没有过错的罪恶感

IF 3.3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1111/papa.12171
Michael Zhao
{"title":"没有过错的罪恶感","authors":"Michael Zhao","doi":"10.1111/papa.12171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the age of eighteen, Darin Strauss hit and killed a classmate whose bicycle had swerved, across two lanes of traffic, in front of his car. The police determined that he was not at fault for the accident: after all, he had been driving at a safe speed, and likely couldn’t have stopped in time to avoid hitting her. But the accident wracked him with guilt for decades. It wasn’t that Strauss blamed himself for his classmate’s death. Rather, his guilt was directed toward a “plain, plump truth”: “because I’d driven a certain road, someone who had been alive was dead. I had killed someone.”1 Strauss’s case isn’t exceptional. We often feel guilt about outcomes without taking ourselves to have been at fault for them. We can feel guilt about harm that befalls a friend as the result of bad advice we gave her, even if we had every reason beforehand to think that the advice was good; about an illness that we passed to a family member, even if we took the necessary precautions against passing it; or about the sacrifices that our parents made on our behalf when we were young children, even if we did not ask those sacrifices of them. In all of these cases, we feel guilt about the causal role that we had in a harm to others or in their suffering, even if we were in no way at fault for those things.","PeriodicalId":47999,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Public Affairs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/papa.12171","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guilt Without Perceived Wrongdoing\",\"authors\":\"Michael Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/papa.12171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the age of eighteen, Darin Strauss hit and killed a classmate whose bicycle had swerved, across two lanes of traffic, in front of his car. The police determined that he was not at fault for the accident: after all, he had been driving at a safe speed, and likely couldn’t have stopped in time to avoid hitting her. But the accident wracked him with guilt for decades. It wasn’t that Strauss blamed himself for his classmate’s death. Rather, his guilt was directed toward a “plain, plump truth”: “because I’d driven a certain road, someone who had been alive was dead. I had killed someone.”1 Strauss’s case isn’t exceptional. We often feel guilt about outcomes without taking ourselves to have been at fault for them. We can feel guilt about harm that befalls a friend as the result of bad advice we gave her, even if we had every reason beforehand to think that the advice was good; about an illness that we passed to a family member, even if we took the necessary precautions against passing it; or about the sacrifices that our parents made on our behalf when we were young children, even if we did not ask those sacrifices of them. In all of these cases, we feel guilt about the causal role that we had in a harm to others or in their suffering, even if we were in no way at fault for those things.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy & Public Affairs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/papa.12171\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy & Public Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12171\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12171","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

18岁时,达林·施特劳斯(Darin Strauss)撞死了一位同学,因为他的自行车在他汽车前面的两条车道上突然转弯。警方认定他在事故中没有过错:毕竟,他一直在以安全的速度开车,很可能没有及时停车以避免撞到她。但这场事故让他愧疚了几十年。施特劳斯并不是为他同学的死而自责。相反,他的罪恶感指向一个“简单而丰满的事实”:“因为我开了一条路,一个活着的人死了。”我杀了人。施特劳斯的情况并不例外。我们经常对结果感到内疚,却不认为自己有错。即使我们事先有充分的理由认为这个建议是好的,我们也会因为给朋友提了不好的建议而对她造成伤害而感到内疚;我们把疾病传染给了家人,即使我们采取了必要的预防措施;或者当我们还是孩子的时候,我们的父母为我们所做的牺牲,即使我们没有要求他们做出这些牺牲。在所有这些情况下,我们对自己在伤害他人或造成他人痛苦中的因果作用感到内疚,即使我们对这些事情没有任何过错。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guilt Without Perceived Wrongdoing
At the age of eighteen, Darin Strauss hit and killed a classmate whose bicycle had swerved, across two lanes of traffic, in front of his car. The police determined that he was not at fault for the accident: after all, he had been driving at a safe speed, and likely couldn’t have stopped in time to avoid hitting her. But the accident wracked him with guilt for decades. It wasn’t that Strauss blamed himself for his classmate’s death. Rather, his guilt was directed toward a “plain, plump truth”: “because I’d driven a certain road, someone who had been alive was dead. I had killed someone.”1 Strauss’s case isn’t exceptional. We often feel guilt about outcomes without taking ourselves to have been at fault for them. We can feel guilt about harm that befalls a friend as the result of bad advice we gave her, even if we had every reason beforehand to think that the advice was good; about an illness that we passed to a family member, even if we took the necessary precautions against passing it; or about the sacrifices that our parents made on our behalf when we were young children, even if we did not ask those sacrifices of them. In all of these cases, we feel guilt about the causal role that we had in a harm to others or in their suffering, even if we were in no way at fault for those things.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Kolodny Against Hierarchy Universal Statism Individuality as Difference Moral Understanding Between You and Me The Role of Civility in Political Disobedience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1