传统伊斯兰宗教实践争论:对伊斯兰教比德观念的批判

AlUlum Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.30603/au.v23i1.3498
S. Kau, Zulkarnain Suleman, Irwan
{"title":"传统伊斯兰宗教实践争论:对伊斯兰教比德观念的批判","authors":"S. Kau, Zulkarnain Suleman, Irwan","doi":"10.30603/au.v23i1.3498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses traditional Islamic criticism of the concept of heresy in Salafi Islam, categorizing every new act in religion as iconoclastic heresy. Based on this concept of heresy, ritual ceremonies and practices of traditional Islamic religious traditions are classified as acts of heresy. Through literature research based on literary document sources using abstractive inductive logic methods and content analysis, this study found that ritual ceremonies and practices of traditional Islamic religious traditions are not acts of heresy because they are based on theorem (al-Quran, hadith and allegiance) it is new. New actions (mutants) are categorized as bid'ah if they conflict with the Quran, hadith, and a tsar. Traditional Islam criticizes the concept of heresy in Salafi-Wahhabi Islam for being ahistorical because several traditions show that the innovation of a friend, tâbi'u tâbi'uttab'în, while this innovation was not ordered and practiced by the Prophet; instead, was carried out by the generation of the Salaf.","PeriodicalId":53331,"journal":{"name":"AlUlum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traditional Islamic Religious Practice Arguments: Criticism of The Concept of Bid'ah of Islam Salafi-Wahabi\",\"authors\":\"S. Kau, Zulkarnain Suleman, Irwan\",\"doi\":\"10.30603/au.v23i1.3498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses traditional Islamic criticism of the concept of heresy in Salafi Islam, categorizing every new act in religion as iconoclastic heresy. Based on this concept of heresy, ritual ceremonies and practices of traditional Islamic religious traditions are classified as acts of heresy. Through literature research based on literary document sources using abstractive inductive logic methods and content analysis, this study found that ritual ceremonies and practices of traditional Islamic religious traditions are not acts of heresy because they are based on theorem (al-Quran, hadith and allegiance) it is new. New actions (mutants) are categorized as bid'ah if they conflict with the Quran, hadith, and a tsar. Traditional Islam criticizes the concept of heresy in Salafi-Wahhabi Islam for being ahistorical because several traditions show that the innovation of a friend, tâbi'u tâbi'uttab'în, while this innovation was not ordered and practiced by the Prophet; instead, was carried out by the generation of the Salaf.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AlUlum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AlUlum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30603/au.v23i1.3498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlUlum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30603/au.v23i1.3498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了传统伊斯兰对萨拉菲伊斯兰教异端概念的批评,将宗教中的每一种新行为都归类为破坏圣像的异端。基于这一异端概念,传统伊斯兰宗教传统的仪式和实践被归类为异端行为。通过对文献来源的文献研究,运用抽象归纳逻辑方法和内容分析,本研究发现传统伊斯兰宗教传统的仪式和实践不是异端行为,因为它们基于定理(《古兰经》、圣训和效忠)——这是新的。如果新的行为(变种人)与《古兰经》、圣训和沙皇相冲突,则被归类为bid’ah。传统伊斯兰教批评萨拉菲·瓦哈比伊斯兰教中的异端概念是非历史性的,因为有几个传统表明,一个朋友的创新,tâbi'u tâbi'ttab’în,而这种创新不是先知下令和实践的;相反,是由萨拉夫一代执行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Traditional Islamic Religious Practice Arguments: Criticism of The Concept of Bid'ah of Islam Salafi-Wahabi
This paper discusses traditional Islamic criticism of the concept of heresy in Salafi Islam, categorizing every new act in religion as iconoclastic heresy. Based on this concept of heresy, ritual ceremonies and practices of traditional Islamic religious traditions are classified as acts of heresy. Through literature research based on literary document sources using abstractive inductive logic methods and content analysis, this study found that ritual ceremonies and practices of traditional Islamic religious traditions are not acts of heresy because they are based on theorem (al-Quran, hadith and allegiance) it is new. New actions (mutants) are categorized as bid'ah if they conflict with the Quran, hadith, and a tsar. Traditional Islam criticizes the concept of heresy in Salafi-Wahhabi Islam for being ahistorical because several traditions show that the innovation of a friend, tâbi'u tâbi'uttab'în, while this innovation was not ordered and practiced by the Prophet; instead, was carried out by the generation of the Salaf.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
PENGARUH JENIS BAHAN ORGANIK DAN TIPE PEMUPUKAN TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN DAN PRODUKSI PADI GOGO VARIETAS LIMBOTO KAJIAN PENERIMAAN PANELIS TERHADAP PRODUK COKLAT BATANGAN PENDAWA, SIBIRU-BIRU, DELI SERDANG, SUMATRA UTARA ANALISIS LOGAM BERAT DALAM SEDIMEN PADA HILIR BERDASARKAN GEOACCUMULATION INDEX (IGE) DAERAH ALIRAN SUNGAI DELI ANALISIS TEMPERATUR DAN LAJU ALIR LEAN GLYCOL TERHADAP KADAR UAP AIR PADA DRY GAS DI UNIT DEHIDRASI GAS KAJIAN TEKNOLOGI GASIFIKASI BIOMASSA/SAMPAH UNTUK PRODUKSI SYNGAS DAN LISTRIK BERKELANJUTAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1