{"title":"巴古尤班的基本要素","authors":"Ahmad Solahuddin Dunkring","doi":"10.24042/klm.v12i1.2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an independent mysticism community which has an independent system belief and form of praying, etc., Paguyuban Ngesti Tunggal ( Pangestu ) does not force the members to come out of the religion they embraced. Pangestu explicitly declares as a community of mysticism that offering an oasis of spirituality, which is not given by a great religion, such as Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, etc. Thus, the Pangestu members have a dualistic belief at the same time: believing in their religion and believing in Pangestu . This paradox would be interesting to be a problem of research. In this case, I would like to examine Pangestu with the point of Durkheim theory that is the 'basic element' in rural religion. The point of view of the writer would be: system belief, practice relative and sacred thing. In the end, the conclusions of this study are: 1. The system belief of Pangestu including to: the concept of divinity in the form of Tripurusa ; The ritual of worship is nyawiji (emanation) process between man and God; Rules of procedure, including to the orders in the form of Hastasila and prohibited in the form of Paliwara . 2. The practice relatife of Pangestu including to Bawa Raos that it to convey the core of Pangestu teaching and ceremonies held at every August 16th to commemorate the death of the holy man Pak Dhe Narto. 3. The Sacred thing of Pangestu which including to the grave, the house of Pak Dhe Narto which made as museum, the inscription, the flag, akik (the agate stone) that being spread over around the grave, etc. which it would be functioned as a reminder to the teaching of Guru Sejati .","PeriodicalId":31601,"journal":{"name":"Kalam","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE BASIC ELEMENTS OF PAGUYUBAN NGESTI TUNGGAL\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Solahuddin Dunkring\",\"doi\":\"10.24042/klm.v12i1.2020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As an independent mysticism community which has an independent system belief and form of praying, etc., Paguyuban Ngesti Tunggal ( Pangestu ) does not force the members to come out of the religion they embraced. Pangestu explicitly declares as a community of mysticism that offering an oasis of spirituality, which is not given by a great religion, such as Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, etc. Thus, the Pangestu members have a dualistic belief at the same time: believing in their religion and believing in Pangestu . This paradox would be interesting to be a problem of research. In this case, I would like to examine Pangestu with the point of Durkheim theory that is the 'basic element' in rural religion. The point of view of the writer would be: system belief, practice relative and sacred thing. In the end, the conclusions of this study are: 1. The system belief of Pangestu including to: the concept of divinity in the form of Tripurusa ; The ritual of worship is nyawiji (emanation) process between man and God; Rules of procedure, including to the orders in the form of Hastasila and prohibited in the form of Paliwara . 2. The practice relatife of Pangestu including to Bawa Raos that it to convey the core of Pangestu teaching and ceremonies held at every August 16th to commemorate the death of the holy man Pak Dhe Narto. 3. The Sacred thing of Pangestu which including to the grave, the house of Pak Dhe Narto which made as museum, the inscription, the flag, akik (the agate stone) that being spread over around the grave, etc. which it would be functioned as a reminder to the teaching of Guru Sejati .\",\"PeriodicalId\":31601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kalam\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kalam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v12i1.2020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kalam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v12i1.2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
作为一个独立的神秘主义团体,拥有独立的系统信仰和祈祷形式等,帕古尤班·恩盖斯蒂·通加尔(Pangestu)并不强迫成员走出他们所信奉的宗教。Pangestu明确宣称,作为一个神秘主义社区,它提供了一片精神绿洲,而这是伊斯兰教、基督教、天主教等伟大宗教所没有的。因此,Pangestu成员同时具有二元信仰:相信自己的宗教和相信Pangestu。如果把这个悖论作为一个研究问题,那将是一件有趣的事。在这种情况下,我想用涂尔干理论的观点来审视Pangestu,这是乡村宗教中的“基本元素”。笔者的观点是:制度信仰、实践相对、神圣之物。最后,本研究的结论是:1。Pangestu的制度信仰包括:以Tripurusa形式存在的神性概念;崇拜仪式是人与神之间的散发过程;议事规则,包括以Hastasila形式下达的命令和以Paliwara形式禁止的命令。2.Pangestu的实践关系,包括它传达Pangestu教学的核心,以及每年8月16日举行的纪念圣人Pak Dhe Narto去世的仪式。3.Pangestu的圣物,包括坟墓、作为博物馆的Pak Dhe Narto的房子、铭文、旗帜、散布在坟墓周围的akik(玛瑙石)等,它将起到提醒Sejati上师教学的作用。
As an independent mysticism community which has an independent system belief and form of praying, etc., Paguyuban Ngesti Tunggal ( Pangestu ) does not force the members to come out of the religion they embraced. Pangestu explicitly declares as a community of mysticism that offering an oasis of spirituality, which is not given by a great religion, such as Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, etc. Thus, the Pangestu members have a dualistic belief at the same time: believing in their religion and believing in Pangestu . This paradox would be interesting to be a problem of research. In this case, I would like to examine Pangestu with the point of Durkheim theory that is the 'basic element' in rural religion. The point of view of the writer would be: system belief, practice relative and sacred thing. In the end, the conclusions of this study are: 1. The system belief of Pangestu including to: the concept of divinity in the form of Tripurusa ; The ritual of worship is nyawiji (emanation) process between man and God; Rules of procedure, including to the orders in the form of Hastasila and prohibited in the form of Paliwara . 2. The practice relatife of Pangestu including to Bawa Raos that it to convey the core of Pangestu teaching and ceremonies held at every August 16th to commemorate the death of the holy man Pak Dhe Narto. 3. The Sacred thing of Pangestu which including to the grave, the house of Pak Dhe Narto which made as museum, the inscription, the flag, akik (the agate stone) that being spread over around the grave, etc. which it would be functioned as a reminder to the teaching of Guru Sejati .