跨越学科边界:英语与社会学科合作教学的两个故事

Q2 Social Sciences Action in Teacher Education Pub Date : 2020-02-18 DOI:10.1080/01626620.2020.1726836
Yonghee Suh, KaaVonia Hinton
{"title":"跨越学科边界:英语与社会学科合作教学的两个故事","authors":"Yonghee Suh, KaaVonia Hinton","doi":"10.1080/01626620.2020.1726836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This narrative inquiry shares the stories of two teachers’ collaborative experiences with their counterparts in social studies and English. The primary objective was to learn about how these teachers, within separate teaching dyads, understand and attempt to accomplish the goals of both colleagues’ disciplines while planning instruction. Field texts were collected over two years and consist of stories derived from five recorded conversations, observations, e-mail exchanges, student work samples, teaching materials, PowerPoint slides, and reflective notes. Data were analyzed through the three-dimensional space approach. Findings suggest that a) collaborative tensions arise due to “grammar of schooling,” including the structure and the culture of teaching the subject matters in middle and high schools; b) cross-disciplinary collaboration serves as a space for teacher learning; and c) despite their intentions and willingness, the two teachers tend to implement a hybrid of disciplinary literacy practices coupled with their old notion of literacy when collaborating.","PeriodicalId":52183,"journal":{"name":"Action in Teacher Education","volume":"43 1","pages":"321 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01626620.2020.1726836","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Disciplinary Boundaries: Two Stories of Collaborative Teaching in English and Social Studies\",\"authors\":\"Yonghee Suh, KaaVonia Hinton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01626620.2020.1726836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This narrative inquiry shares the stories of two teachers’ collaborative experiences with their counterparts in social studies and English. The primary objective was to learn about how these teachers, within separate teaching dyads, understand and attempt to accomplish the goals of both colleagues’ disciplines while planning instruction. Field texts were collected over two years and consist of stories derived from five recorded conversations, observations, e-mail exchanges, student work samples, teaching materials, PowerPoint slides, and reflective notes. Data were analyzed through the three-dimensional space approach. Findings suggest that a) collaborative tensions arise due to “grammar of schooling,” including the structure and the culture of teaching the subject matters in middle and high schools; b) cross-disciplinary collaboration serves as a space for teacher learning; and c) despite their intentions and willingness, the two teachers tend to implement a hybrid of disciplinary literacy practices coupled with their old notion of literacy when collaborating.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"321 - 338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01626620.2020.1726836\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2020.1726836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2020.1726836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:这篇叙述性调查分享了两位教师在社会研究和英语方面与同行合作的经历。主要目标是了解这些教师如何在单独的教学组合中理解并尝试在规划教学时实现两位同事学科的目标。实地文本是在两年多的时间里收集的,包括来自五次录音对话、观察、电子邮件交流、学生作业样本、教学材料、PowerPoint幻灯片和反思笔记的故事。通过三维空间方法对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,a)合作紧张关系是由于“学校教育的语法”而产生的,包括中学和高中学科教学的结构和文化;b) 跨学科合作是教师学习的空间;c)尽管两位教师有意愿和意愿,但在合作时,他们倾向于将学科识字实践与旧的识字概念相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Navigating Disciplinary Boundaries: Two Stories of Collaborative Teaching in English and Social Studies
ABSTRACT This narrative inquiry shares the stories of two teachers’ collaborative experiences with their counterparts in social studies and English. The primary objective was to learn about how these teachers, within separate teaching dyads, understand and attempt to accomplish the goals of both colleagues’ disciplines while planning instruction. Field texts were collected over two years and consist of stories derived from five recorded conversations, observations, e-mail exchanges, student work samples, teaching materials, PowerPoint slides, and reflective notes. Data were analyzed through the three-dimensional space approach. Findings suggest that a) collaborative tensions arise due to “grammar of schooling,” including the structure and the culture of teaching the subject matters in middle and high schools; b) cross-disciplinary collaboration serves as a space for teacher learning; and c) despite their intentions and willingness, the two teachers tend to implement a hybrid of disciplinary literacy practices coupled with their old notion of literacy when collaborating.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Action in Teacher Education
Action in Teacher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Hurdles and Straightaways: Building a Cross-School Community of Practice White Preservice Teachers and Antiracist Practice: Enabling Trajectories of Learning and Identity in Teacher Preparation Engaging with Engagement: Interrogating Preservice Teachers’ Theories of Engagement in Their Literacy Planning and Reflection Applying an Equity Framework to Develop Inclusive Visions of STEM Teaching: Honoring the Voices of Students with Dis/Abilities Nearby Nature: An Interdisciplinary Science, Literacy, and Technology Project Situated within a Traditional Teacher Preparation Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1