考虑使用等加权指数作为南非股票投资者的基准

IF 0.1 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE South African Actuarial Journal Pub Date : 2019-12-17 DOI:10.4314/saaj.v19i1.3
BH Taljaard, E. Maré
{"title":"考虑使用等加权指数作为南非股票投资者的基准","authors":"BH Taljaard, E. Maré","doi":"10.4314/saaj.v19i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyse and discuss the use of an equal-weighted index as an alternative to the market capitalisation weighted (cap-weighted) index as a benchmark for active equity portfolios in the South African equity market. Our findings indicate that equal-weighted portfolios are, in general, more efficient than capweighted portfolios and that random active portfolios tend to display significantly improved risk-return characteristics when using an equal-weighted index as a benchmark. We find our results are robust to transaction costs involved with rebalancing.Keywords: Benchmark; risk; capitalisation weight; equal weight; efficiency; rebalancing; costs; returns","PeriodicalId":40732,"journal":{"name":"South African Actuarial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considering the use of an equal-weighted index as a benchmark for South African equity investors\",\"authors\":\"BH Taljaard, E. Maré\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/saaj.v19i1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyse and discuss the use of an equal-weighted index as an alternative to the market capitalisation weighted (cap-weighted) index as a benchmark for active equity portfolios in the South African equity market. Our findings indicate that equal-weighted portfolios are, in general, more efficient than capweighted portfolios and that random active portfolios tend to display significantly improved risk-return characteristics when using an equal-weighted index as a benchmark. We find our results are robust to transaction costs involved with rebalancing.Keywords: Benchmark; risk; capitalisation weight; equal weight; efficiency; rebalancing; costs; returns\",\"PeriodicalId\":40732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Actuarial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Actuarial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/saaj.v19i1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Actuarial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/saaj.v19i1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们分析和讨论使用等加权指数作为市值加权(市值加权)指数的替代方案,作为南非股票市场积极股票投资组合的基准。我们的研究结果表明,等权投资组合总体上比资本加权投资组合更有效,而随机主动投资组合在使用等权指数作为基准时往往表现出显著改善的风险收益特征。我们发现我们的结果对涉及再平衡的交易成本是稳健的。关键词:基准;风险;市值重量;相等的重量;效率;再平衡;成本;返回
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Considering the use of an equal-weighted index as a benchmark for South African equity investors
We analyse and discuss the use of an equal-weighted index as an alternative to the market capitalisation weighted (cap-weighted) index as a benchmark for active equity portfolios in the South African equity market. Our findings indicate that equal-weighted portfolios are, in general, more efficient than capweighted portfolios and that random active portfolios tend to display significantly improved risk-return characteristics when using an equal-weighted index as a benchmark. We find our results are robust to transaction costs involved with rebalancing.Keywords: Benchmark; risk; capitalisation weight; equal weight; efficiency; rebalancing; costs; returns
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Actuarial Journal
South African Actuarial Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anti-selection in voluntary health insurance markets: A focus on medical schemes in South Africa Quantitative guidelines for retiring (more safely) in South Africa Suitability of the 2.5% net discount rate for quantum of damage calculations in South Africa An economic scenario generator for embedded derivatives in South Africa The impact of giving and receiving remittances on life insurance purchases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1