一切都是关于权力的?欧洲雇主组织成员资格的多层次分析

IF 1.3 2区 管理学 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2023-04-16 DOI:10.1111/bjir.12744
Alex Lehr, Giedo Jansen, Bernd Brandl
{"title":"一切都是关于权力的?欧洲雇主组织成员资格的多层次分析","authors":"Alex Lehr,&nbsp;Giedo Jansen,&nbsp;Bernd Brandl","doi":"10.1111/bjir.12744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Employers’ organizations (EOs) are the voice of business interests in social partnership and socio-economic policy making. Their legitimacy depends on the willingness of employers to join them as members. We examine the role of two types of power that EOs confer onto their members as drivers of EO membership: countervailing power against labour and organizational power. By analysing large-scale micro-level data on more than 30,000 business establishments across 27 EU countries in 2013 and 2019, we find that at the micro-level, company size, workplace unionization and the presence of trade unions and works councils are positively associated with membership, as is union density at the macro-level. These findings suggest that, in contrast to contemporary arguments in the EO literature, countering the collective power of labour remains an important motivation for EO membership. The positive impact of company size also suggests that organizational power, that is the ability to influence public policies and collective agreements through EOs, dominates the services provided by EOs to their members as a selective incentive for EO membership. Further tests of this argument, however, yield inconclusive results.</p>","PeriodicalId":47846,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"62 2","pages":"233-261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjir.12744","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All about power after all? A multi-level analysis of employers’ organization membership in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Alex Lehr,&nbsp;Giedo Jansen,&nbsp;Bernd Brandl\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjir.12744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Employers’ organizations (EOs) are the voice of business interests in social partnership and socio-economic policy making. Their legitimacy depends on the willingness of employers to join them as members. We examine the role of two types of power that EOs confer onto their members as drivers of EO membership: countervailing power against labour and organizational power. By analysing large-scale micro-level data on more than 30,000 business establishments across 27 EU countries in 2013 and 2019, we find that at the micro-level, company size, workplace unionization and the presence of trade unions and works councils are positively associated with membership, as is union density at the macro-level. These findings suggest that, in contrast to contemporary arguments in the EO literature, countering the collective power of labour remains an important motivation for EO membership. The positive impact of company size also suggests that organizational power, that is the ability to influence public policies and collective agreements through EOs, dominates the services provided by EOs to their members as a selective incentive for EO membership. Further tests of this argument, however, yield inconclusive results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Industrial Relations\",\"volume\":\"62 2\",\"pages\":\"233-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjir.12744\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Industrial Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjir.12744\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjir.12744","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雇主组织是企业利益在社会伙伴关系和社会经济政策制定中的代言人。它们的合法性取决于雇主是否愿意加入成为其成员。我们研究了雇主组织赋予其成员的两类权力对雇主组织成员资格的推动作用:对抗劳工的权力和组织权力。通过分析 2013 年和 2019 年 27 个欧盟国家 3 万多家企业单位的大规模微观数据,我们发现,在微观层面,公司规模、工作场所工会化以及工会和劳资协议会的存在与会员资格正相关,而在宏观层面,工会密度也与会员资格正相关。这些研究结果表明,与当代雇员组织文献中的观点不同,对抗劳工的集体力量仍然是雇员组织成员的一个重要动机。公司规模的积极影响还表明,组织权力,即通过雇主组织影响公共政策和集体协议的能力,在雇主组织为其成员提供的服务中占据主导地位,成为雇主组织成员的选择性激励因素。然而,对这一论点的进一步检验并没有得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
All about power after all? A multi-level analysis of employers’ organization membership in Europe

Employers’ organizations (EOs) are the voice of business interests in social partnership and socio-economic policy making. Their legitimacy depends on the willingness of employers to join them as members. We examine the role of two types of power that EOs confer onto their members as drivers of EO membership: countervailing power against labour and organizational power. By analysing large-scale micro-level data on more than 30,000 business establishments across 27 EU countries in 2013 and 2019, we find that at the micro-level, company size, workplace unionization and the presence of trade unions and works councils are positively associated with membership, as is union density at the macro-level. These findings suggest that, in contrast to contemporary arguments in the EO literature, countering the collective power of labour remains an important motivation for EO membership. The positive impact of company size also suggests that organizational power, that is the ability to influence public policies and collective agreements through EOs, dominates the services provided by EOs to their members as a selective incentive for EO membership. Further tests of this argument, however, yield inconclusive results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Industrial Relations
British Journal of Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: BJIR (British Journal of Industrial Relations) is an influential and authoritative journal which is essential reading for all academics and practitioners interested in work and employment relations. It is the highest ranked European journal in the Industrial Relations & Labour category of the Social Sciences Citation Index. BJIR aims to present the latest research on developments on employment and work from across the globe that appeal to an international readership. Contributions are drawn from all of the main social science disciplines, deal with a broad range of employment topics and express a range of viewpoints.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The price is wrong: Why capitalism won't save the planet by BrettChristophers. 2024, 432 pp., ISBN: 9781804292303, Price £17.60, h/b Social dialogue in the gig economy: A comparative empirical analysis By Bonvin, J., Cianferoni, N. & Mexi, M. ISBN: 9781800372368, £80.00 Recasting workers’ power: Work and inequality in the shadow of the digital ageEdwardWebster and LynfordDor. Bristol University Press, 2023, pp. The politics of the minimum wage: Explaining introduction and levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1