从艺术对象到文本:早期概念实践中的语言与感知

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Ars & Humanitas Pub Date : 2019-08-20 DOI:10.4312/ars.13.1.302-317
Nadja Gnamuš
{"title":"从艺术对象到文本:早期概念实践中的语言与感知","authors":"Nadja Gnamuš","doi":"10.4312/ars.13.1.302-317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anglo-Saxon conceptual practices emerging in the 1960s were not only a reaction against modernist discourse, but also the final episode in its search for self-reflection, self-criticism and inquiry into the nature and status of art. The proponents of conceptual art rejected materialist, subjective and expressive theories of the artistic medium and replaced them with idea and thinking as the key principles of art production, thereby making the linguistic, sociological, philosophical, cultural and political context of an artwork important. Ideas rising within this framework offered a form of intellectual self-reflection and at the same time proposed new concepts and possibilities for art production. In art practices of early conceptualism the idea of art was an important topic, in which art practice and art theory were closely intertwined. The relationship between words and images was in this context of paramount importance. Language was a significant trajectory in changing the role and status of art, engendering the shift from an autonomous, aesthetic art object to a textual basis of art, whereby the theory of art itself became considered an artwork. Text was no longer the interpretative support of visual code (image), explaining its meaning, but rather the constitutive element of the artwork. Conceptualism believed that art was first and foremost an intellectual activity, in which it was more important to invent new meanings than new forms. Language thus became an ideal means for turning the focus from formal analysis to the context and discursive formation of artwork.","PeriodicalId":40773,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Art Object to Text: Language and Perception in Early Conceptual Practices\",\"authors\":\"Nadja Gnamuš\",\"doi\":\"10.4312/ars.13.1.302-317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anglo-Saxon conceptual practices emerging in the 1960s were not only a reaction against modernist discourse, but also the final episode in its search for self-reflection, self-criticism and inquiry into the nature and status of art. The proponents of conceptual art rejected materialist, subjective and expressive theories of the artistic medium and replaced them with idea and thinking as the key principles of art production, thereby making the linguistic, sociological, philosophical, cultural and political context of an artwork important. Ideas rising within this framework offered a form of intellectual self-reflection and at the same time proposed new concepts and possibilities for art production. In art practices of early conceptualism the idea of art was an important topic, in which art practice and art theory were closely intertwined. The relationship between words and images was in this context of paramount importance. Language was a significant trajectory in changing the role and status of art, engendering the shift from an autonomous, aesthetic art object to a textual basis of art, whereby the theory of art itself became considered an artwork. Text was no longer the interpretative support of visual code (image), explaining its meaning, but rather the constitutive element of the artwork. Conceptualism believed that art was first and foremost an intellectual activity, in which it was more important to invent new meanings than new forms. Language thus became an ideal means for turning the focus from formal analysis to the context and discursive formation of artwork.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ars & Humanitas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ars & Humanitas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.13.1.302-317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars & Humanitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.13.1.302-317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪60年代出现的盎格鲁-撒克逊概念实践不仅是对现代主义话语的反应,也是其寻求自我反思、自我批评和对艺术本质和地位的探究的最后篇章。观念艺术的支持者拒绝唯物主义、主观主义和表现性的艺术媒介理论,代之以观念和思维作为艺术生产的关键原则,从而使艺术作品的语言、社会学、哲学、文化和政治背景变得重要。在这个框架内产生的思想提供了一种智力自我反思的形式,同时为艺术生产提出了新的概念和可能性。在早期观念主义的艺术实践中,艺术观念是一个重要的话题,艺术实践与艺术理论紧密地交织在一起。在这种情况下,文字和图像之间的关系是至关重要的。语言在改变艺术的角色和地位方面是一个重要的轨迹,它使艺术从一个自主的、审美的艺术对象转变为艺术的文本基础,从而使艺术理论本身被认为是一种艺术。文本不再是视觉代码(图像)的解释性支持,解释其含义,而是艺术作品的构成要素。观念主义认为,艺术首先是一种智力活动,在这种活动中,创造新的意义比创造新的形式更重要。因此,语言成为将焦点从形式分析转向艺术作品的语境和话语形成的理想手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Art Object to Text: Language and Perception in Early Conceptual Practices
Anglo-Saxon conceptual practices emerging in the 1960s were not only a reaction against modernist discourse, but also the final episode in its search for self-reflection, self-criticism and inquiry into the nature and status of art. The proponents of conceptual art rejected materialist, subjective and expressive theories of the artistic medium and replaced them with idea and thinking as the key principles of art production, thereby making the linguistic, sociological, philosophical, cultural and political context of an artwork important. Ideas rising within this framework offered a form of intellectual self-reflection and at the same time proposed new concepts and possibilities for art production. In art practices of early conceptualism the idea of art was an important topic, in which art practice and art theory were closely intertwined. The relationship between words and images was in this context of paramount importance. Language was a significant trajectory in changing the role and status of art, engendering the shift from an autonomous, aesthetic art object to a textual basis of art, whereby the theory of art itself became considered an artwork. Text was no longer the interpretative support of visual code (image), explaining its meaning, but rather the constitutive element of the artwork. Conceptualism believed that art was first and foremost an intellectual activity, in which it was more important to invent new meanings than new forms. Language thus became an ideal means for turning the focus from formal analysis to the context and discursive formation of artwork.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ars & Humanitas
Ars & Humanitas HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contactos e intercambios entre las literaturas de Europa Central y del Sureste y de América Latina durante la Guerra Fría Eslovenia y la Guerra Fría cultural The importance of separating the author from the narrative in modern and classical literature Zagovornik literarne izobrazbe pisateljev in kritikov Alkoholizem v delih slovenskih in čeških pisateljic dolgega 19. stoletja
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1