“PLS-SEM:确实是一颗银弹”-回顾观察和最近的进展

M. Sarstedt, Joseph F. Hair, C. Ringle
{"title":"“PLS-SEM:确实是一颗银弹”-回顾观察和最近的进展","authors":"M. Sarstedt, Joseph F. Hair, C. Ringle","doi":"10.1080/10696679.2022.2056488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2011, the Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice published “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet,” which became a cornerstone contribution in marketing. Critical reflection of research work is a fundamental building block of science, including one’s own writing. In this spirit, we offer a review of our own 2011 paper, assuming we were reviewers with today’s background knowledge of the method. Taking a reviewer’s perspective in our comments, we clarify several ambiguities in our initial overview presentation and offer updates of – from today’s perspective– outdated descriptions that led to some criticisms in recent years which have since been overcome.","PeriodicalId":16424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"261 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"88","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet” – retrospective observations and recent advances\",\"authors\":\"M. Sarstedt, Joseph F. Hair, C. Ringle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10696679.2022.2056488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In 2011, the Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice published “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet,” which became a cornerstone contribution in marketing. Critical reflection of research work is a fundamental building block of science, including one’s own writing. In this spirit, we offer a review of our own 2011 paper, assuming we were reviewers with today’s background knowledge of the method. Taking a reviewer’s perspective in our comments, we clarify several ambiguities in our initial overview presentation and offer updates of – from today’s perspective– outdated descriptions that led to some criticisms in recent years which have since been overcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"261 - 275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"88\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2022.2056488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2022.2056488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

摘要

2011年,《市场营销理论与实践》杂志发表了《PLS-SEM:确实是一颗银弹》一文,成为市场营销领域的奠基石。对研究工作的批判性反思是科学的基本组成部分,包括自己的写作。本着这种精神,我们提供了我们自己2011年论文的回顾,假设我们是具有今天的方法背景知识的评论者。在我们的评论中,我们从审稿人的角度出发,澄清了我们最初概述中的一些模糊之处,并从今天的角度更新了近年来导致一些批评的过时描述,这些描述已经被克服了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet” – retrospective observations and recent advances
ABSTRACT In 2011, the Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice published “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet,” which became a cornerstone contribution in marketing. Critical reflection of research work is a fundamental building block of science, including one’s own writing. In this spirit, we offer a review of our own 2011 paper, assuming we were reviewers with today’s background knowledge of the method. Taking a reviewer’s perspective in our comments, we clarify several ambiguities in our initial overview presentation and offer updates of – from today’s perspective– outdated descriptions that led to some criticisms in recent years which have since been overcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice is devoted to the publication of peer-reviewed articles addressing substantive, managerial issues in marketing. In the context of developing, enhancing, and disseminating marketing knowledge, JMTP publishes both conceptual and empirical work, so long as the work provides strong implications for the managerial practice of marketing. Unlike other marketing journals that may be more focused on specific methodological approaches, deal with theoretical issues without regard to application, or represent various subfields of marketing, JMTP is positioned as a general marketing journal affording a quality outlet for more managerially-oriented research across the scope of the field.
期刊最新文献
To block or not to block? Predictors of ad blocker usage Customer relationship management in healthcare: strategies for adoption in a public health system Creative consumers and experiential benefits and outcomes of upcycling end-of-life products Examining the impact of absorptive capacity and organizational learning on international strategic performance: can the two go together? Proxy reports of others’ behaviors: when are they more accurate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1