Eng Franco Pessana, Sánchez Ramiro, Lev Gustavo, Mirada Micaela, M. Oscar, Ramírez Agustin, Fischer Edmundo Cabrera
{"title":"一种验证使用臂血压评估人类无创主动脉压力的新方法","authors":"Eng Franco Pessana, Sánchez Ramiro, Lev Gustavo, Mirada Micaela, M. Oscar, Ramírez Agustin, Fischer Edmundo Cabrera","doi":"10.23937/2474-3690/1510064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: It has been demonstrated that the noninvasive evaluation of aortic blood pressure has a prognostic value but limited by the inaccuracy linked to technical errors and a differences in the pressure wave analysis. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare two methods used to validate the non-invasively central blood pressure waveforms obtained with an oscillometic device, with those recorded by intra-arterial measurements at the aortic level. Methods: In this study were included 20 subjects, 10 males (68 ± 12-years-old, BMI: 27.4 ± 4.6 Kg/m2) and 10 females (77 ± 8-years-old, BMI: 28.5 ± 5.3 Kg/m2). The analysed cohort was composed of patients with diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invasive and non-invasive data used in this research were previously analysed using a widely reported methodology and published by our group. The invasive aortic pressure recording was synchronically acquired with an oscillometric brachial acquisition and, then a reconstruction of central pressure wave was performed. In this research a correlation analysis using the entire aortic pressure cycle was performed. Results: Coefficient values found of the whole population, using the entire aortic pressure cycle, were similar to those obtained using the mean value of the cBP cardiac cycle (0.88 versus 0.89; respectively). On the contrary, the slope of the regression line determined by invasive versus noninvasive cBP loops (n = 20) using the entire cBP cycle exhibit a remarkable decrease with respect to that obtained using the mean aortic pressure cycle (0.98 versus 0.77). Conclusions: In a first step, applying an interpolation procedure by means of oversampling and digital low pass filter, we found a high correlation between invasive and noninvasive instantaneous aortic pressure waveforms in: Men, women and the whole population, In a second step, results in terms of correlation coefficient and the slope derived from the regression analysis of invasive and non-invasive using a new data analysis allow to confirm high correlation coefficients and a more realistic slope value of the invasive versus non-invasive pressure wave relationship.","PeriodicalId":91747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hypertension and management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings\",\"authors\":\"Eng Franco Pessana, Sánchez Ramiro, Lev Gustavo, Mirada Micaela, M. Oscar, Ramírez Agustin, Fischer Edmundo Cabrera\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2474-3690/1510064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: It has been demonstrated that the noninvasive evaluation of aortic blood pressure has a prognostic value but limited by the inaccuracy linked to technical errors and a differences in the pressure wave analysis. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare two methods used to validate the non-invasively central blood pressure waveforms obtained with an oscillometic device, with those recorded by intra-arterial measurements at the aortic level. Methods: In this study were included 20 subjects, 10 males (68 ± 12-years-old, BMI: 27.4 ± 4.6 Kg/m2) and 10 females (77 ± 8-years-old, BMI: 28.5 ± 5.3 Kg/m2). The analysed cohort was composed of patients with diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invasive and non-invasive data used in this research were previously analysed using a widely reported methodology and published by our group. The invasive aortic pressure recording was synchronically acquired with an oscillometric brachial acquisition and, then a reconstruction of central pressure wave was performed. In this research a correlation analysis using the entire aortic pressure cycle was performed. Results: Coefficient values found of the whole population, using the entire aortic pressure cycle, were similar to those obtained using the mean value of the cBP cardiac cycle (0.88 versus 0.89; respectively). On the contrary, the slope of the regression line determined by invasive versus noninvasive cBP loops (n = 20) using the entire cBP cycle exhibit a remarkable decrease with respect to that obtained using the mean aortic pressure cycle (0.98 versus 0.77). Conclusions: In a first step, applying an interpolation procedure by means of oversampling and digital low pass filter, we found a high correlation between invasive and noninvasive instantaneous aortic pressure waveforms in: Men, women and the whole population, In a second step, results in terms of correlation coefficient and the slope derived from the regression analysis of invasive and non-invasive using a new data analysis allow to confirm high correlation coefficients and a more realistic slope value of the invasive versus non-invasive pressure wave relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hypertension and management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hypertension and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3690/1510064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hypertension and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3690/1510064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
已有研究表明,无创主动脉血压评估具有预后价值,但由于技术错误和压力波分析的差异,其准确性受到限制。目的:本研究的目的是比较两种用于验证用振荡装置获得的无创中心血压波形和在主动脉水平动脉内测量记录的中心血压波形的方法。方法:本研究共纳入20例受试者,其中男性10例(68±12岁,BMI: 27.4±4.6 Kg/m2),女性10例(77±8岁,BMI: 28.5±5.3 Kg/m2)。所分析的队列由诊断为冠状动脉疾病的患者组成。本研究中使用的侵入性和非侵入性数据先前使用广泛报道的方法进行了分析,并由我们小组发表。有创主动脉压力记录与振荡肱动脉采集同步,然后进行中央压力波重建。在这项研究中,使用整个主动脉压循环进行了相关分析。结果:使用整个主动脉压周期发现的整个人群的系数值与使用cBP心脏周期平均值获得的系数值相似(0.88 vs 0.89;分别)。相反,有创与无创cBP循环(n = 20)测定的整个cBP周期的回复线斜率与平均主动脉压周期测定的斜率相比显著降低(0.98对0.77)。结论:第一步,采用过采样和数字低通滤波器的插值方法,我们发现有创和无创瞬时主动脉压波形具有高度相关性:第二步,利用新的数据分析方法对有创和非创压力波进行回归分析,得到相关系数和斜率的结果,从而确定有创与非创压力波关系的高相关系数和更真实的斜率值。
A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings
Introduction: It has been demonstrated that the noninvasive evaluation of aortic blood pressure has a prognostic value but limited by the inaccuracy linked to technical errors and a differences in the pressure wave analysis. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare two methods used to validate the non-invasively central blood pressure waveforms obtained with an oscillometic device, with those recorded by intra-arterial measurements at the aortic level. Methods: In this study were included 20 subjects, 10 males (68 ± 12-years-old, BMI: 27.4 ± 4.6 Kg/m2) and 10 females (77 ± 8-years-old, BMI: 28.5 ± 5.3 Kg/m2). The analysed cohort was composed of patients with diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invasive and non-invasive data used in this research were previously analysed using a widely reported methodology and published by our group. The invasive aortic pressure recording was synchronically acquired with an oscillometric brachial acquisition and, then a reconstruction of central pressure wave was performed. In this research a correlation analysis using the entire aortic pressure cycle was performed. Results: Coefficient values found of the whole population, using the entire aortic pressure cycle, were similar to those obtained using the mean value of the cBP cardiac cycle (0.88 versus 0.89; respectively). On the contrary, the slope of the regression line determined by invasive versus noninvasive cBP loops (n = 20) using the entire cBP cycle exhibit a remarkable decrease with respect to that obtained using the mean aortic pressure cycle (0.98 versus 0.77). Conclusions: In a first step, applying an interpolation procedure by means of oversampling and digital low pass filter, we found a high correlation between invasive and noninvasive instantaneous aortic pressure waveforms in: Men, women and the whole population, In a second step, results in terms of correlation coefficient and the slope derived from the regression analysis of invasive and non-invasive using a new data analysis allow to confirm high correlation coefficients and a more realistic slope value of the invasive versus non-invasive pressure wave relationship.