单自由度系统动力学分析与控制器性能评价

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.21307/ijssis-2020-018
I. I. Gorial
{"title":"单自由度系统动力学分析与控制器性能评价","authors":"I. I. Gorial","doi":"10.21307/ijssis-2020-018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In automation and mechatronics applications, mass spring damper system (MSDS) plays a significant role in ensuring model serviceability and safety. The system’s dynamic of this mechanical system is quite challenging to control. In this paper, the system is a single degree of freedom (SDOF) spring mass system. The issue of performance evaluation of three controllers, linear proportional integral derivate (LPID), nonlinear PID (NPID), and fuzzy logic controller (FLC), is presented. FLC demands that experience be built on information based on a rule. It has two inputs, one of which is the displacement and the other is the velocity, and force is calculated for forced damped vibration control for a single degree of freedom system. The method used for defuzzification is the center of gravity (COG). However, effective control of a system depends largely on the accuracy of the mathematical model that predicts its dynamics behavior. The mathematical model for the MSDS is based on a set of nonlinear second-order ordinary differential equations to simulate the dynamic accurately. The proposed control schemes are implemented with the aid of MATLAB and SIMULINK to investigate the system performance. The sequence of the three controllers in terms of performance is as follows: the first of them is FLC and then in some dominant cases this is NPID by comparison with the LPID and one without any controller cases. Also, FLC displays more effectiveness and efficiency than the system without this controller after a comparative of system analysis performance evaluation.","PeriodicalId":45623,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems","volume":" ","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamical analysis and controllers performance evaluation for single degree-of-freedom system\",\"authors\":\"I. I. Gorial\",\"doi\":\"10.21307/ijssis-2020-018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In automation and mechatronics applications, mass spring damper system (MSDS) plays a significant role in ensuring model serviceability and safety. The system’s dynamic of this mechanical system is quite challenging to control. In this paper, the system is a single degree of freedom (SDOF) spring mass system. The issue of performance evaluation of three controllers, linear proportional integral derivate (LPID), nonlinear PID (NPID), and fuzzy logic controller (FLC), is presented. FLC demands that experience be built on information based on a rule. It has two inputs, one of which is the displacement and the other is the velocity, and force is calculated for forced damped vibration control for a single degree of freedom system. The method used for defuzzification is the center of gravity (COG). However, effective control of a system depends largely on the accuracy of the mathematical model that predicts its dynamics behavior. The mathematical model for the MSDS is based on a set of nonlinear second-order ordinary differential equations to simulate the dynamic accurately. The proposed control schemes are implemented with the aid of MATLAB and SIMULINK to investigate the system performance. The sequence of the three controllers in terms of performance is as follows: the first of them is FLC and then in some dominant cases this is NPID by comparison with the LPID and one without any controller cases. Also, FLC displays more effectiveness and efficiency than the system without this controller after a comparative of system analysis performance evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1 - 12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2020-018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2020-018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在自动化和机电一体化应用中,质量弹簧阻尼系统(MSDS)在保证模型的可使用性和安全性方面起着重要作用。这个机械系统的动态控制是很有挑战性的。在本文中,该系统是一个单自由度弹簧质量系统。提出了线性比例积分微分(LPID)、非线性PID (NPID)和模糊逻辑控制器(FLC)三种控制器的性能评价问题。FLC要求将经验建立在基于规则的信息之上。它有两个输入,一个是位移,另一个是速度,对单自由度系统的强迫阻尼振动控制计算力。消除模糊的方法是重心法(COG)。然而,系统的有效控制在很大程度上取决于预测其动力学行为的数学模型的准确性。为了准确地模拟系统的动力学特性,采用一组非线性二阶常微分方程建立了系统的数学模型。利用MATLAB和SIMULINK对所提出的控制方案进行了实现,并对系统性能进行了研究。三个控制器在性能方面的顺序如下:第一个是FLC,然后在一些主要情况下,与LPID相比,这是NPID,一个没有任何控制器的情况。通过系统分析和性能评价的比较,FLC比没有该控制器的系统显示出更高的有效性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamical analysis and controllers performance evaluation for single degree-of-freedom system
Abstract In automation and mechatronics applications, mass spring damper system (MSDS) plays a significant role in ensuring model serviceability and safety. The system’s dynamic of this mechanical system is quite challenging to control. In this paper, the system is a single degree of freedom (SDOF) spring mass system. The issue of performance evaluation of three controllers, linear proportional integral derivate (LPID), nonlinear PID (NPID), and fuzzy logic controller (FLC), is presented. FLC demands that experience be built on information based on a rule. It has two inputs, one of which is the displacement and the other is the velocity, and force is calculated for forced damped vibration control for a single degree of freedom system. The method used for defuzzification is the center of gravity (COG). However, effective control of a system depends largely on the accuracy of the mathematical model that predicts its dynamics behavior. The mathematical model for the MSDS is based on a set of nonlinear second-order ordinary differential equations to simulate the dynamic accurately. The proposed control schemes are implemented with the aid of MATLAB and SIMULINK to investigate the system performance. The sequence of the three controllers in terms of performance is as follows: the first of them is FLC and then in some dominant cases this is NPID by comparison with the LPID and one without any controller cases. Also, FLC displays more effectiveness and efficiency than the system without this controller after a comparative of system analysis performance evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: nternational Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems (S2IS) is a rapid and high-quality international forum wherein academics, researchers and practitioners may publish their high-quality, original, and state-of-the-art papers describing theoretical aspects, system architectures, analysis and design techniques, and implementation experiences in intelligent sensing technologies. The journal publishes articles reporting substantive results on a wide range of smart sensing approaches applied to variety of domain problems, including but not limited to: Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environment Analysis, Evaluation, and Test of Smart Sensors Intelligent Management of Sensors Fundamentals of Smart Sensing Principles and Mechanisms Materials and its Applications for Smart Sensors Smart Sensing Applications, Hardware, Software, Systems, and Technologies Smart Sensors in Multidisciplinary Domains and Problems Smart Sensors in Science and Engineering Smart Sensors in Social Science and Humanity
期刊最新文献
Performance Comparison of Statistical vs. Neural-Based Translation System on Low-Resource Languages Backpack detection model using multi-scale superpixel and body-part segmentation Study of structural and morphological properties of RF-sputtered SnO2 thin films and their effect on gas-sensing phenomenon Biometric authentication sensor with an encryption module for prevention of h/w hacking in digital custody services Multiple Sensor based Human Detection Robots: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1