通过jelajah alam sekitar (jas)方法体验式学习对九年级学生认知学习成果的有效性和对生活土壤及其组成部分学习材料功能的主动性

Alief Alfian, Eny Hartatiyati, Ferina Agustini, Theresia Yustina
{"title":"通过jelajah alam sekitar (jas)方法体验式学习对九年级学生认知学习成果的有效性和对生活土壤及其组成部分学习材料功能的主动性","authors":"Alief Alfian, Eny Hartatiyati, Ferina Agustini, Theresia Yustina","doi":"10.33578/pjr.v7i4.9579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the effectiveness of Experiential Learning on the Jelajah Alam Sekitar approach (JAS) on the ninth-grade students’ cognitive learning outcomes and activeness at SMP Negeri 6 Semarang on the function of soil for life and its component learning material. The research uses the Static Group Comparison method by involving two classes. The control class (9H) uses the lecture method and the experimental class (9G) uses the JAS approach based on Experiential Learning. The cognitive learning outcome data were obtained from multiple choice objective tests (summative assessment), while students’ activeness data were obtained from observation sheets. Data were analyzed by using an independent T-test. The results indicate that the JAS approach was effective in improving students’ cognitive learning outcomes and activeness. It is evidenced by a significant difference between the average score of cognitive learning outcomes in the control class at 89 and in the experimental class at 96.3 with a p-value of 0.043. In addition, there was a difference between the average score of students’ activeness in the control class at 12.3 and in the experimental class at 13 with a p-value of 0.116. Yet, the differences were not significant. Based on the results of the research, it is recommended that teachers can use the JAS approach as one of the alternative learning methods that can improve students’ cognitive learning outcomes and activeness.","PeriodicalId":17723,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH JELAJAH ALAM SEKITAR (JAS) APPROACH ON THE NINTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND ACTIVENESS ON THE FUNCTION OF SOIL FOR LIFE AND ITS COMPONENTS LEARNING MATERIAL\",\"authors\":\"Alief Alfian, Eny Hartatiyati, Ferina Agustini, Theresia Yustina\",\"doi\":\"10.33578/pjr.v7i4.9579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the effectiveness of Experiential Learning on the Jelajah Alam Sekitar approach (JAS) on the ninth-grade students’ cognitive learning outcomes and activeness at SMP Negeri 6 Semarang on the function of soil for life and its component learning material. The research uses the Static Group Comparison method by involving two classes. The control class (9H) uses the lecture method and the experimental class (9G) uses the JAS approach based on Experiential Learning. The cognitive learning outcome data were obtained from multiple choice objective tests (summative assessment), while students’ activeness data were obtained from observation sheets. Data were analyzed by using an independent T-test. The results indicate that the JAS approach was effective in improving students’ cognitive learning outcomes and activeness. It is evidenced by a significant difference between the average score of cognitive learning outcomes in the control class at 89 and in the experimental class at 96.3 with a p-value of 0.043. In addition, there was a difference between the average score of students’ activeness in the control class at 12.3 and in the experimental class at 13 with a p-value of 0.116. Yet, the differences were not significant. Based on the results of the research, it is recommended that teachers can use the JAS approach as one of the alternative learning methods that can improve students’ cognitive learning outcomes and activeness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v7i4.9579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v7i4.9579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了Jelajah-Alam-Sekitar方法(JAS)的体验式学习对九年级学生认知学习结果的有效性,以及SMP Negeri 6 Semarang关于生命土壤及其组成学习材料功能的积极性。本研究采用静态分组比较法,涉及两个类别。控制班(9H)使用讲座方法,实验班(9G)使用基于经验学习的JAS方法。认知学习结果数据来自多项选择目标测试(总结性评估),而学生的积极性数据来自观察表。数据采用独立的T检验进行分析。结果表明,JAS方法在提高学生的认知学习效果和积极性方面是有效的。对照班89分和实验班96.3分的认知学习结果平均分之间存在显著差异,p值为0.043。此外,对照班学生的积极性平均得分为12.3,实验班学生的活跃度平均得分为13,两者之间存在差异,p值为0.116。然而,这些差异并不显著。基于研究结果,建议教师将JAS方法作为一种可提高学生认知学习效果和主动性的替代学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THROUGH JELAJAH ALAM SEKITAR (JAS) APPROACH ON THE NINTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND ACTIVENESS ON THE FUNCTION OF SOIL FOR LIFE AND ITS COMPONENTS LEARNING MATERIAL
This paper discusses the effectiveness of Experiential Learning on the Jelajah Alam Sekitar approach (JAS) on the ninth-grade students’ cognitive learning outcomes and activeness at SMP Negeri 6 Semarang on the function of soil for life and its component learning material. The research uses the Static Group Comparison method by involving two classes. The control class (9H) uses the lecture method and the experimental class (9G) uses the JAS approach based on Experiential Learning. The cognitive learning outcome data were obtained from multiple choice objective tests (summative assessment), while students’ activeness data were obtained from observation sheets. Data were analyzed by using an independent T-test. The results indicate that the JAS approach was effective in improving students’ cognitive learning outcomes and activeness. It is evidenced by a significant difference between the average score of cognitive learning outcomes in the control class at 89 and in the experimental class at 96.3 with a p-value of 0.043. In addition, there was a difference between the average score of students’ activeness in the control class at 12.3 and in the experimental class at 13 with a p-value of 0.116. Yet, the differences were not significant. Based on the results of the research, it is recommended that teachers can use the JAS approach as one of the alternative learning methods that can improve students’ cognitive learning outcomes and activeness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Active, Creative, Effective, and Enjoyable Learning Models on the Fourth-Grade Students’ Learning Outcomes The Effect of Digital Learning Media Based on Wordwall Games on Students’ Learning Outcomes and Learning Motivation at SDN 17 Prabumulih Akidah Akhlak Teacher’s Strategy in Forming Students’ Responsible Attitude Application of the Flipped Classroom Model Using Games-Based Learning Multimedia in Increasing Students’ Learning Outcomes The Effect of Student Team Achievement (STAD) Cooperative Learning Model on the Fourth-Grade Students’ Learning Outcomes at Assisi Medan Elementary School
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1