破解储蓄:比较后共产主义俄罗斯和匈牙利的养老金政治-勘误

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Social Policy and Society Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI:10.1017/s1474746423000064
Daria Prisiazhniuk, S. Sokhey
{"title":"破解储蓄:比较后共产主义俄罗斯和匈牙利的养老金政治-勘误","authors":"Daria Prisiazhniuk, S. Sokhey","doi":"10.1017/s1474746423000064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"*Regime type is based on the current Freedom House ranking (Freedom House, 2021). Freedom House rankings are calculated on a weighted scale based on a country’s civil liberties and political rights which are numerically coded and then used to group countries into free, partly free, and not free. The Freedom House scores are highly correlated with another standard measure of democracy, the Polity score, which ranges from -10 to 10 with 10 being the most democratic (Marshall et al., 2019). On Polity, Hungary received a “10” through 2018. Russia received a “3” from 1993-1999, a “6” from 2000-2006, and a “4” from 2007-2018.","PeriodicalId":47397,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy and Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"471 - 471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cracking the Nest Egg: Comparing Pension Politics in Post-Communist Russia and Hungary – ERRATUM\",\"authors\":\"Daria Prisiazhniuk, S. Sokhey\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1474746423000064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"*Regime type is based on the current Freedom House ranking (Freedom House, 2021). Freedom House rankings are calculated on a weighted scale based on a country’s civil liberties and political rights which are numerically coded and then used to group countries into free, partly free, and not free. The Freedom House scores are highly correlated with another standard measure of democracy, the Polity score, which ranges from -10 to 10 with 10 being the most democratic (Marshall et al., 2019). On Polity, Hungary received a “10” through 2018. Russia received a “3” from 1993-1999, a “6” from 2000-2006, and a “4” from 2007-2018.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Policy and Society\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"471 - 471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Policy and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746423000064\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746423000064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

*政权类型基于当前的自由之家排名(自由之家,2021)。自由之家的排名是根据一个国家的公民自由和政治权利的加权量表计算的,这些权利是用数字编码的,然后用来将国家分为自由、部分自由和不自由。自由之家的分数与另一种衡量民主的标准——政治分数高度相关,政治分数从-10到10不等,其中10分是最民主的(Marshall et al.,2019)。在Polity上,匈牙利在2018年之前获得了“10分”。俄罗斯在1993-1999年获得“3”,2000-2006年获得“6”,2007-2018年获得“4”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cracking the Nest Egg: Comparing Pension Politics in Post-Communist Russia and Hungary – ERRATUM
*Regime type is based on the current Freedom House ranking (Freedom House, 2021). Freedom House rankings are calculated on a weighted scale based on a country’s civil liberties and political rights which are numerically coded and then used to group countries into free, partly free, and not free. The Freedom House scores are highly correlated with another standard measure of democracy, the Polity score, which ranges from -10 to 10 with 10 being the most democratic (Marshall et al., 2019). On Polity, Hungary received a “10” through 2018. Russia received a “3” from 1993-1999, a “6” from 2000-2006, and a “4” from 2007-2018.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
The ‘Perfect Storm’: Food Banks and Food Insecurity During the Covid-19 Pandemic Five Factors for Effective Policy to Improve Attitudes towards People with Disability Homelessness Transitions, Risks, and Prevention Across the Life Course Silent Elements of Policy Change: Inflation and Uprating Mechanisms in the Low Countries Exclusionary Mechanisms of Social Policy Redistribution in Hungary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1