (SBS) test. Materials and methods Cylindrical composite substrates were made according to manufacturers’ specifications and potted in epoxy according to the description in ISO TS 29022:2003. They were stored in water (37 °C) for 2 months (for water sorption). New composite was bonded to the substrates using nine different bonding agents of universal type, and one 3-step etch-and-rinse bonding agent as control. Fifteen specimens were made for each bonding agent as required by ISO 29022. SBS testing was performed as described in the standard. Vertical load was applied at the speed of 1 mm/min, using a universal testing machine. Two test series were performed: (A) Short term test of SBS after 2 weeks (B) Long term test of SBS after 1-year storage of specimens in water at 37 °C. Results Test results for the short term test (A); composite-to-composite SBS mean values ranged from 12.0 to 24.9 MPa, and for the long term test (B), SBS ranged from 11.4 to 25 MPa. Six universal bonding agents showed significantly higher bond strength than control in 1-year test. Conclusion In this in vitro study, testing shear bond strength of composite-to-composite bonding, the universal bonding agents performed similar and for some agents better than the 3-step etch-and-rinse bonding agent. New simplified bonding procedures seem reliable for repair of composite.","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"9 1","pages":"41 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential of «universal» bonding agents for composite repair\",\"authors\":\"F. Staxrud, H. Valen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26415275.2022.2073234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Aim The aim of this in vitro study was to compare nine different bonding agents of so-called universal type with one well-recognized, 3-step etch-and-rinse bonding agent, as control, in a composite-to-composite shear bond strength (SBS) test. Materials and methods Cylindrical composite substrates were made according to manufacturers’ specifications and potted in epoxy according to the description in ISO TS 29022:2003. They were stored in water (37 °C) for 2 months (for water sorption). New composite was bonded to the substrates using nine different bonding agents of universal type, and one 3-step etch-and-rinse bonding agent as control. Fifteen specimens were made for each bonding agent as required by ISO 29022. SBS testing was performed as described in the standard. Vertical load was applied at the speed of 1 mm/min, using a universal testing machine. Two test series were performed: (A) Short term test of SBS after 2 weeks (B) Long term test of SBS after 1-year storage of specimens in water at 37 °C. Results Test results for the short term test (A); composite-to-composite SBS mean values ranged from 12.0 to 24.9 MPa, and for the long term test (B), SBS ranged from 11.4 to 25 MPa. Six universal bonding agents showed significantly higher bond strength than control in 1-year test. Conclusion In this in vitro study, testing shear bond strength of composite-to-composite bonding, the universal bonding agents performed similar and for some agents better than the 3-step etch-and-rinse bonding agent. New simplified bonding procedures seem reliable for repair of composite.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2073234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2073234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要目的本体外研究的目的是在复合材料对复合材料的剪切结合强度(SBS)测试中,比较九种不同的所谓通用型粘合剂与一种公认的三步蚀刻和漂洗粘合剂作为对照。材料和方法根据制造商的规范制造圆柱形复合基底,并根据ISO TS 29022:2003中的描述在环氧树脂中封装。它们被储存在水中(37 °C) 月(用于吸水)。使用九种不同的通用型粘合剂和一种三步蚀刻和漂洗粘合剂作为对照,将新的复合材料粘合到基底上。根据ISO 29022的要求,为每种粘合剂制作了15个样品。SBS测试按照标准中的描述进行。垂直载荷以1的速度施加 mm/min,使用通用测试机。进行了两个测试系列:(A)SBS在2 周(B)试样在37℃的水中储存1年后SBS的长期试验 °C。结果短期测试的测试结果(A);复合SBS的平均值在12.0-24.9之间 MPa,对于长期试验(B),SBS范围为11.4至25 MPa。在一年的测试中,六种通用粘合剂显示出显著高于对照的粘合强度。结论在本体外研究中,测试了复合材料与复合材料的剪切结合强度,通用粘合剂的性能与三步蚀刻-漂洗粘合剂相似,并且在某些情况下优于三步蚀刻和漂洗粘合剂。新的简化粘合程序似乎对复合材料的修复是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Potential of «universal» bonding agents for composite repair
Abstract Aim The aim of this in vitro study was to compare nine different bonding agents of so-called universal type with one well-recognized, 3-step etch-and-rinse bonding agent, as control, in a composite-to-composite shear bond strength (SBS) test. Materials and methods Cylindrical composite substrates were made according to manufacturers’ specifications and potted in epoxy according to the description in ISO TS 29022:2003. They were stored in water (37 °C) for 2 months (for water sorption). New composite was bonded to the substrates using nine different bonding agents of universal type, and one 3-step etch-and-rinse bonding agent as control. Fifteen specimens were made for each bonding agent as required by ISO 29022. SBS testing was performed as described in the standard. Vertical load was applied at the speed of 1 mm/min, using a universal testing machine. Two test series were performed: (A) Short term test of SBS after 2 weeks (B) Long term test of SBS after 1-year storage of specimens in water at 37 °C. Results Test results for the short term test (A); composite-to-composite SBS mean values ranged from 12.0 to 24.9 MPa, and for the long term test (B), SBS ranged from 11.4 to 25 MPa. Six universal bonding agents showed significantly higher bond strength than control in 1-year test. Conclusion In this in vitro study, testing shear bond strength of composite-to-composite bonding, the universal bonding agents performed similar and for some agents better than the 3-step etch-and-rinse bonding agent. New simplified bonding procedures seem reliable for repair of composite.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects. Silane and acid etch cross contamination of dentin and composite reduced µ-tensile bond strength. Recipient of Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry's Young Author Award 2023. Reliability and agreement of root length measurements during orthodontic treatment in images from different CBCT machines using multiplanar reconstruction. The sealing ability of different endodontic biomaterials as an intra-orifice barrier: evaluation with high-performance liquid chromatography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1