校长和教师对学校绩效反馈报告的理解。从用户有效性的角度探索误解

IF 0.3 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogische Studien Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.59302/ps.v100i1.13991
E. Goffin, R. Janssen, J. Vanhoof, Financiering onderzoek, Pedagogische Studiën
{"title":"校长和教师对学校绩效反馈报告的理解。从用户有效性的角度探索误解","authors":"E. Goffin, R. Janssen, J. Vanhoof, Financiering onderzoek, Pedagogische Studiën","doi":"10.59302/ps.v100i1.13991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School performance feedback can be a tool for school improvement. However, when educational professionals do not comprehend the data they are provided with, they will not arrive at valid inferences and correct diagnoses. We interviewed 23 Flemish primary school teachers and principals, asking them to explain authentic feedback from a national assessment. Framework analysis of think-aloud data reveals that participants’ comprehension of typical concepts is clouded by a range of misconceptions. We observed that that visual, verbal and mathematical building blocks in the report can become stumbling blocks. Moreover, misconceptions can be attributed to a certain extent to disconnects between feedback providers’ and feedback users’ frames of reference. These findings have important implications for data providers, considering they have a responsibility to cater to the interpretability of the data they provide.","PeriodicalId":54044,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogische Studien","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principals’ and Teachers’ Comprehension of School Performance Feedback Reports. Exploring Misconceptions from a User Validity Perspective\",\"authors\":\"E. Goffin, R. Janssen, J. Vanhoof, Financiering onderzoek, Pedagogische Studiën\",\"doi\":\"10.59302/ps.v100i1.13991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"School performance feedback can be a tool for school improvement. However, when educational professionals do not comprehend the data they are provided with, they will not arrive at valid inferences and correct diagnoses. We interviewed 23 Flemish primary school teachers and principals, asking them to explain authentic feedback from a national assessment. Framework analysis of think-aloud data reveals that participants’ comprehension of typical concepts is clouded by a range of misconceptions. We observed that that visual, verbal and mathematical building blocks in the report can become stumbling blocks. Moreover, misconceptions can be attributed to a certain extent to disconnects between feedback providers’ and feedback users’ frames of reference. These findings have important implications for data providers, considering they have a responsibility to cater to the interpretability of the data they provide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogische Studien\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogische Studien\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59302/ps.v100i1.13991\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogische Studien","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59302/ps.v100i1.13991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学校表现反馈可以成为学校改进的工具。然而,当教育专业人员不理解所提供的数据时,他们将无法得出有效的推论和正确的诊断。我们采访了23名佛兰德小学教师和校长,请他们解释国家评估的真实反馈。对大声思考数据的框架分析表明,参与者对典型概念的理解受到一系列误解的影响。我们观察到,报告中的视觉、语言和数学构建块可能会成为绊脚石。此外,误解在一定程度上可以归因于反馈提供者和反馈用户的参考框架之间的脱节。考虑到数据提供者有责任满足其提供的数据的可解释性,这些发现对数据提供者具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Principals’ and Teachers’ Comprehension of School Performance Feedback Reports. Exploring Misconceptions from a User Validity Perspective
School performance feedback can be a tool for school improvement. However, when educational professionals do not comprehend the data they are provided with, they will not arrive at valid inferences and correct diagnoses. We interviewed 23 Flemish primary school teachers and principals, asking them to explain authentic feedback from a national assessment. Framework analysis of think-aloud data reveals that participants’ comprehension of typical concepts is clouded by a range of misconceptions. We observed that that visual, verbal and mathematical building blocks in the report can become stumbling blocks. Moreover, misconceptions can be attributed to a certain extent to disconnects between feedback providers’ and feedback users’ frames of reference. These findings have important implications for data providers, considering they have a responsibility to cater to the interpretability of the data they provide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogische Studien
Pedagogische Studien EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Hoe stilte tot ons spreekt De effecten van een meertalige interventie op zowel de sociaal-affectieve als cognitieve ontwikkeling van basisschoolleerlingen Burgerschap in het basisonderwijs. Kenmerken van scholen en competenties van leerlingen De invloed van gespreid leiderschap op de professionalisering van leraren Toetsing en motivatie. Synergie en balans in formatief handelen en summatief toetsen beïnvloeden vanuit een systemisch perspectief
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1