拥抱情感转向:回应研究人员的情绪

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Emotions and Society Pub Date : 2020-07-14 DOI:10.1332/263169020x15925529968217
V. Knight, Irene Zempi
{"title":"拥抱情感转向:回应研究人员的情绪","authors":"V. Knight, Irene Zempi","doi":"10.1332/263169020x15925529968217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the role of researchers’ emotions when researching sensitive topics. Drawing on two different ethnographic research projects, experiences of imprisonment and hate crime victimisation, respectively, we reflect on the important role that our emotions occupied\n within the research context. Within the framework of sociology of emotions, we discuss our subjective experiences of qualitative research with prisoners and victims of hate crime. We actively celebrate the work by Bondi (2005) and offer\n an extended discussion on the value of using emotions as important methodological tools that should be used as part of the methodological and analytical process. We employ the concept of the ‘emotional turn’ to emphasise the importance of researcher emotions in ethnographic work,\n and the value of those emotions in guiding methodological and ethical decision making. Specifically, we use envy, guilt and shame – three key emotions that we both experienced and utilised throughout our independently conducted research projects – to illustrate how\n and why emotions are important for guiding decision making in research. The particular emotions centred here (envy, guilt, and shame) are not tied to hard-to-reach groups or sensitive topics; rather, emotionally engaged research is important as all researchers need to understand how their\n emotions could/should shape their methodological choices. The article concludes by assessing the value and challenges of embracing the emotional turn, and offers some methodological guidance for future researchers. Within this we raise important questions about the universality of emotions\n experienced during research. We tentatively conclude that research work does trigger shared emotive responses.","PeriodicalId":29742,"journal":{"name":"Emotions and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embracing the emotional turn: responding to researchers’ emotions\",\"authors\":\"V. Knight, Irene Zempi\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/263169020x15925529968217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the role of researchers’ emotions when researching sensitive topics. Drawing on two different ethnographic research projects, experiences of imprisonment and hate crime victimisation, respectively, we reflect on the important role that our emotions occupied\\n within the research context. Within the framework of sociology of emotions, we discuss our subjective experiences of qualitative research with prisoners and victims of hate crime. We actively celebrate the work by Bondi (2005) and offer\\n an extended discussion on the value of using emotions as important methodological tools that should be used as part of the methodological and analytical process. We employ the concept of the ‘emotional turn’ to emphasise the importance of researcher emotions in ethnographic work,\\n and the value of those emotions in guiding methodological and ethical decision making. Specifically, we use envy, guilt and shame – three key emotions that we both experienced and utilised throughout our independently conducted research projects – to illustrate how\\n and why emotions are important for guiding decision making in research. The particular emotions centred here (envy, guilt, and shame) are not tied to hard-to-reach groups or sensitive topics; rather, emotionally engaged research is important as all researchers need to understand how their\\n emotions could/should shape their methodological choices. The article concludes by assessing the value and challenges of embracing the emotional turn, and offers some methodological guidance for future researchers. Within this we raise important questions about the universality of emotions\\n experienced during research. We tentatively conclude that research work does trigger shared emotive responses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emotions and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emotions and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/263169020x15925529968217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotions and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/263169020x15925529968217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了研究者在研究敏感话题时情绪的作用。借鉴两个不同的人种学研究项目,分别监禁和仇恨犯罪受害的经验,我们反思了我们的情绪在研究背景下所扮演的重要角色。在情感社会学的框架内,我们讨论了我们对囚犯和仇恨犯罪受害者的定性研究的主观经验。我们积极地庆祝Bondi(2005)的工作,并就使用情感作为重要的方法论工具的价值进行了扩展讨论,这些工具应该作为方法论和分析过程的一部分。我们采用“情感转向”的概念来强调研究者情感在民族志工作中的重要性,以及这些情感在指导方法论和伦理决策方面的价值。具体来说,我们用嫉妒、内疚和羞耻——我们在独立进行的研究项目中都经历过并利用过的三种关键情绪——来说明情绪如何以及为什么对指导研究决策很重要。这里集中的特定情感(嫉妒、内疚和羞耻)与难以触及的群体或敏感话题无关;相反,情感参与的研究很重要,因为所有研究人员都需要了解他们的情绪如何能够/应该影响他们的方法选择。文章最后评估了拥抱情感转向的价值和挑战,并为未来的研究者提供了一些方法指导。在这一点上,我们提出了关于研究过程中所经历的情感普遍性的重要问题。我们初步得出结论,研究工作确实会引发共同的情绪反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Embracing the emotional turn: responding to researchers’ emotions
This article examines the role of researchers’ emotions when researching sensitive topics. Drawing on two different ethnographic research projects, experiences of imprisonment and hate crime victimisation, respectively, we reflect on the important role that our emotions occupied within the research context. Within the framework of sociology of emotions, we discuss our subjective experiences of qualitative research with prisoners and victims of hate crime. We actively celebrate the work by Bondi (2005) and offer an extended discussion on the value of using emotions as important methodological tools that should be used as part of the methodological and analytical process. We employ the concept of the ‘emotional turn’ to emphasise the importance of researcher emotions in ethnographic work, and the value of those emotions in guiding methodological and ethical decision making. Specifically, we use envy, guilt and shame – three key emotions that we both experienced and utilised throughout our independently conducted research projects – to illustrate how and why emotions are important for guiding decision making in research. The particular emotions centred here (envy, guilt, and shame) are not tied to hard-to-reach groups or sensitive topics; rather, emotionally engaged research is important as all researchers need to understand how their emotions could/should shape their methodological choices. The article concludes by assessing the value and challenges of embracing the emotional turn, and offers some methodological guidance for future researchers. Within this we raise important questions about the universality of emotions experienced during research. We tentatively conclude that research work does trigger shared emotive responses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Courtroom Ethnography: Exploring Contemporary Approaches, Fieldwork and Challenges by Lisa Flower and Sarah Klosterkamp (eds) (2023) The politics of joy under semi-authoritarianism: the trajectory of joyous struggles in a protest cycle in Hong Kong Emotionalising hope in times of climate change Crisis and the Culture of Fear and Anxiety in Contemporary Europe by Carmen Zamorano Llena, Jonas Stier and Billy Gray (eds) (2024) ‘Where are you from?’ The affective and emotional dimensions of an ambiguous event of everyday racism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1